The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Alterations of synaptic action in chromatolysed motoneurones of the cat
Open accessAbstract
1. Monosynaptic EPSPs in lumbosacral motoneurones undergoing chromatolysis were studied by intracellular recording from 7 to 20 days after section of the appropriate ventral roots of the cat. 2. The maximum monosynaptic EPSPs evoked in chromatolysed motoneurones by afferent volleys from the biceps‐semitendinosus or the triceps surae muscles ranged from 1·0 to 9·5 mV in amplitude. The time‐to‐peak of these EPSPs was 1·7 msec on the average. These values were significantly smaller and longer, respectively, than the amplitude and the time‐to‐peak of monosynaptic EPSPs observed in normal motoneurones. The long time‐to‐peak of EPSPs in chromatolysed motoneurones could not be accounted for by asynchronous transmitter release. 3. The mean number of unit EPSPs responding to a single afferent impulse (m) in chromatolysed motoneurones was comparable to that found in normal motoneurones. 4. The amplitude of unit EPSPs estimated from the mean EPSP amplitude and the m value following stimulation of a single afferent fibre was significantly smaller in chromatolysed motoneurones than in normal motoneurones. This difference was attributed to a difference in synaptic location. 5. The shape of monosynaptic EPSPs evoked in chromatolysed motoneurones by stimulation of single afferent fibres was analysed on the basis of Rall's compartment model. The analysis suggested that there is a lack of the excitatory synaptic input to the cell body in chromatolysed motoneurones. 6. Similar alterations were also found in IPSPs. The degree of change in synaptic responses evoked by stimulation of various pathways appears to depend on the synaptic location. 7. Following the study of the interaction of several inputs on the motoneurone and of their dependence on membrane potential, a tentative model of the synaptic distribution of different pathways is proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Purves, D. (1975) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011151 · Cited by 345
The nerve cell body response to axotomy
Grafstein, B. (1975) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/0014-4886(75)90170-3 · Cited by 313
Burke, R. E., & Rudomin, P. (1977) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.cp010124 · Cited by 276
Sasaki, S., & Iwata, M. (1996) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/0304-3940(96)12314-4 · Cited by 173
Long‐term effects of axotomy on neural activity during cat locomotion.
Gordon, T., Hoffer, J. A., Jhamandas, J., & Stein, R. B. (1980) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013283 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuno, M., & Llinás, R.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1970-11
- Volume
- 210
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 823-838
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2007484520
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alterations of synaptic action in chromatolysed motoneurones of the cat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009244
- The paper
- Kuno, M., & Llinás, R. (1970). Alterations of synaptic action in chromatolysed motoneurones of the cat. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009244
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.