Cited by 561Neuroscience of respiration and sleepSleep and Wakefulness ResearchNeonatal Respiratory Health Research

Respiratory movements and rapid eye movement sleep in the foetal lamb.

Open access
Dawes, G. S., Fox, H. E., Leduc, B. M., Liggins, G. C., Richards, R. T.·1972·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. In foetal lambs from 40 days gestation (0.27 of term) onwards delivered into a warm saline bath, apparently spontaneous breathing movements were present intermittently. They became deeper and more rapid with increasing age.2. In foetal lambs (from 0.66 of term) in which observations were made for many days after chronic implantation of tracheal, carotid and amniotic catheters, rapid irregular respiratory movements were present up to 40% of the time, and brief gasps also were seen.3. The presence of these movements was unrelated to the foetal carotid blood gas values over a wide range of spontaneous variation.4. These foetal breathing movements were accompanied by comparatively small alterations of pulmonary volume recorded from a tracheal flowmeter, insufficient to clear the tracheal dead space. Occasionally a more prolonged expiration led to the outward flow of fluid.5. A description is given of sleep and wakefulness in foetal lambs from 0.78 of term.6. Rapid irregular breathing was associated with rapid eye movement sleep as seen in a warm saline bath or, in utero, as inferred from records of eye movements and electrocortical activity.7. Respiratory movements were often associated with relatively large variations in foetal heart rate, blood pressure and descending aortic blood flow.8. Rapid irregular foetal breathing was unaffected by section or blockade of the cervical vagi, but was abolished by general anaesthesia.9. It is concluded that respiratory movements are normally but intermittently present in the foetal lamb over the greater part of gestation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009698

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dawes, G. S., Fox, H. E., Leduc, B. M., Liggins, G. C., & Richards, R. T.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1972-01
Volume
220
Issue
1
Pages
119-143
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W1975714289
Cited by
561
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
11.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
Keywords
REM sleep, fetal sheep, GASP, vagus nerve, general anesthesia, lung volume
MeSH terms
Amniotic Fluid, Anesthesia, General, Animals, Blood Pressure, Carbon Dioxide, Carotid Arteries, Catheterization, Chloralose, Electroencephalography, Female, Fetal Heart, Fetus, Gestational Age, Lung, Movement, Oxygen, Pentobarbital, Posture, Pregnancy, Regional Blood Flow, Respiration, Sheep, Sleep, REM, Trachea, Vagotomy, Vagus Nerve, Wakefulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review