Cited by 611Visual perception and processing mechanismsMemory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Rapid innate defensive responses of mice to looming visual stimuli

Open access
Yilmaz, Melis, Meister, Markus·2013·Current Biology

Abstract

Much of brain science is concerned with understanding the neural circuits that underlie specific behaviors. While the mouse has become a favorite experimental subject, the behaviors of this species are still poorly explored. For example, the mouse retina, like that of other mammals, contains ∼20 different circuits that compute distinct features of the visual scene [1, 2]. By comparison, only a handful of innate visual behaviors are known in this species--the pupil reflex [3], phototaxis [4], the optomotor response [5], and the cliff response [6]--two of which are simple reflexes that require little visual processing. We explored the behavior of mice under a visual display that simulates an approaching object, which causes defensive reactions in some other species [7, 8]. We show that mice respond to this stimulus either by initiating escape within a second or by freezing for an extended period. The probability of these defensive behaviors is strongly dependent on the parameters of the visual stimulus. Directed experiments identify candidate retinal circuits underlying the behavior and lead the way into detailed study of these neural pathways. This response is a new addition to the repertoire of innate defensive behaviors in the mouse that allows the detection and avoidance of aerial predators.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2013.08.015

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In mice, presentation of an expanding, overhead, black disc that simulates an aerial predator approach promotes rapid escape to an available shelter, followed by long periods of freezing.

    “In mice, the presentation of an expanding, overhead, black disc that simulates an aerial predator approach (a looming stimulus) promotes rapid escape to an available shelter, followed by long periods of freezing (Yilmaz and Meister, 2013).”

    From Ventral striatum dopamine release encodes unique properties of visual stimuli in mice (2023) · cites this paper as Yilmaz and Meister, 2013

    The Results section describes an overhead, expanding black disc that prompted rapid escape to a nest and, in some mice, extended freezing (page not provided). It does not describe freezing as following escape: it says the animals that did not flee responded by freezing. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The looming discs used were empirically determined to produce short-latency escape in C57Bl/6J mice.

    “During photometry recordings, mice were exposed to trains of five overhead, black, looming discs on a light gray background that we empirically determined produce short-latency escape in C57Bl/6J mice (Figure 1E, Video 2), consistent with previous studies (Evans et al., 2018; Yilmaz and Meister, 2013).”

