The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The analysis of image motion by the rabbit retina
Open accessAbstract
1. Micro‐electrode recordings were made from rabbit retinal ganglion cells or their axons. Of particular interest were direction‐selective units; the common on—off type represented 20·6% of the total sample (762 units), and the on‐type comprised 5% of the total. 2. From the large sample of direction‐selective units, it was found that on—off units were maximally sensitive to only four directions of movement; these directions, in the visual field, were, roughly, anterior, superior, posterior and inferior. The on‐type units were maximally sensitive to only three directions: anterior, superior and inferior. 3. The direction‐selective unit's responses vary with stimulus velocity; both unit types are more sensitive to velocity change than to absolute speed. On—off units respond to movement at speeds from 6′/sec to 10°/sec; the on‐type units responded as slowly as 30″/sec up to about 2°/sec. On‐type units are clearly slow‐movement detectors. 4. The distribution of direction‐selective units depends on the retinal locality. On—off units are more common outside the ‘visual streak’ (area centralis) than within it, while the reverse is true for the on‐type units. 5. A stimulus configuration was found which would elicit responses from on‐type units when the stimulus was moved in the null direction. This ‘paradoxical response’ was shown to be associated with the silent receptive field surround. 6. The four preferred directions of the on—off units were shown to correspond to the directions of retinal image motion produced by contractions of the four rectus eye muscles. This fact, combined with data on velocity sensitivity and retinal distribution of on—off units, suggests that the on—off units are involved in control of reflex eye movements. 7. The on—off direction‐selective units may provide error signals to a visual servo system which minimizes retinal image motion. This hypothesis agrees with the known characteristics of the rabbit's visual following reflexes, specifically, the slow phase of optokinetic nystagmus.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Receptive fields and trigger features of ganglion cells in the visual streak of the rabbit's retina
Levick, W. R. (1967) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008140 · Cited by 384
Cited by
Rapid innate defensive responses of mice to looming visual stimuli
Yilmaz, M., & Meister, M. (2013) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.08.015 · Cited by 611
Parallel visual pathways: A review
Lennie, P. (1980) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(80)90115-7 · Cited by 509
The diverse functional roles and regulation of neuronal gap junctions in the retina
Bloomfield, S. A., & Völgyi, B. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2636 · Cited by 428
Cleland, B. G., & Levick, W. R. (1974) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010618 · Cited by 422
Huberman, A. D., Wei, W., Elstrott, J., Stafford, B. K., Feller, M. B., & Barres, B. A. (2009) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.04.014 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Oyster, C. W.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1968-12
- Volume
- 199
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 613-635
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2069964608
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.