The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Voltage jump analysis of procaine action at frog end‐plate
Open accessAbstract
1. In the absence of procaine the end‐plate conductance evoked by suberyldicholine increases exponentially to a new level following a step hyperpolarization. In the presence of procaine the suberyldicholine‐evoked conductance first rapidly decreases and then slowly increases following a hyperpolarizing step. The fast relaxation has a time constant of ∼ 1 msec, and the slow relaxation a time constant of 10‐150 msec. 2. The existence and sign of these two relaxations is predicted by a sequential model in which procaine enters and blocks open but not closed end‐plate channels. The concentration dependence of the fast and slow relaxation time constants agrees well with the predictions of this model, and allows the apparent dissociation constant for binding of procaine within the open channel to be estimated at about 20 μ M at ‐80 mV membrane potential. 3. This apparent binding constant is voltage sensitive. It decreases e‐fold for 50 mV hyperpolarization, suggesting that the procaine binding site is electrically half way through the channel. 4. Procaine concentrations comparable to the dissociation constant for binding to open channels strongly depress the equilibrium current evoked by low suberyldicholine concentrations. This finding is not in accord with the sequential model. 5. A cyclic model in which procaine binds to both closed and open channels explains well the equilibrium observations. The affinity of procaine for closed channels is similar to its affinity for open channels, and is also increased by hyperpolarization. This model also fits well the kinetic observations, if it is assumed that blocked channels open and close much more slowly than unblocked channels. 6. The concentration dependence of the relaxation amplitudes disagrees with the predictions of the sequential model, but agrees well with the predictions of the cyclic model. 7. No other model appears to explain the various observations as economically as the cyclic channel blocking model. If the model is correct the ‘gate’ controlling the end‐plate channel must be in the inner half of the membrane.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Acetylcholine Receptor: An Allosteric Protein
Changeux, J.-P., Devillers-Thiéry, A., & Chemouilli, P. (1984) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.6382611 · Cited by 623
Neubig, R. R., Krodel, E. K., Boyd, N. D., & Cohen, J. B. (1979) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.76.2.690 · Cited by 349
On the nature of partial agonism in the nicotinic receptor superfamily
Lape, R., Colquhoun, D., & Sivilotti, L. G. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07139 · Cited by 337
The permeability of endplate channels to monovalent and divalent metal cations.
Adams, D. J., Dwyer, T. M., & Hille, B. (1980) · The Journal of general physiology · doi:10.1085/jgp.75.5.493 · Cited by 331
The channel‐blocking action of methonium compounds on rat submandibular ganglion cells
Gurney, A. M., & Rang, H. P. (1984) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.1984.tb10801.x · Cited by 100
Metadata
- Authors
- Adams, P. R.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1977-06
- Volume
- 268
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 291-318
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2120389819
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Voltage jump analysis of procaine action at frog end‐plate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011858
- The paper
- Adams, P. R. (1977). Voltage jump analysis of procaine action at frog end‐plate. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011858
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.