The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Linear and nonlinear spatial subunits in Y cat retinal ganglion cells.
Open accessAbstract
1. The mechanism which makes Y cells different from X cells was investigated. 2. Spatial frequency contrast sensitivity functions for the fundamental and second harmonic responses of Y cells to alternating phase gratings were determined. 3. The fundamental spatial frequency response was predicted by the Fourier transform of the sensitivity profile of the Y cell. The high spatial frequency cut‐off of a Y cell's fundamental response was in this way related to the centre of the cell's receptive field. 4. The second harmonic response of a Y cell did not cut off at such a low spatial frequency as the fundamental response. This result indicated that the source of the second harmonic was a spatial subunit of the receptive field smaller in spatial extent than the centre. 5. Contrast sensitivity vs. spatial phase for a Y cell was measured under three conditions: a full grating, a grating seen through a centrally located window, a grating partially obscured by a visual shutter. The 2nd/1st harmonic sensitivity ratio went down with the window and up with the shutter. These results implied that the centre of Y cells was linear and also that the nonlinear subunits extended into the receptive field surround. 6. Spatial localization of the nonlinear subunits was determined by means of a spatial dipole stimulus. The nonlinear subunits overlapped the centre and surround of the receptive field and extended beyond both. 7. The nature of the Y cell nonlinearity was found to be rectification, as determined from measurements of the second harmonic response as a function of contrast. 8. Spatial models for the Y cell receptive field are proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat
Enroth-Cugell, C., & Robson, J. G. (1966) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008107 · Cited by 2,625
Cited by
Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex.
Movshon, J. A., Thompson, I. D., & Tolhurst, D. J. (1978) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012488 · Cited by 890
Eye Smarter than Scientists Believed: Neural Computations in Circuits of the Retina
Gollisch, T., & Meister, M. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.12.009 · Cited by 795
X and Y cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque monkeys.
Kaplan, E., & Shapley, R. M. (1982) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014333 · Cited by 601
Self-citationParallel visual pathways: A review
Lennie, P. (1980) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(80)90115-7 · Cited by 509
Sustained and transient mechanisms in human vision: Temporal and spatial properties
Legge, G. E. (1978) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(78)90079-2 · Cited by 445
Metadata
- Authors
- Hochstein, S., & Shapley, R. M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1976-11
- Volume
- 262
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 265-284
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2065621419
- Cited by
- 471
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Linear and nonlinear spatial subunits in Y cat retinal ganglion cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011595
- The paper
- Hochstein, S., & Shapley, R. M. (1976). Linear and nonlinear spatial subunits in Y cat retinal ganglion cells. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011595
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.