Cited by 22Innovations in Medical EducationHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutHealth and Medical Education

Training for staff who support students

Flynn, Eleanor, Woodward‐Kron, Robyn, Hu, Wendy·2016·The Clinical Teacher

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Front-line administrative, academic and clinical teaching staff often find themselves providing pastoral and learning support to students, but they are often not trained for this role, and this aspect of their work is under-acknowledged. CONTEXT: Staff participating in an action research study at two medical schools identified common concerns about the personal impact of providing student support, and of the need for professional development to carry out this responsibility. This need is magnified in clinical placement settings that are remote from on-campus services. INNOVATION: Informed by participatory action research, brief interactive workshops with multimedia training resources were developed, conducted and evaluated at eight health professional student training sites. These workshops were designed to: (1) be delivered in busy clinical placement and university settings; (2) provide a safe and inclusive environment for administrative, academic and clinical teaching staff to share experiences and learn from each other; (3) be publicly accessible; and (4) promote continued development and roll-out of staff training, adapted to each workplace (see http://www.uws.edu.au/meusupport). The workshops were positively evaluated by 97 participants, with both teaching and administrative staff welcoming the opportunity to discuss and share experiences. Staff supporting health professional students have shared, often unmet, needs for support themselves IMPLICATIONS: Staff supporting health professional students have shared, often unmet, needs for support themselves. Participatory action research can be a means for producing and maintaining effective training resources as well as the conditions for change in practice. In our workshops, staff particularly valued opportunities for guided discussion using videos of authentic cases to trigger reflection, and to collaboratively formulate student support guidelines, customised to each site.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/tct.12392

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flynn, E., Woodward‐Kron, R., & Hu, W.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
Corresponding author
Hu, Wendy
Venue
The Clinical Teacher
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-06-26
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
63-68
ISSN
  • 1743-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-498X
OpenAlex
W1949404987
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Clinical Teacher (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Australian and New Zealand Association of Health Professional Educators
  • Australian Collaborative Education Network (ACEN)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
Keywords
student support, employee training, pastoral care, health professions education, clinical practicum, professional development, employee well-being, participatory action research, reflective practice, medical schools
MeSH terms
Faculty, Medical, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Male, Social Support, Staff Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review