Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 418

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Selective facilitation of different hand muscles by single corticospinal neurones in the conscious monkey.

Open access
Buys, E J, Lemon, R N, Mantel, G W, Muir, R B·1986·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. Post‐spike facilitation of e.m.g. activity by monkey motor cortex neurones has been investigated in different hand and forearm muscles. 2. Seventy‐eight neurones were recorded concurrently with between five and ten different muscles. Forty‐seven neurones were identified as cortico‐motor by the presence of post‐spike facilitation in the spike‐triggered average of at least one of the tested muscles. 3. All forty‐seven cortico‐motor neurones showed clear increases in activity during performance of a precision grip task by the monkey, and all of them were co‐activated with the sampled muscles. 4. To assess the divergence of facilitation from a single cortico‐motor neurone to different muscles, spike‐triggered averages were constructed with all of the concurrently recorded muscles. The number of muscles in the sample, and the number of muscles showing post‐spike facilitation, were corrected by excluding any post‐spike facilitation which could have arisen by cross‐talk between the different pairs of e.m.g. electrodes. 5. Most cortico‐motor neurones produced post‐spike facilitation in a restricted number of tested muscles. The mean number of post‐spike facilitation‐bearing muscles per cortico‐motor cell rose from 1.4 +/‐ 0.5 (S.D.) when five muscles were sampled to 2.0 +/‐ 1.5 when ten were sampled. On average, each cortico‐motor neurone produced post‐spike facilitation in 27% of the tested muscles. Only three of forty‐seven cortico‐motor neurones gave post‐spike facilitation in half or more of the tested muscles. 6. The distribution pattern of post‐spike facilitation among the muscles sampled with a given cortico‐motor neurone was not altered when the spike‐triggered averages were constructed from cortico‐motor cell and e.m.g. activity recorded during two different phases of the precision grip task, or during performance of a quite different, power grip, task. 7. Cortico‐motor cells which produced post‐spike facilitation in two or more different muscles often did so in muscles with synergistic functions. 8. It is suggested that cortico‐motor neurones may contribute to relatively independent finger movements by virtue of their selective facilitation of hand muscles leading to a fractionated pattern of muscle activity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp016342

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 418

Metadata

Authors
Buys, E. J., Lemon, R. N., Mantel, G. W., & Muir, R. B.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1986-12
Volume
381
Issue
1
Pages
529-549
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2081237042
Cited by
418
References
0
FWCI
27.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selective facilitation of different hand muscles by single corticospinal neurones in the conscious monkey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp016342
The paper
Buys, E. J., Lemon, R. N., Mantel, G. W., & Muir, R. B. (1986). Selective facilitation of different hand muscles by single corticospinal neurones in the conscious monkey. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp016342

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.