Cited by 2,525Behavioral Health and InterventionsBehavioral and Psychological StudiesHealth Policy Implementation Science

A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions

Open access
Abraham, Charles, Michie, Susan·2008·Health Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Without standardized definitions of the techniques included in behavior change interventions, it is difficult to faithfully replicate effective interventions and challenging to identify techniques contributing to effectiveness across interventions. This research aimed to develop and test a theory-linked taxonomy of generally applicable behavior change techniques (BCTs). DESIGN: Twenty-six BCTs were defined. Two psychologists used a 5-page coding manual to independently judge the presence or absence of each technique in published intervention descriptions and in intervention manuals. RESULTS: Three systematic reviews yielded 195 published descriptions. Across 78 reliability tests (i.e., 26 techniques applied to 3 reviews), the average kappa per technique was 0.79, with 93% of judgments being agreements. Interventions were found to vary widely in the range and type of techniques used, even when targeting the same behavior among similar participants. The average agreement for intervention manuals was 85%, and a comparison of BCTs identified in 13 manuals and 13 published articles describing the same interventions generated a technique correspondence rate of 74%, with most mismatches (73%) arising from identification of a technique in the manual but not in the article. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate the feasibility of developing standardized definitions of BCTs included in behavioral interventions and highlight problematic variability in the reporting of intervention content.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0278-6133.27.3.379

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Literature suggests using BCTT with behaviour change theories and frameworks, such as goal setting theory, TTM, TRA, and COM-B framework, for more effective and sustainable behaviour change.

    “Literature suggests using BCTT with behaviour change theories and frameworks, such as goal setting theory, TTM, TRA, and Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) framework, for more effective and sustainable behaviour change [64–67].”

    From School-based healthy eating interventions for adolescents aged 10–19 years: an umbrella review (2024) · cites this paper as [64]

    In “Developing a theory-linked taxonomy of behavior change techniques” (page not provided), the paper links BCTs to TRA and goal theories and discusses the transtheoretical model. It does not mention COM-B, and its discussion of effectiveness is conditional rather than evidence that combining these frameworks with BCTs produces more effective and sustainable change. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • BCTT can improve intervention designs, enable cross-study analysis, and inform implementation feasibility.

    “BCTT can improve intervention designs, enable cross-study analysis, and inform implementation feasibility [64, 68, 69].”

    From School-based healthy eating interventions for adolescents aged 10–19 years: an umbrella review (2024) · cites this paper as [64]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says a shared BCT vocabulary would let researchers understand and compare intervention designs across studies. The paper also says standardized descriptions could help designers and support faithful replication and adoption, but it does not say the taxonomy informs whether implementation is feasible. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Although the prototype design process listed desired outcome behaviors of the intervention, the approach lacked clearly stated behavior change techniques for each of the desired behaviors.

    “Although the prototype design process listed desired outcome behaviors of the intervention, the approach lacked clearly stated behavior change techniques for each of the desired behaviors [78].”

    From Development and feasibility of a digital acceptance and commitment therapy⇓based intervention for generalized anxiety disorder: Pilot acceptability study (2021) · cites this paper as [78]

    The Discussion says that specifying intervention content is critical, and the section on theory-based techniques praises descriptions that clearly list discrete behavior change techniques. The paper does not establish that techniques must be stated separately for each desired outcome behavior; the assessment of the citing authors’ prototype is their own. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Since the millennium, increasing emphasis has been placed on preventative medicine, patient empowerment, and behaviour change to encourage people to moderate behaviours linked to chronic illness and disease.

    “Since the millennium, increasing emphasis has been placed on preventative medicine, patient empowerment, and behaviour change to encourage people to moderate behaviours linked to chronic illness and disease”

    From Mindfulness and Resilience in Britain: A Genealogy of the “Present Moment” (2021) · cites this paper as Abraham and Michie 2008

    The section on developing the taxonomy describes health-behavior interventions aimed at preventing weight gain and promoting physical activity and healthy eating. That supports the sentence’s general point about changing health-related behavior, but our copy does not establish increasing emphasis since the millennium or an emphasis on patient empowerment. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • While psychosocial theories such as SCT, SLT, and TPB were most commonly used to inform the interventions, these interventions did not incorporate behaviour change taxonomy technique (BCTT).

    “While psychosocial theories, such as SCT, SLT, and TPB were most commonly used to inform the interventions, these interventions did not incorporate behaviour change taxonomy technique (BCTT) [64, 65].”

    From School-based healthy eating interventions for adolescents aged 10–19 years: an umbrella review (2024) · cites this paper as [64]

    The ‘Developing a theory-linked taxonomy’ section links BCTs to TPB and social cognitive theory, but does not say those theories, or SLT, were most commonly used to inform the interventions in question. The Discussion says links between techniques and theories are not always clear in published descriptions; it does not establish that these interventions failed to incorporate a BCT taxonomy. Searches for the claimed theory-use pattern and taxonomy omission found no passage addressing either point. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [17]17. Durantini, M. R., Albarracín, D., Earl, A., & Mitchell, A. L. (2006). Conceptualizing the influence of social agents of change: A meta-analysis of HIV prevention interventions across different genders, ethnicities, ages, and behaviorally-defined groups. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 212- 248.
  2. [34]34. Michie, S., Johnston, M., Francis, J., Hardeman, W. & Eccles, M. (under review). From theory to intervention: mapping theoretical constructs to behaviour change techniques.
  3. [54]54. Prompt review of behavioral goals (CT) Review and/or reconsideration of previously set goals or intentions.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abraham, C., & Michie, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Sussex (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Venue
Health Psychology
Published
2008
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
379-387
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
OpenAlex
W2057181385
Cited by
2,525
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 85 · 2024: 107 · 2023: 121 · 2022: 124 · 2021: 163 · 2020: 230 · 2019: 181 · 2018: 187 · 2017: 176 · 2016: 187 · 2015: 197 · 2014: 166 · 2013: 167 · 2012: 141
FWCI
105.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
behaviour change techniques, taxonomy (general classification scheme), behavioral interventions, intervention reporting, coding reliability, intervention manual, intervention replication
MeSH terms
Behavior Therapy, Humans, Psychotherapy, Health Behavior, Bibliometrics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review