The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electrophysiological evidence for the existence of orientation and size detectors in the human visual system
Open accessAbstract
1. The evoked potential in response to a grating alternating in phase at 8 c/s was recorded as a function of contrast from the occiput of man. 2. It was found that a linear relation exists between the log. of contrast and the amplitude of the evoked potential. 3. Extrapolation to zero amplitude voltage of the regression line between the amplitude of the evoked potential and log. contrast predicts the psychophysical threshold. This law was found to hold over the wide range of spatial frequencies tested. 4. Below 3 c/deg the results are best fitted with two regression lines; one of these is generated from the foveal and the other from the parafoveal representation in the cortex. 5. The slope of the regression lines was found to be almost independent of either the spatial frequency or the area of the stimulus grating. 6. The slope of the regression lines could be markedly increased by using as a stimulus either two different spatial frequencies, or two different orientations, presented simultaneously. 7. Using the evoked potential the selectivity to orientation was found to be so high that a channel was not influenced by another orientation 15° away. 8. The channels selectively sensitive to spatial frequency were highly selective and were not influenced by another spatial frequency one octave removed in spatial frequency. 9. It is concluded that in man there exist neurones highly selective to both orientation and spatial frequency.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837 · Cited by 13,680
The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat
Enroth-Cugell, C., & Robson, J. G. (1966) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008107 · Cited by 2,625
Cited by
The steady-state visual evoked potential in vision research: A review
Norcia, A. M., Appelbaum, L. G., Ales, J. M., Cottereau, B. R., & Rossion, B. (2015) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/15.6.4 · Cited by 1,234
Physiological and anatomical evidence for a magnocellular defect in developmental dyslexia.
Livingstone, M. S., Rosen, G. D., Drislane, F. W., & Galaburda, A. M. (1991) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.88.18.7943 · Cited by 1,018
The orientation and direction selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex
De Valois, R. L., William Yund, E., & Hepler, N. (1982) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(82)90112-2 · Cited by 772
Electrophysiology of Cognition
Hillyard, S. A., & Picton, T. W. (1987) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.cp010513 · Cited by 391
Bodis-Wollner, I. (1990) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(90)90113-o · Cited by 296
Metadata
- Authors
- Campbell, F. W., & Maffei, L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1970-05
- Volume
- 207
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 635-652
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2053570064
- Cited by
- 606
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 30.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrophysiological evidence for the existence of orientation and size detectors in the human visual system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009085
- The paper
- Campbell, F. W., & Maffei, L. (1970). Electrophysiological evidence for the existence of orientation and size detectors in the human visual system. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009085
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.