Cited by 92Pancreatic function and diabetesConnexins and lens biologyNeural dynamics and brain function

THE TOPOGRAPHY OF ELECTRICAL SYNCHRONY AMONG β‐CELLS IN THE MOUSE ISLET OF LANGERHANS

Open access
Meda, Paolo, Orci, Lelio, Atwater, Illani, Bangham, Andrew, Rojas, Eduardo, Gonçalves, Ari·1984·Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology

Abstract

β‐Cells in microdissected islets of Langerhans produce rhythmical bursts of electrical activity. This was monitored with two micro‐electrodes simultaneously and the frequency and phase (collectively referred to as synchrony) of the two signals was investigated. At any instant two impaled cells produced bursts of the same frequency even when separated by up to 400 µm. When the electrode tips were separated by less than about 20 µm and current injection showed the cells to be ionically coupled the two signals were in phase and had almost identical shape. The phase relations between cells further apart were variable, the leading cell usually being located deeper within the islet than the other impaled cell. Increasing the glucose concentration increased electrical activity, reduced any phase lags and made the shape of the bursts more similar. There was less lag between the responses from two cells when the glucose concentration was suddenly reduced, than when it was suddenly increased. Qualitatively similar observations were made in glibenclamide‐treated mice, a treatment previously shown to increase dye coupling between islet cells. However, the response to increasing glucose concentrations showed less phase lag; likewise the phase lag between bursts was reduced. Furthermore the response to current injected into one cell could be detected at much larger distances (up to 80 µm) than in control islets. This suggests that electrical coupling of β‐cells was improved in sulphonylurea‐treated mice. Electron microscopy of both control and glibenclamide‐treated mouse islets fixed at the end of each electrophysiological experiment showed the region impaled by the electrodes to be well preserved and, whenever the electrodes penetrated at least 20 µm into the islet, to contain a large proportion of β‐cells. The data support the view that, within an islet, most but not necessarily all cells are electrically synchronized, and that the coupling can be modulated by natural and pharmacological secretagogues.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/expphysiol.1984.sp002864

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • β-cells are electrically coupled, and electrical activity and changes in [Ca2+]i spread across the islet synchronously with a wave initiated in one part and propagating to other parts with a slight delay.

    “As β-cells are electrically coupled electrical activity and changes in [Ca2+]i spread across the islet in a synchronous fashion with the ‘wave’ being initiated in one part of the islet and then propagating to other parts with a slight delay(165, 440, 591).”

    From Pancreatic β-Cell Electrical Activity and Insulin Secretion: Of Mice and Men (2018) · cites this paper as [440]

