Cited by 4Wildlife-Road Interactions and ConservationLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesGeographic Information Systems Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Optimal routefinding across landscapes featuring high-cost linear obstacles

Dean, Denis J., Thakar, Vaishnavi, Sirdeshmukh, Neeraj·2016·Transactions in GIS

Abstract

Existing GIS‐based least‐cost routefinding approaches can in some cases be confounded by linear features in the landscape whose crossing costs are high relative to other traversing costs found throughout the landscape. Unfortunately, such high‐cost linear features are not uncommon; they frequently occur in the form of hydrologic features whose crossing costs are high relative to costs of traversing the surrounding dry land. This study (1) enumerates the situations where existing approaches can fail, (2) proposes a simple method for overcoming the limitations of the existing approaches, and (3) conducts an experiment to assess the impact of the weaknesses of existing approaches and the magnitude of the differences between the results produced by existing and revised approaches. Our results show that in mountainous terrain, linear hydrologic features with high crossing costs can have a profound impact on least‐cost routes, and the choice of solution method has equally profound impacts on the optimal route produced by the analysis.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/tgis.12170

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. DelavarM R2003Pipeline routing using geospatial information system analysis. InProceedings of the Ninth Scandinavian Research Conference on Geographical Information Science Espoo Finland: 203‐13

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dean, D. J., Thakar, V., & Sirdeshmukh, N.
Affiliations
  • Geography and Geospatial Information Science University of Texas at Dallas
  • The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
Venue
Transactions in GIS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-09-11
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
613-625
ISSN
  • 1361-1682 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9671
OpenAlex
W1874609180
Cited by
4
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Transactions in GIS (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geographic Information Systems Studies
Keywords
least-cost path, route optimization, mountainous terrain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review