The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Responses of cat retinal ganglion cells to brief flashes of light
Open accessAbstract
1. The responses of cat retinal ganglion cells to brief flashes of light have been illustrated and described with a view to providing material for comparison with psychophysical experiments in the scotopic (rod‐dominated) range of performance. 2. There is a minimum response duration of 50–70 msec no matter how brief the flash is made. This duration is reached with stimuli lasting 32 msec or shorter. 3. Reducing the background illumination obviously increases the latency of responses to stimuli at 4 times threshold intensity (about 10 msec increment per log. unit decrement) but has no obvious effect on the minimum response duration. 4. The relation between intensity and duration of a flash for threshold responses closely resembles that in human psychophysical experiments. The Bunsen—Roscoe law is applicable for flash durations up to 64 msec. 5. If equal amounts of energy are delivered in the form of a pair of flashes of varying separation rather than by rectangular pulses, the shape of the response changes more abruptly with the temporal factor. 6. Non‐linear performance is apparent for stimuli as weak as 4 times threshold. 7. A method is developed for quantitative analysis of individual responses. It is based upon cross‐correlation of the train of impulses with a Gaussian smoothing function and represents local impulse frequency as a smooth function of time. The method also improves the signal‐to‐noise ratio of post‐stimulus time‐histograms of the sum of many responses. 8. The measurement of variability of individual responses is the main result of the method; its magnitude indicates that it is a significant new factor limiting temporal resolution with suprathreshold stimuli.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat
Enroth-Cugell, C., & Robson, J. G. (1966) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008107 · Cited by 2,625
Cited by
Neuronal Synchrony: A Versatile Code for the Definition of Relations?
Singer, W. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80821-1 · Cited by 2,581
Shadlen, M. N., & Movshon, J. A. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80822-3 · Cited by 606
The Temporal Correlation Hypothesis of Visual Feature Integration
Gray, C. M. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80820-x · Cited by 541
Role of frontal eye fields in countermanding saccades: visual, movement, and fixation activity
Hanes, D. P., Patterson, W. F., & Schall, J. D. (1998) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1998.79.2.817 · Cited by 492
von der Malsburg, C. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80825-9 · Cited by 501
Metadata
- Authors
- Levick, W. R., & Zacks, J. L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1970-03
- Volume
- 206
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 677-700
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2005055304
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Responses of cat retinal ganglion cells to brief flashes of light. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009037
- The paper
- Levick, W. R., & Zacks, J. L. (1970). Responses of cat retinal ganglion cells to brief flashes of light. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009037
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.