Cited by 10Blood donation and transfusion practicesCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersBlood transfusion and management

Prevention strategies for vasovagal reaction in whole blood donors: A Quadri-armed randomised control trial

Open access
Meher, Radheshyam, Patidar, Gopal Kumar, Chaurasia, Rahul, Pandey, Hem Chandra, Hazarika, Anjali·2024·Transfusion Medicine

Abstract

Introduction: Vasovagal reaction (VVR) is a frequently encountered generalised donor adverse reaction, associated with donor deterrence towards future donation. Several mitigation strategies for prevention of VVR were tried but still not standardised. This quadri‐armed randomised study evaluated the utility of water ingestion, applied muscle tension (AMT) and combination of both in preventing the VVR among blood donors. Methods: A quadri‐armed randomised controlled trial was performed on 4320 whole blood donors. Blood donors of 18–65 years of age were randomised into four groups based on the interventions performed i.e., control with no intervention (Group 1, n = 1081), water ingestion (Group 2, n = 1082), AMT (Group 3, n = 1070) and combined intervention (Group 4, n = 1087). VVR during and immediately after blood donation were observed along with assessment of risk factors in blood donors and the effectiveness of interventions were analysed. Results: The incidence of VVR observed 1.6% in our study, with the highest occurrence in the control group (2.5%) and the lowest in the combined intervention group (0.9%). Multivariable logistic regression revealed that the control group donors faced a 1.38‐fold greater risk of VVR compared to those receiving interventions (OR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.10–1.75). Other risk factors included younger age (OR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.05–2.17), first‐time donation (OR: 5.7, 95% CI: 1.66–5.74), prior history of VVR (OR: 2.5, 95% CI: 10.4–101.52). Discussion/Conclusion: The combined approach of water ingestion and AMT proved significantly more effective in VVR prevention compared to individual interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/tme.13026

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [24]24. Rai S, Sharma D, Arya A, Jain B, Yadav U. Adverse reaction in whole blood donors at a tertiary care Centre, Gwalior. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2018;17:31-37.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meher, R., Patidar, G. K., Chaurasia, R., Pandey, H. C., & Hazarika, A.
Affiliations
All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Corresponding author
Patidar, Gopal Kumar
Venue
Transfusion Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-01-02
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
20-29
ISSN
  • 0958-7578 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3148
OpenAlex
W4390508138
Cited by
10
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
FWCI
4.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Transfusion Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Blood donation and transfusion practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Blood transfusion and management
Keywords
vasovagal reaction, whole blood donors, prevention, water intake, combined intervention, risk factors
MeSH terms
Strobilurins, Blood Donors, Humans, Pyrimidines, Risk Factors, Water, Syncope, Vasovagal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review