Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 161

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Firing patterns of gastrocnemius motor units in the decerebrate cat

Open access
Burke, R. E.·1968·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. The patterns of medial gastrocnemius (MG) motor unit firing in response to MG muscle stretch have been studied in decerebrate cats, using intracellular recording techniques. In most of the units, the motoneurone axonal conduction velocity and cell input resistance were measured, and the maximum amplitude and wave form of the group Ia composite EPSP evoked by MG nerve stimulation were determined. The mechanical properties of the muscle unit portion of each motor unit were also studied. 2. Motor unit firing patterns were classified into two groups, ‘tonic’ and ‘phasic’. With few exceptions, tonic motor units showed sustained firing throughout MG stretches of varying duration, while most phasic units did not fire at all to the same stimulus. Tetanization of the afferents did not convert any of the previously phasic units to tonic firing. 3. MG motor units in this study were divided into three groups on the basis of the muscle unit twitch properties. Units with short twitch time to peak values (< 35 msec) were subdivided into two groups according to twitch tension output: (a) type F, with twitch tension > 1·5 g, and (b) type F*, with twitch tension < 1·5 g. Units with slow twitch time to peak (> 35 msec) were classified as type S. 4. The presence or absence of tonic firing during sustained MG stretch was found to be significantly related to the following factors: (a) the motor unit twitch type, in that tonic firing was observed in 100% of type S, 70% of type F*, and only 10% of type F units; (b) the apparent motoneurone size, in that tonic units tended to have higher cell input resistance values and slower axonal conduction velocities than phasic units; and (c) the density and spatial organization of the group Ia synaptic input, in that the MG monosynaptic EPSPs found in tonic motor units tended to be both larger in amplitude and longer in duration than those found in phasic units. 5. The intrinsic properties of MG motor units, the characteristics of the group Ia synaptic input to the motoneurones and the unit firing patterns elicited by MG muscle stretch appear to be mutually interrelated, forming a pattern of motor units within the MG pool which is analogous to the pattern thought to characterize the motor units belonging to ‘slow’ and ‘fast’ muscles. In most respects this pattern of MG motor units appears to be a continuum without clearly separable subgroups.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008527

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 161

Metadata

Authors
Burke, R. E.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1968-06
Volume
196
Issue
3
Pages
631-654
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2071048029
Cited by
161
References
1
FWCI
12.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Firing patterns of gastrocnemius motor units in the decerebrate cat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008527
The paper
Burke, R. E. (1968). Firing patterns of gastrocnemius motor units in the decerebrate cat. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008527

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.