    The Abstract and Quantitative evaluation (page numbers unavailable) report synchronized electrical bursts in cells across a mouse islet, with variable phase lags and a tendency for delay to increase with cell separation. The paper does not report changes in intracellular Ca2+ or establish a wave that initiates at one site and propagates across the islet. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. ATWATER, I. & BEIGELMAN, P. M. (1976). Dynamic characteristics of electrical activity in pancreatic ,f-cells. I. Effects of calcium and magnesium removal. Journal de physiologie 72, 769-786.
  2. ATWATER, I., DAWSON, C. M., SCOTT, A., EDDLESTONE, G. & ROJAS, E. (1980). The Nature of the Oscillatory Behaviour in Electrical Activity from Pancreatic f-cell. Journal of Hormone and Metabolic Research, suppl. 10, Biochemistry and Biophysics of the pancreatic B-cell, ed. MALAISSE, W. J. & TALJEDAL, I.-B., pp. 101-107.
  3. ATWATER, I., FRANKEL, B. J., ROJAS, E. & GRODSKY, G. M. (1983). fl-cell membrane potential and insulin release; role of calcium and calcium: magnesium ratio. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology 68, 233-245. membrane induced by glucose in Islets of Langerhans from mouse. Journal of Physiology 278, 117-139.
  4. BEIGELMAN, P. M., RIBALET, B. & ATWATER, I. J. (1 977). Electrical activity of mouse pancreatic ,-cells. II. Effects of glucose and arginine. Journal de physiologie 73, 201-217.
  5. BENNET, M. V. L. & GOODENOUGH, D. A. (1 978). Gapjunctions, electrotonic coupling and intercellular communication. Neurosciences Research Program Bulletin 16, 377-486.
  6. DEAN, P. M. & MATTHEWS, E. K. (1970). Glucose-induced electrical activity in pancreatic islet cells. Journal of Physiology 210, 255-264.
  7. EDDLESTONE, G. T., GONCALVES, A., BANGHAM, J. A. & RoJAs, E. (1983). Electrical coupling between cells of the mouse islet of Langerhans. Journal of Membrane Biology 77, 1-14.
  8. EDDLESTONE, G. T. & ROJAS, E. (1980). Evidence of electrical coupling between mouse pancreatic fl-cells. Journal of Physiology 303, 76-77P.
  9. EISENBERG, R. S., BARCILON, V. & MATHIS, R. T. (1979). Electrical properties of spherical syncitia. Biophysical Journal 25, 151-180.
  10. FERRER, R., ATWATER, I., OMER, E. M., GON4ALVES, A. A., CROGHAN, P. C. & ROJAS, E. E. (1984). Electrophysiological evidence for the inhibition of potassium permeability in pancreatic fl-cells by glibenclamide. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology 69, 831-839.
  11. FURSHPAN, E. J. & POTTER, D. D. (1959). Transmission at the giant motor synapses of crayfish. Journal of Physiology 145, 289-325.
  12. MATTHEWS, E. K. & DEAN, P. M. (1970). The biophysical effects of insulin-releasing agents in islet cells. Postgraduate Medical Journal, December suppl., 21-23.
  13. MATTHEWS, E. K., DEAN, P. M. & SAKAMOTO, Y. (1972). Biophysical Effects of Sulphonylureas on Islet Cells. Pharmacology and the future of Man. Proceedings of the 5th International Congress on Pharmacology 3, 221-229.
  14. MEDA, P., DENEF, J.-F., PERRELET, A. & ORCI, L. (1980 a). Non-random distribution of gap junctions between pancreatic fl-cells. American Journal of Physiology 238, Cl 14-119.
  15. MEDA, P., KOHEN, E., KOHEN, C., RABINOVITCH, A. & ORCI, L. (1982a). Direct Communication of homologous and heterologous endocrine islet cells in culture. Journal of Cell Biology 92, 221-226.
  16. MEDA, P., MICHAELS, R. L., HALBAN, P. A., ORCI, L. & SHERIDAN, J. D. (1983). In vivo modulation of gap junctions and dye coupling between fl-cells of the intact pancreatic islet. Diabetes (in the Press).
  17. MEDA, P., PERRELET, A. & ORCI, L. (1979). Increase of gap junctions between pancreatic ,-cells during stimulation of insulin secretion. The Journal of Cell Biology 82, 441-448.
  18. MEDA, P., PERRELET, A. & ORCI, L. (1980 c). Gap junctions and fl-cell functions. Journal of Hormone and Metabolic Research, suppl. 10, Biochemistry and Biophysics of the pancreatic B-cell, ed.
  19. MALAISSE, W. J. & TALJEDAL, I.-B., pp. 157-162.
  20. PITTS, J. D. & FINBOW, M. E., pp. 11 3-13 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  21. MEISSNER, H. P. (1976a). Electrical characteristics of the f-cells in pancreatic islets. Journal de physiologie 72, 757-767.
  22. MEISSNER, H. P. & ATWATER, I. (1976). The kinetics of electrical activity of fl-cells in response to a 'square wave' stimulation with glucose or glibenclamide. Journal of Hormone and Metabolic Research 8, 11-15.
  23. ORCI, L., MALAISSE-LAGAE, F., RAVAZZOLA, M., ROUILLER, D., RENOLD, A. E., PERRELET, A. & UNGER, R. (1975). A morphological basis for intercellular communication between f and ,-cells in the endocrine pancreas. The Journal of Clinical Investigation 56, 1066-1070.
  24. PESKOFF, A. (1979). Electrical potential in three-dimensional electrically syncitial tissues. Bulletin of Mathematics and Physics 41, 163-181.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meda, P., Orci, L., Atwater, I., Bangham, A., Rojas, E., & Gonçalves, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
  • Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
Venue
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1984-10-10
Volume
69
Issue
4
Pages
716-735
ISSN
0144-8757 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985515689
Cited by
92
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Connexins and lens biology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
pancreatic beta cells, pancreatic islets, electrical coupling, glibenclamide, sulfonylureas, current injection, phase lag, mice
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Cell Communication, Electrophysiology, Glyburide, Glucose, Islets of Langerhans, Membrane Potentials, Mice, Inbred Strains, Microelectrodes, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review