Cited by 241Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Carotid and cardiopulmonary baroreceptor control of splanchnic and forearm vascular resistance during venous pooling in man

Open access
Abboud, Francois M., Eckberg, Dwain L., Johannsen, U. James, Mark, Allyn L.·1979·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. This study evaluated the contribution of carotid and cardiopulmonary baroreceptors to reflex splanchnic and forearm vascular adjustments during venous pooling in man. We compared (a) responses to lower body suction which produces venous pooling with (b) responses to lower body suction plus simultaneous application of neck suction. The rationale was that simultaneous application of neck suction, which stretches carotid baroreceptors, would minimize the contribution of carotid baroreceptors to circulatory adjustments produced by lower body suction.2. Lower body suction at 40 mmHg decreased central venous pressure and arterial pulse pressure and increased forearm vascular resistance (plethysmography), splanchnic vascular resistance (indocyanine green dye clearance), and heart rate. Simultaneous application of neck suction prevented the tachycardia and most of the splanchnic vasoconstriction during lower body suction, but did not significantly attenuate the forearm vasoconstriction.3. The major findings in this study are first, that the splanchnic vasoconstrictor response during venous pooling is mediated primarily through carotid baroreceptors, and secondly, that carotid and cardiopulmonary baroreceptors produce strikingly contrasting and non-uniform regional vascular responses during venous pooling. Cardiopulmonary baroreceptors exert the predominant influence on forearm vascular resistance, but appear to have only a minor influence on splanchnic vascular resistance. Carotid…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012612

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abboud, F. M., Eckberg, D. L., Johannsen, U. J., & Mark, A. L.
Affiliations
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
  • University of Iowa (US)
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1979-01
Volume
286
Issue
1
Pages
173-184
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2067493906
Cited by
241
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
carotid baroreceptors, cardiopulmonary baroreceptors, venous pooling, splanchnic vascular resistance, forearm vascular resistance, neck suction, splanchnic vasoconstriction, tachycardia, central venous pressure, pulse pressure
MeSH terms
Abdomen, Adult, Blood Circulation, Carotid Sinus, Forearm, Heart, Humans, Lung, Male, Pressoreceptors, Reflex, Regional Blood Flow, Vascular Resistance, Vasoconstriction, Veins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review