The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Corticospinal projections to upper limb motoneurones in humans.
Open accessAbstract
1. Magnetic stimulation was applied over the motor cortex in forty‐five normal human subjects and peristimulus time histograms (PSTHs) of the discharges of single motor units were used to record changes in the firing probability of individual spinal motoneurones of contralateral upper limb muscles. Recordings were obtained from 153 motor units from fourteen upper limb muscles. 2. For the majority of motor units the initial effect was a short latency facilitation. The estimated central conduction velocities and the rise times of the underlying excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) were compatible with monosynaptic facilitation by a fast corticospinal pathway. In some motor units the initial effect was a short latency inhibition. Other units showed no statistically significant changes in firing probability. The proportion of the tested motor units in each of these categories depended on the muscle. All of the sampled units of first dorsal interosseous (1DI) showed short latency facilitation, as did the majority of units in the forearm and the biceps brachii. More than half of the sampled motor units of triceps brachii and deltoid showed either no effect or were inhibited. 3. To compare the net short latency actions of the neurones activated by magnetic stimulation on various motoneurone pools, the magnitude of the short latency facilitation or inhibition in a given motor unit was normalized to the magnitude of the short latency facilitation in the 1DI motor unit of the same subject at the same stimulus intensity, and these data were pooled for a number of subjects. 4. 1DI motoneurones received strong net facilitation (estimated mean EPSP amplitude 2.9 +/‐ 0.2 mV), the motoneurones of forearm muscles and biceps brachii received weaker net facilitation and triceps brachii and deltoid received no net effect. 5. It is concluded that the short latency corticospinal projections to upper limb motoneurones in humans have a distinct pattern which is similar to that in other primates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stimulation of the cerebral cortex in the intact human subject
Merton, P. A., & Morton, H. B. (1980) · Nature · doi:10.1038/285227a0 · Cited by 1,094
Day, B. L., Dressler, D., Maertens de Noordhout, A., Marsden, C. D., Nakashima, K., Rothwell, J. C., & Thompson, P. D. (1989) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1989.sp017626 · Cited by 931
Responses in small hand muscles from magnetic stimulation of the human brain.
Hess, C. W., Mills, K. R., & Murray, N. M. (1987) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016621 · Cited by 757
Postspike facilitation of forelimb muscle activity by primate corticomotoneuronal cells
Fetz, E. E., & Cheney, P. D. (1980) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1980.44.4.751 · Cited by 751
ROTHWELL, J. C., THOMPSON, P. D., DAY, B. L., DICK, J. P. R., KACHI, T., COWAN, J. M. A., & MARSDEN, C. D. (1987) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/110.5.1173 · Cited by 585
Asanuma, H., & Ros�n, I. (1972) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00816161 · Cited by 370
Spatial organization of precentral cortex in awake primates. II. Motor outputs.
Kwan, H. C., MacKay, W. A., Murphy, J. T., & Wong, Y. C. (1978) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1978.41.5.1120 · Cited by 348
MOTOR CORTEX STIMULATION IN INTACT MAN: 2. MULTIPLE DESCENDING VOLLEYS
DAY, B. L., ROTHWELL, J. C., THOMPSON, P. D., DICK, J. P. R., COWAN, J. M. A., BERARDELLI, A., & MARSDEN, C. D. (1987) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/110.5.1191 · Cited by 338
Boyd, S. G., Rothwell, J. C., Cowan, J. M., Webb, P. J., Morley, T., Asselman, P., & Marsden, C. D. (1986) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.49.3.251 · Cited by 329
Corticospinal facilitation of hand muscles during voluntary movement in the conscious monkey.
Lemon, R. N., Mantel, G. W., & Muir, R. B. (1986) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp016341 · Cited by 300
Cited by
Descending Pathways in Motor Control
Lemon, R. N. (2008) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.060407.125547 · Cited by 1,599
Predictions not commands: Active inference in the motor system
Adams, R. A., Shipp, S., & Friston, K. J. (2013) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-012-0475-5 · Cited by 765
Intracortical Inhibition and Facilitation in Different Representations of the Human Motor Cortex
Chen, R., Tam, A., Bütefisch, C., Corwell, B., Ziemann, U., Rothwell, J. C., & Cohen, L. G. (1998) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1998.80.6.2870 · Cited by 495
Variability of motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation
Kiers, L., Cros, D., Chiappa, K. H., & Fang, J. (1993) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section · doi:10.1016/0168-5597(93)90115-6 · Cited by 477
Turton, A., Wroe, S., Trepte, N., Fraser, C., & Lemon, R. N. (1996) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Electromyography and Motor Control · doi:10.1016/0924-980x(96)95560-5 · Cited by 431
Metadata
- Authors
- Palmer, E., & Ashby, P.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-03
- Volume
- 448
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 397-412
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W1976353274
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 8.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Corticospinal projections to upper limb motoneurones in humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019048
- The paper
- Palmer, E., & Ashby, P. (1992). Corticospinal projections to upper limb motoneurones in humans. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019048
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.