Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 311

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Corticomotoneuronal cells contribute to long‐latency stretch reflexes in the rhesus monkey.

Open access
Cheney, P D, Fetz, E E·1984·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

To test the hypothesis that a transcortical reflex contributes to the stretch‐evoked long‐latency electromyographic (e.m.g.) response we documented the responses of identified corticomotoneuronal (c.m.) cells and their target muscles to perturbations of active wrist movements. Macaque monkeys performed ramp‐and‐hold wrist movements against elastic loads, alternating between flexion and extension zones; brief (25 ms) torque pulses were intermittently applied during the hold period. C.m. cells were identified by a clear post‐spike facilitation in spike‐triggered averages of forelimb muscle e.m.g. activity. Activity of c.m. cells and twelve wrist and digit flexor and extensor muscles was recorded during: (a) active ramp‐and‐hold wrist movements, (b) passive ramp‐and‐hold wrist movements, and (c) torque perturbations applied during the hold phase of active flexion and extension which either lengthened or shortened the c.m. cell's target muscles. Muscle‐lengthening perturbations evoked a reproducible pattern of average e.m.g. activity in the stretched muscles, consisting of two peaks: the first response (M1) had an onset latency of 11.2 +/‐ 2.1 ms (mean +/‐ S.D.), and the second (M2) began at 27.9 +/‐ 5.1 ms. Torque perturbations which shortened the active muscles also evoked a characteristic e.m.g. response consisting of an initial cessation of activity at 13.5 +/‐ 3.4 ms followed by a peak beginning at 33.9 +/‐ 3.0 ms. The responses of twenty‐one c.m. cells which facilitated wrist muscles were documented with torque pulse perturbations applied during active muscle contraction. Twenty of twenty‐one c.m. cells responded at short latency (23.4 +/‐ 8.8 ms) to torque perturbations which stretched their target muscles. For each c.m. cell‐target muscle pair, transcortical loop time was calculated as the sum of the onset latency of the c.m. cell's response to lengthening perturbations (afferent time) and the onset latency of post‐spike facilitation (efferent time). The mean transcortical loop time was 30.4 +/‐ 10.2 ms, comparable to the mean onset latency of the M2 peak (27.9 +/‐ 5.1). The duration of a c.m. cell's response to torque perturbations provides a further measure of the extent of its potential contribution to the M2 muscle response. In all cases but two, the c.m. cell response, delayed by the latency of the post‐spike facilitation, overlapped the M2 e.m.g. peak.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015155

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 311

Metadata

Authors
Cheney, P. D., & Fetz, E. E.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1984-04
Volume
349
Issue
1
Pages
249-272
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2054397243
Cited by
311
References
0
FWCI
7.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Corticomotoneuronal cells contribute to long‐latency stretch reflexes in the rhesus monkey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015155
The paper
Cheney, P. D., & Fetz, E. E. (1984). Corticomotoneuronal cells contribute to long‐latency stretch reflexes in the rhesus monkey. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015155

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.