Cited by 31Spinal Cord Injury ResearchMedical Practices and RehabilitationStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

Systematic Review of Psychosocial Interventions for People With Spinal Cord Injury During Inpatient Rehabilitation: Implications for Evidence‐Based Practice

Li, Yan, Bressington, Daniel, Chien, Wai Tong·2017·Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing

Abstract

Background: The bio‐psychosocial model of spinal cord injury (SCI) highlights that psychosocial care is of equal importance as physical rehabilitation, and should be offered in the earlier stages of inpatient rehabilitation. Aim: This systematic review aimed to identify interventional research regarding psychosocial care for people with SCI during inpatient rehabilitation and synthesize the evidence of the effects and characteristics of these studies. Methods: A systematic search of relevant literature published between 1985 to July 2016 was conducted with six databases (Scopus, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Science Citation Index Expanded, PsycINFO, and the China Academic Journal Full‐text Database). Reference lists of the identified articles were reviewed to find additional relevant articles. Results: A total of four randomized controlled trials and seven non‐randomized controlled trials were included in this review. The interventions focused on specialized types of SCI population with relatively high levels of psychological distress, pain or pressure ulcers. Studies reported some varied or inconsistent improvements in participants’ cognitive appraisal, psychosocial adaptation or mental health but there were no significant effects on their coping ability. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies, findings were synthesized narratively without conducting meta‐analysis. Linking Evidence to Action: This review found promising evidence that approaches to psychosocial care for people with SCI can improve their cognitive appraisal and psychosocial adaptation. Significant methodological limitations weakened study findings. Additionally, because studies were conducted in only a few developed countries with subgroups of patients having specific illness characteristics or severity, their generalizability to the wider SCI population is uncertain. Therefore, future research should adopt more robust study designs to test psychosocial interventions for SCI patients with different socio‐cultural backgrounds and psychological adjustment conditions in the early stages of rehabilitation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/wvn.12238

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Further systematic review evidence has evaluated psychosocial interventions for inpatients with spinal cord injury, concluding that more work is required to evidence such interventions for this group.

    “Further systematic review evidence has evaluated psychosocial interventions for inpatients with SCI, concluding that more work is required to evidence such interventions for this group [8].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Y., Bressington, D., & Chien, W. T.
Affiliations
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Corresponding author
Li, Yan
Venue
Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-07-29
Volume
14
Issue
6
Pages
499-506
ISSN
  • 1545-102X (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-6787
OpenAlex
W2740884618
Cited by
31
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Keywords
spinal cord injury, psychosocial interventions, inpatient rehabilitation, biopsychosocial model, psychological distress, coping, psychosocial adjustment, mental health, pressure ulcers, pain, cognitive appraisal, evidence-based practice
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Humans, Psychology, Spinal Cord Injuries, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Evidence-Based Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review