Cited by 69Blood donation and transfusion practicesNonprofit Sector and VolunteeringOrgan Donation and Transplantation

Easy come, easy go. Retention of blood donors

van Dongen, A.·2015·Transfusion Medicine

Abstract

Retention of blood donors has benefits over recruitment of new blood donors. Retention is defined as preventing donors from lapsing and eventually becoming inactive. This review paper discusses literature on the importance of efforts to retain donors, specifically new donors, since lapsing is most common before the fifth donation. Studies have found that intention to donate, attitudes towards blood donation and self-efficacy (does one feel capable of donating blood) are predictors of blood donation. Feelings of 'warm glow' predict donation behaviour better than altruism. The existing literature further suggests that first time donors can be retained by paying extra attention to adverse events (vasovagal reactions and fatigue). These events could be reduced by drinking water and muscle tension exercises. Feelings of anxiety (in regular donors) and stress can further prevent donors from returning. Planning donations amongst busy lives can help retention, and suggestions are given on which interventions might be helpful.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/tme.12249

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many studies have reported higher prevalence of vasovagal reactions among female donors in various donation setups.

    “Many studies have reported higher prevalence of vasovagal reactions among the female donors in various donation setup (4,9,16,17,22,23, 24, 25, 26).”

    From ADVERSE EVENTS IN BLOOD DONORS: SPECTRUM AND REMEDY (2023) · cites this paper as [4]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Dongen, A.
Affiliations
Department of Donor Studies Sanquin Research Amsterdam the Netherlands
Venue
Transfusion Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-08
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
227-233
ISSN
  • 0958-7578 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3148
OpenAlex
W2164232706
Cited by
69
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Transfusion Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Blood donation and transfusion practices
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Organ Donation and Transplantation
Keywords
blood donor retention, blood donor recruitment, intention to donate, self-efficacy, warm glow, altruism, vasovagal reaction, fatigue, donor anxiety, water intake
MeSH terms
Altruism, Anxiety, Attitude to Health, Blood Donors, Habits, Humans, Tissue and Organ Procurement, Persuasive Communication, Stress, Psychological, Volunteers, Syncope, Vasovagal, Tissue and Organ Harvesting, Blood Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review