Cited by 59Land Use and Ecosystem ServicesUrban Green Space and HealthUrban Planning and Landscape Design

How are nature based solutions contributing to priority societal challenges surrounding human well-being in the United Kingdom: a systematic map protocol

Open access
Dick, Jan, Miller, James D., Carruthers-Jones, Jonathan, Dobel, Anne J., Carver, Steve, Garbutt, Angus, Hester, Alison, Hails, Rosie +2 more·2019·Environmental Evidence

Abstract

Background: The concept of Nature-based Solutions (NBS) has evolved as an umbrella concept embracing concepts such as Green/Blue/Nature Infrastructure, Ecosystem Approach, Ecosystem Services, but at their core, they cluster into the general theme of learning from and using nature to create sustainable socio-ecological systems, which enhance human well-being (HWB). NBS address societal challenges across a broad range of spatial scales—local, regional and global—and temporal scales—medium to long-term. While there are many reviews and a clear evidence base linking certain NBS to various elements of HWB, particularly urban greenspace and human health, no comprehensive mapping exists of the links between NBS interventions and the associated multiple positive and negative HWB outcomes across a range of habitats. The initial research phase used a participatory co-design process to select four priority societal challenges facing the United Kingdom: three related to management issues i.e. NBS cost-efficacy, governance in planning, environmental justice, and the fourth threats to the acoustic environment. These challenges collectively address priority management issues which stakeholders requested be investigated widely i.e. across landscapes, cityscapes, seascapes and soundscapes. Results of the study are intended to identify and define potential future environmental evidence challenges for UK science. Methods: This protocol describes the methodology for approaching the research question: What evidence is there for nature based solutions and their impacts on human wellbeing for societal challenges related to cost-efficacy, governance in planning, environmental justice, and the acoustic environment? Using systematic mapping, this study will search for and identify studies that seek to assess nature-based solutions on human well-being with regard to these four societal challenges. Systematic searches across a number of academic/online databases are tested against a number of test articles. Search results are refined using eligibility criteria through a three stage process: title, abstract, full text. Data from screened studies are extracted using a predefined coding strategy. Key trends in data will be synthesized according to a range of secondary questions and be presented in a graphical matrix illustrating the knowledge gaps and clusters for research into nature-based solutions and human well-being for each societal challenge.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13750-019-0180-4

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Positive benefits of NbS on human well-being from engaging with gardening and urban agriculture and employing NbS to lower health risks and vulnerabilities are supported.

    “This is further supported by positive benefits of NbS on human well-being (47, 63) from engaging with gardening and urban agriculture in general (22, 63) and employing NbS to lower health risks and vulnerabilities (30).”

    From Global synthesis and regional insights for mainstreaming urban nature-based solutions (2025) · cites this paper as [47]

    The Abstract (page unavailable) says there is a clear evidence base linking some nature-based solutions to human well-being, particularly urban greenspace and health. The Search string includes “urban agriculture” and “community garden,” but the paper does not report benefits specifically from gardening or urban agriculture. The separate claim about lowering health risks is cited to reference 30, not this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There is strong evidence on the positive public health outcomes from engaging with nature and biodiversity and from living near urban green spaces in cities.

    “There is strong evidence on the positive public health outcomes from engaging with nature and biodiversity and from living near urban green spaces in cities (44, 47, 56–62).”

    From Global synthesis and regional insights for mainstreaming urban nature-based solutions (2025) · cites this paper as [47]

    The Abstract describes a clear evidence base linking certain nature-based solutions—particularly urban greenspace—to human health. The Background says reconnecting with nature can improve physical and mental health. Neither passage specifically establishes health outcomes from engaging with biodiversity or from living near, rather than using, urban greenspace; no page numbers are provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The most prominent societal challenge facing NbS is how to center justice and make inclusive planning for NbS a standard practice given limited participatory urban planning and governance.

    “The most prominent societal challenge facing NbS is how to center justice and make inclusive planning for NbS a standard practice given limited participatory urban planning and governance (23, 24, 26, 32, 44–53).”

    From Global synthesis and regional insights for mainstreaming urban nature-based solutions (2025) · cites this paper as [47]

    In 'Systematic mapping question prioritization' (page unavailable), the paper identifies environmental justice and governance in planning as priority challenges, including reducing inequalities and encouraging wide stakeholder engagement. It does not rank justice and inclusive planning as the single most prominent challenge, call for inclusive planning to become standard practice, or establish that limited participatory urban planning and governance is the reason for these priorities. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. MEA. Millennium ecosystem assessment. Ecosystems and human wellbe- ing: synthesis. Washington DC: Island Press; 2005. p. 137.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dick, J., Miller, J. D., Carruthers-Jones, J., Dobel, A. J., Carver, S., Garbutt, A., Hester, A., Hails, R., Magreehan, V., & Quinn, M.
Affiliations
  • UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (GB)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • James Hutton Institute (GB)
  • National Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Miller, James D.
Venue
Environmental Evidence
Published
2019-11-22
Volume
8
Issue
1
ISSN
2047-2382 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2990229801
Cited by
52
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2
FWCI
3.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Evidence (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Natural Environment Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Urban Green Space and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Urban Planning and Landscape Design
Keywords
nature-based solutions, human well-being, societal challenges, planning governance, environmental justice, acoustic environment, urban green space, ecosystem services, knowledge gaps, United Kingdom

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review