Cited by 703Neural dynamics and brain functionConnexins and lens biologyNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Electrical coupling underlies high-frequency oscillations in the hippocampus in vitro

Draguhn, A., Traub, R. D., Schmitz, D., Jefferys, J. G. R.·1998·Nature

Abstract

Coherent oscillations, in which ensembles of neurons fire in a repeated and synchronous manner, are thought to be important in higher brain functions. In the hippocampus, these discharges are categorized according to their frequency as theta (4-10Hz), gamma (20-80 Hz) and high-frequency (approximately 200 Hz) discharges, and they occur in relation to different behavioural states. The synaptic bases of theta and gamma rhythms have been extensively studied but the cellular bases for high-frequency oscillations are not understood. Here we report that high-frequency network oscillations are present in rat brain slices in vitro, occurring as a brief series of repetitive population spikes at 150-200 Hz in all hippocampal principal cell layers. Moreover, this synchronous activity is not mediated through the more commonly studied modes of chemical synaptic transmission, but is in fact a result of direct electrotonic coupling of neurons, most likely through gap-junctional connections. Thus high-frequency oscillations synchronize the activity of electrically coupled subsets of principal neurons within the well-documented synaptic network of the hippocampus.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/28184

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Beginning in 1998, evidence began to show that gamma synchrony, the best measurable correlate of consciousness, depended on gap junctions, particularly dendritic-dendritic gap junctions.

    “Beginning in 1998, evidence began to show that gamma synchrony, the best measurable correlate of consciousness, depended on gap junctions, particularly dendritic-dendritic gap junctions [49][50][51][52][53][54].”

    From Consciousness in the universe (2014) · cites this paper as [50]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Draguhn, A., Traub, R. D., Schmitz, D., & Jefferys, J. G. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Draguhn, A.
Venue
Nature
Published
1998-07
Volume
394
Issue
6689
Pages
189-192
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2030670571
Cited by
703
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 36
FWCI
20.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • MDC Repository (Max-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Connexins and lens biology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
high-frequency oscillations, hippocampus, electrical coupling, gap junctions, neuronal synchronization, population spike, gamma oscillations, theta oscillations, brain slices
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Bicuculline, Calcium, Female, Hippocampus, Male, Neurons, Oscillometry, Rats, Wistar, Gap Junctions, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, GABA Antagonists, Rats, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review