The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Influence of electric fields on the excitability of granule cells in guinea‐pig hippocampal slices.
Open accessAbstract
1. Monosynaptic evoked potentials were recorded from the granule cell layer of slices of guinea‐pig hippocampus maintained in vitro. Current pulses of 25‐250 msec duration were passed across the slices, between gross electrodes in the bathing liquid. 2. Polarizing current modified the excitability of the granule cells as judged by changes in their population discharge during postsynaptic responses. All durations of polarization had at least qualitatively similar effects. Conventional current from dendrites to cell bodies increased excitability (and vice versa). This is consistent with altered membrane potential of a spike trigger zone, at or close to the granule cell bodies, imposed by the fraction of polarizing current which flows intracellularly. 3. In some experiments polarization also affected the presynaptic volley and (hence?) the synaptic potential. When this occurred it was in the wrong sense to explain the concomitant changes in population spike. 4. Focal polarization, where currents were applied across the cell body layer between a small electrode on the mid or outer dendritic regions and a remote gross electrode, altered granule cell excitability in the same direction as in (2). Thus conventional current injected at the dendritic electrode increased excitability. 5. The smallest effect polarizing currents caused extracellular voltage gradients of 5‐10 mV/mm, which is less than occurs in this tissue during synchronous activation of the neurons or during seizure activity. Therefore such field potentials could increased the synchrony of discharge of the granule cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Brunoni, A. R., Nitsche, M. A., Bolognini, N., Bikson, M., Wagner, T., Merabet, L., Edwards, D. J., Valero-Cabre, A., Rotenberg, A., Pascual-Leone, A., et al. (2012) · Brain stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2011.03.002 · Cited by 1,445
A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools
Woods, A. J., Antal, A., Bikson, M., Boggio, P. S., Brunoni, A. R., Celnik, P., Cohen, L. G., Fregni, F., Herrmann, C. S., Kappenman, E. S., et al. (2016) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2015.11.012 · Cited by 1,439
Batsikadze, G., Moliadze, V., Paulus, W., Kuo, M. ‐., & Nitsche, M. A. (2013) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2012.249730 · Cited by 1,017
Electrical coupling underlies high-frequency oscillations in the hippocampus in vitro
Draguhn, A., Traub, R. D., Schmitz, D., & Jefferys, J. G. R. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/28184 · Cited by 703
Self-citationCellular and molecular basis of epilepsy
McNamara, J. (1994) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.14-06-03413.1994 · Cited by 649
Metadata
- Authors
- Jefferys, J. G.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1981-10
- Volume
- 319
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 143-152
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2059974504
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of electric fields on the excitability of granule cells in guinea‐pig hippocampal slices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013897
- The paper
- Jefferys, J. G. (1981). Influence of electric fields on the excitability of granule cells in guinea‐pig hippocampal slices. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013897
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.