The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spatio‐temporal interactions in cat retinal ganglion cells showing linear spatial summation.
Open accessAbstract
The spatio‐temporal characteristics of cat retinal ganglion cells showing linear summation have been studied by measuring both magnitude and phase of the responses of these cells to drifting or sinusoidally contrast‐modulated sinusoidal grating patterns. It has been demonstrated not only that X cells behave approximately linearly when responding with amplitudes of less than about 10 impulses/sec to stimuli of low contrast but also that cells of another type with larger receptive field centres (Q cells) behave approximately linearly under the same conditions. These Q cells appear to form a homogeneous group which is probably a subset of the tonic W cells (Stone & Fukuda, 1974) or sluggish centre‐surround cells (Cleland & Levick, 1974). The over‐all spatio‐temporal frequency characteristics of cells showing linear spatial summation are not separable in space and time. The form of the spatial frequency responsivity function of these cells depends upon the temporal frequency at which it is measured while the temporal phase of their resonse measured at any constant temporal frequency depends upon the spatial frequency of the stimulus. The behaviour of X and Q cells is quite well explained by an extension of the model in which signals from centre and surround mechanisms with radially Gaussian weighting functions are summed to provide the drive to the retinal ganglion cell. While the general form of the temporal frequency response characteristics of these ganglion cells are probably provided by the characteristics of elements common to the centre and surround pathways, the spatio‐temporal interactions can be explained by assuming that the surround signal is delayed relative to the centre signal by a few milliseconds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat
Enroth-Cugell, C., & Robson, J. G. (1966) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008107 · Cited by 2,625
Self-citation
Cited by
Dacey, D. M., Liao, H.-W., Peterson, B. B., Robinson, F. R., Smith, V. C., Pokorny, J., Yau, K.-W., & Gamlin, P. D. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03387 · Cited by 1,333
An emergent model of orientation selectivity in cat visual cortical simple cells
Somers, D., Nelson, S., & Sur, M. (1995) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.15-08-05448.1995 · Cited by 860
Meister, M., & Berry, M. J. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80700-x · Cited by 434
A standard model for foveal detection of spatial contrast
Watson, A. B., & Ahumada, A. J. (2005) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/5.9.6 · Cited by 329
Self-citationThe most numerous ganglion cell type of the mouse retina is a selective feature detector
Zhang, Y., Kim, I.-J., Sanes, J. R., & Meister, M. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1211547109 · Cited by 313
Metadata
- Authors
- Enroth‐Cugell, C., Robson, J. G., Schweitzer‐Tong, D. E., & Watson, A. B.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1983-08
- Volume
- 341
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 279-307
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W1977097752
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatio‐temporal interactions in cat retinal ganglion cells showing linear spatial summation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014806
- The paper
- Enroth‐Cugell, C., Robson, J. G., Schweitzer‐Tong, D. E., & Watson, A. B. (1983). Spatio‐temporal interactions in cat retinal ganglion cells showing linear spatial summation. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014806
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.