The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A comparison of peripheral and rubrospinal synaptic input to slow and fast twitch motor units of triceps surae
Open accessAbstract
1. Post‐synaptic potentials (PSPs) evoked by electrical stimulation of a variety of input systems have been compared in triceps surae motoneurones innervating slow and fast muscle units, the speed of contraction of which was also determined. 2. Stimulation of high threshold afferents in both flexor and extensor muscle nerves, and of joint afferents, evoked polysynaptic PSPs which were predominantly hyperpolarizing in both fast and slow twitch motor units. 3. Volleys in cutaneous afferents in the sural and saphenous nerves evoked polysynaptic PSPs composed of mixtures of inhibitory and excitatory components. The inhibitory components were predominant in slow twitch motor units, while in fast twitch units there was a trend towards excitatory predominance. 4. Repetitive stimulation of the red nucleus caused predominantly inhibitory PSPs in slow twitch units and mixed or predominantly excitatory PSPs in fast twitch units. There was a correlation in the excitatory/inhibitory balance between PSPs of cutaneous and rubrospinal origin in those motoneurones in which both types of PSPs were studied. 5. The amplitudes of group Ia disynaptic inhibitory PSPs were found to be correlated with motor unit twitch type: IPSPs in slow twitch units were larger than those in fast twitch units. Rubrospinal conditioning volleys were found to facilitate group Ia IPSPs in both fast and slow twitch motor units. 6. The results suggest that there may be several basic patterns of synaptic input organization to motoneurones within a given motor unit pool. In addition to quantitative variation in synaptic distribution, there is evidence that qualitative differences in excitatory to inhibitory balance also exist in the pathways conveying input from cutaneous afferents and rubrospinal systems to triceps surae motoneurones. These qualitative differences are correlated with the motor unit twitch type.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
FUNCTIONAL SIGNIFICANCE OF CELL SIZE IN SPINAL MOTONEURONS
Henneman, E., Somjen, G., & Carpenter, D. O. (1965) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1965.28.3.560 · Cited by 2,294
Cited by
Dynamic Sensorimotor Interactions in Locomotion
Rossignol, S., Dubuc, R., & Gossard, J.-P. (2006) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00028.2005 · Cited by 1,096
Motor Units: Anatomy, Physiology, and Functional Organization
Burke, R. E. (1981) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.cp010210 · Cited by 782
Self-citationIntegration in Spinal Neuronal Systems
Baldissera, F., Hultborn, H., & Illert, M. (1981) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.cp010212 · Cited by 675
Regulation of soleus muscle stiffness in premammillary cats: intrinsic and reflex components.
Hoffer, J. A., & Andreassen, S. (1981) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1981.45.2.267 · Cited by 616
Heckman, C. J., & Enoka, R. M. (2012) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.c100087 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Burke, R. E., Jankowska, E., & ten Bruggencate, G.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1970-05
- Volume
- 207
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 709-732
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2043114245
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparison of peripheral and rubrospinal synaptic input to slow and fast twitch motor units of triceps surae. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009090
- The paper
- Burke, R. E., Jankowska, E., & ten Bruggencate, G. (1970). A comparison of peripheral and rubrospinal synaptic input to slow and fast twitch motor units of triceps surae. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009090
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.