Cited by 303Muscle activation and electromyography studiesMuscle Physiology and DisordersMotor Control and Adaptation

Firing rate and recruitment order of toe extensor motor units in different modes of voluntary conraction.

Open access
Grimby, L, Hannerz, J·1977·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. The discharge properties of individual motor units in different modes of voluntary contraction were studied with electromyographic techniques in the short toe extensor muscle of normal man. 2. The short toe extensor muscle consisted of type I and type II muscle fibres in about equal proportion. In some subjects there was type-grouping so that recordings with sufficient selectivity could easily be obtained. 3. Certain motor units could be driven continuously, attained regular firing intervals even at a firing rate of 10/sec, increased slowly in firing rate with increase in contraction strength, had maximum firing rate below 30/sec during sustained contraction but above 60/sec in twitch contraction. 4. Other motor units could not be dirven continuously, did not fire repeatedly at rates below 20/sec, increased rapidly in firing rate with increase in contraction strength and attained firing rates above 100/sec. 5. There were intermediate forms between continuously firing low frequency motor units and intermittently firing high frequency motor units. 6. In a prolonged contraction of constant strength only continuously firing motor units were active. 7. On rapid accelerations, however, both continuously and intermittently firing motor units were active and played about the same role. 8. This applied also to prolonged series of accelerations as in rhythmically alternating movements. 9. In twitch contractions selective activation of intermittently firing motor units occurred if th…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011699

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Grimby and Hannerz reported orderly recruitment of motor units during rhythmically alternating movements.

    “Grimby and Hannerz (1977) reported orderly recruitment of motor units during rhythmically alternating movements.”

    From Velocity Specificity of Resistance Training (1993) · cites this paper as Grimby and Hannerz, 1977

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grimby, L., & Hannerz, J.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1977-01
Volume
264
Issue
3
Pages
865-879
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2006384192
Cited by
303
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
FWCI
9.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
motor unit firing rate, motor unit recruitment order, voluntary muscle contraction, twitch contraction, sustained contraction, muscle fiber type, type I muscle fibers, fast-twitch muscle, motor unit firing patterns
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Adult, Child, Preschool, Humans, Motor Neurons, Muscle Contraction, Muscles, Neural Conduction, Recruitment, Neurophysiological, Toes, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review