    From Ventral striatum dopamine release encodes unique properties of visual stimuli in mice (2023) · cites this paper as Yilmaz and Meister, 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. [1]Masland RH The neuronal organization of the retina Neuron 2012 76 266 280 23083731 PMC3714606
  2. [2]Gollisch T Meister M Eye smarter than scientists believed: Neural computations in circuits of the retina Neuron 2010 65 150 164 20152123 PMC3717333
  3. [3]Chen SK Badea TC Hattar S Photoentrainment and pupillary light reflex are mediated by distinct populations of ipRGCs Nature 2011 476 92 95 21765429 PMC3150726
  4. [4]Bourin M Hascoet M The mouse light/dark box test Eur J Pharmacol 2003 463 55 65 12600702
  5. [5]Prusky GT Alam NM Beekman S Douglas RM Rapid quantification of adult and developing mouse spatial vision using a virtual optomotor system Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004 45 4611 4616 15557474
  6. [6]Fox MW The visual cliff test for the study of visual depth perception in the mouse Anim Behav 1965 13 232 233 5835839
  7. [7]Card GM Escape behaviors in insects Curr Opin Neurobiol 2012 22 180 186 22226514
  8. [8]Yamamoto K Nakata M Nakagawa H Input and output characteristics of collision avoidance behavior in the frog Rana catesbeiana Brain Behav Evol 2003 62 201 211 14573994
  9. [9]Sivyer B van Wyk M Vaney DI Taylor WR Synaptic inputs and timing underlying the velocity tuning of direction-selective ganglion cells in rabbit retina J Physiol 2010 588 3243 3253 20624793 PMC2976019
  10. [10]Oyster CW The analysis of image motion by the rabbit retina J Physiol 1968 199 613 635 5710424 PMC1365363
  11. [11]Weng S Sun W He S Identification of ON-OFF direction-selective ganglion cells in the mouse retina J Physiol 2005 562 915 923 15564281 PMC1665532
  12. [12]Kim IJ Zhang Y Yamagata M Meister M Sanes JR Molecular identification of a retinal cell type that responds to upward motion Nature 2008 452 478 482 18368118
  13. [13]Zhang Y Kim IJ Sanes JR Meister M The most numerous ganglion cell type of the mouse retina is a selective feature detector Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012 109 E2391 E2398 22891316 PMC3437843
  14. [14]Ölveczky BP Baccus SA Meister M Segregation of object and background motion in the retina Nature 2003 423 401 408 12754524
  15. [15]Roska B Werblin F Rapid global shifts in natural scenes block spiking in specific ganglion cell types Nat Neurosci 2003 6 600 608 12740583
  16. [16]Yonehara K Ishikane H Sakuta H Shintani T Nakamura-Yonehara K Kamiji NL Usui S Noda M Identification of retinal ganglion cells and their projections involved in central transmission of information about upward and downward image motion PLoS ONE 2009 4 e4320 19177171 PMC2629575
  17. [17]Pang JJ Gao F Wu SM Light-evoked excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs to ON and OFF alpha ganglion cells in the mouse retina J Neurosci 2003 23 6063 6073 12853425 PMC6740343
  18. [18]Sun W Li N He S Large-scale morphological survey of mouse retinal ganglion cells J Comp Neurol 2002 451 115 126 12209831
  19. [19]Münch TA da Silveira RA Siegert S Viney TJ Awatramani GB Roska B Approach sensitivity in the retina processed by a multifunctional neural circuit Nat Neurosci 2009 12 1308 1316 19734895
  20. [20]Sahibzada N Dean P Redgrave P Movements resembling orientation or avoidance elicited by electrical stimulation of the superior colliculus in rats J Neurosci 1986 6 723 733 3958791 PMC6568468
  21. [21]Blanchard RJ Hebert MA Ferrari PF Palanza P Figueira R Blanchard DC Parmigiani S Defensive behaviors in wild and laboratory (Swiss) mice: the mouse defense test battery Physiol Behav 1998 65 201 209 9855467
  22. [22]Apfelbach R Blanchard CD Blanchard RJ Hayes RA McGregor IS The effects of predator odors in mammalian prey species: a review of field and laboratory studies Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2005 29 1123 1144 16085312
  23. [23]Sotnikov SV Markt PO Umriukhin AE Landgraf R Genetic predisposition to anxiety-related behavior predicts predator odor response Behav Brain Res 2011 225 230 234 21801755
  24. [24]Muller JM Morelli E Ansorge M Gingrich JA Serotonin transporter deficient mice are vulnerable to escape deficits following inescapable shocks Genes Brain Behav 2011 10 166 175 20955517 PMC3963524
  25. [25]Mongeau R Miller GA Chiang E Anderson DJ Neural correlates of competing fear behaviors evoked by an innately aversive stimulus J Neurosci 2003 23 3855 3868 12736356 PMC6742203
  26. [26]Wiltgen BJ Sanders MJ Behne NS Fanselow MS Sex differences, context preexposure, and the immediate shock deficit in Pavlovian context conditioning with mice Behav Neurosci 2001 115 26 32 11256449
  27. [28]Fanselow MS Neural organization of the defensive behavior system responsible for fear Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1994 1 429 438 24203551

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yilmaz, M., & Meister, M.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Meister, Markus
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
23
Issue
20
Pages
2011-2015
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2078340953
Cited by
611
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 64 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
7.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY014737)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
defensive behavior, looming stimuli, escape behavior, freezing behavior, retinal circuitry, visual processing, predator avoidance, aerial predators
MeSH terms
Animals, Escape Reaction, Female, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neural Pathways, Photic Stimulation, Retina, Videotape Recording, Visual Perception, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review