Cited by 606Visual perception and processing mechanismsNeural dynamics and brain functionMultisensory perception and integration

Synchrony Unbound

Open access
Shadlen, Michael N., Movshon, J.Anthony·1999·Neuron

Abstract

In the early stages of visual processing, objects and scenes are represented by neurons with small visual receptive fields. Each neuron provides information about local features of a scene, but to describe a scene in terms of objects requires that these features be combined. Objects can cover wide areas of visual space and be partially occluded by other objects, so the problem of binding the separate representations of parts into coherent wholes is not a simple one. This “binding problem” has received considerable attention. Gestalt psychologists articulated a number of principles for grouping and organizing scene elements (Kö hler 1930; Koffka 1935; Kanisza 1979), and more recently the related problem of image segmentation has received a good deal of attention in computer vision (see, for example, Pal and Pal 1993, for a review). The binding problem is really best considered as a series of related problems, all of which require the combination of information from multiple sources. Information must be integrated across the visual field and combined according to specific attributes. Some of those attributes are pictorial features like line orientation, texture, color, simultaneity of appearance, and common motion, but others require more complex information about such things as 3D shape, lighting, and object surface properties (Gregory 1970; Marr 1982; Shimojo et al. 1989; Adelson 1993; Ullman 1996; Adelson 1999; Kersten 1999).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80822-3

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is not yet consensus on the role that gamma activity plays in cerebral functioning.

    “Thus, there is not yet consensus on the role that gamma activity plays in cerebral functioning (see Shadlen & Movshon (1999), for example, for a counter argument to the gamma hypothesis).”

    From Brain oscillations, hypnosis, and hypnotizability (2015) · cites this paper as Shadlen & Movshon (1999)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shadlen, M. N., & Movshon, J. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Movshon, J.Anthony
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-09
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
67-77
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1543794893
Cited by
606
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 19
FWCI
4.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • McKnight Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (RR00166, EY11378, EY02017)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
Keywords
binding problem, visual object recognition, feature integration, Gestalt grouping, image segmentation, visual receptive fields, scene representation, occlusion, multiscale integration
MeSH terms
Animals, Cerebral Cortex, Humans, Models, Biological, Neurons, Time Factors, Visual Cortex, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review