The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optical maps refine the bread wheat Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring genome assembly
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Until recently, achieving a reference‐quality genome sequence for bread wheat was long thought beyond the limits of genome sequencing and assembly technology, primarily due to the large genome size and > 80% repetitive sequence content. The release of the chromosome scale 14.5‐Gb IWGSC RefSeq v1.0 genome sequence of bread wheat cv. Chinese Spring (CS) was, therefore, a milestone. Here, we used a direct label and stain (DLS) optical map of the CS genome together with a prior nick, label, repair and stain (NLRS) optical map, and sequence contigs assembled with Pacific Biosciences long reads, to refine the v1.0 assembly. Inconsistencies between the sequence and maps were reconciled and gaps were closed. Gap filling and anchoring of 279 unplaced scaffolds increased the total length of pseudomolecules by 168 Mb (excluding Ns). Positions and orientations were corrected for 233 and 354 scaffolds, respectively, representing 10% of the genome sequence. The accuracy of the remaining 90% of the assembly was validated. As a result of the increased contiguity, the numbers of transposable elements (TEs) and intact TEs have increased in IWGSC RefSeq v2.1 compared with v1.0. In total, 98% of the gene models identified in v1.0 were mapped onto this new assembly through development of a dedicated approach implemented in the MAGAAT pipeline. The numbers of high‐confidence genes on pseudomolecules have increased from 105 319 to 105 534. The reconciled assembly enhances the utility of the sequence for genetic mapping, comparative genomics, gene annotation and isolation, and more general studies on the biology of wheat.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669
The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools
Li, H., Handsaker, B., Wysoker, A., Fennell, T., Ruan, J., Homer, N., Marth, G., Abecasis, G., Durbin, R., & 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 · Cited by 62,041
Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform
Li, H., & Durbin, R. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 · Cited by 58,607
Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads
Martin, M. (2011) · EMBnet.journal · doi:10.14806/ej.17.1.200 · Cited by 33,889
BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features
Quinlan, A. R., & Hall, I. M. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033 · Cited by 27,437
Minimap2: Pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences
Li, H. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191 · Cited by 14,807
Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.
Li, H., & Durbin, R. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698 · Cited by 12,063
EMBOSS: the European molecular biology open software suite.
Rice, P., Longden, I., & Bleasby, A. (2000) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/s0168-9525(00)02024-2 · Cited by 9,466
Walker, B. J., Abeel, T., Shea, T., Priest, M., Abouelliel, A., Sakthikumar, S., Cuomo, C. A., Zeng, Q., Wortman, J., Young, S. K., et al. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0112963 · Cited by 9,197
Cited by
GENESPACE tracks regions of interest and gene copy number variation across multiple genomes
Lovell, J. T., Sreedasyam, A., Schranz, M. E., Wilson, M., Carlson, J. W., Harkess, A., Emms, D., Goodstein, D. M., & Schmutz, J. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.78526 · Cited by 391
Li, Y., Wei, Z.-Z., Sela, H., Govta, L., Klymiuk, V., Roychowdhury, R., Chawla, H. S., Ens, J., Wiebe, K., Bocharova, V., et al. (2024) · Plant Communications · doi:10.1016/j.xplc.2023.100646 · Cited by 103
(2024) · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-49257-2 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhu, T., Wang, L., Rimbert, H., Rodriguez, J. C., Deal, K. R., De Oliveira, R., Choulet, F., Keeble‐Gagnère, G., Tibbits, J., Rogers, J., Eversole, K., Appels, R., Gu, Y. Q., Mascher, M., Dvorak, J., & Luo, M.
- Venue
- The Plant Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-05-16
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 303-314
- ISSN
- 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-313X
- OpenAlex
- W3152539674
- Cited by
- 565
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 46.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optical maps refine the bread wheat Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring genome assembly. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/tpj.15289
- The paper
- Zhu, T., Wang, L., Rimbert, H., Rodriguez, J. C., Deal, K. R., De Oliveira, R., Choulet, F., Keeble‐Gagnère, G., Tibbits, J., Rogers, J., Eversole, K., Appels, R., Gu, Y. Q., Mascher, M., Dvorak, J., & Luo, M. (2021). Optical maps refine the bread wheat Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring genome assembly. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.15289
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.