Cited by 326Muscle activation and electromyography studiesMuscle Physiology and DisordersMotor Control and Adaptation

Relationship between firing rate and recruitment threshold of motoneurons in voluntary isometric contractions

Open access
De Luca, Carlo J., Hostage, Emily C.·2010·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

We used surface EMG signal decomposition technology to study the control properties of numerous simultaneously active motor units. Six healthy human subjects of comparable age (21 +/- 0.63 yr) and physical fitness were recruited to perform isometric contractions of the vastus lateralis (VL), first dorsal interosseous (FDI), and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles at the 20, 50, 80, and 100% maximum voluntary contraction force levels. EMG signals were collected with a five-pin surface array sensor that provided four channels of data. They were decomposed into the constituent action potentials with a new decomposition algorithm. The firings of a total of 1,273 motor unit action potential trains, 20-30 per contraction, were obtained. The recruitment thresholds and mean firing rates of the motor units were calculated, and mathematical equations were derived. The results describe a hierarchical inverse relationship between the recruitment thresholds and the firing rates, including the first and second derivatives, i.e., the velocity and the acceleration of the firing rates. This relationship describes an "operating point" for the motoneuron pool that remains consistent at all force levels and is modulated by the excitation. This relationship differs only slightly between subjects and more distinctly across muscles. These results support the "onion skin" property that suggests a basic control scheme encoded in the physical properties of motoneurons that responds consistently to a "common drive" to the motoneuron pool.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.01018.2009

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Luca, C. J., & Hostage, E. C.
Affiliations
  • NeuroMuscular Research Center,
  • Boston University (US)
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2010-08
Volume
104
Issue
2
Pages
1034-1046
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2113200940
Cited by
326
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 10
FWCI
7.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS058250, R01NS058250)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-050111, R01HD050111)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
motor unit recruitment threshold, motor unit firing rate, motoneuron pools, isometric voluntary contraction, surface electromyography, EMG signal decomposition, common drive, vastus lateralis, first dorsal interosseous muscle, tibialis anterior, motor unit action potentials
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Electromyography, Female, Humans, Isometric Contraction, Male, Motor Neurons, Recruitment, Neurophysiological, Regression Analysis, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Strength, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review