The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Central changes in processing of mechanoreceptive input in capsaicin‐induced secondary hyperalgesia in humans.
Open accessAbstract
1. Capsaicin, the algesic substance in chilli peppers, was injected intradermally in healthy human subjects. A dose of 100 micrograms given in a volume of 10 microliters caused intense pain lasting for a few minutes after injection and resulted in a narrow area of hyperalgesia to heat and a wide surrounding area of hyperalgesia to mechanical stimuli (stroking) lasting for 1‐2 h. 2. Nerve compression experiments with selective block of impulse conduction in myelinated (A) but not in unmyelinated (C) fibres indicated that afferent signals in C fibres contributed to pain from capsaicin injection and to heat hyperalgesia, whereas conduction in afferent A fibres was necessary for the perception of mechanical hyperalgesia. 3. Electrical intraneural microstimulation normally eliciting non‐painful tactile sensations was accompanied by pain when the sensation was projected to skin areas within the region of mechanical hyperalgesia induced by capsaicin injection. 4. The threshold for pain evoked by intraneural microstimulation was reversibly lowered and pain from suprathreshold stimulation was exaggerated during the period of mechanical hyperalgesia, regardless of lidocaine anaesthesia of the cutaneous innervation territory of the stimulated fibres. 5. The results indicate that hyperalgesia to stroking on a skin area surrounding a painful intradermal injection of capsaicin is due to reversible changes in the central processing of mechanoreceptive input from myelinated fibres which normally evoke non‐painful tactile sensations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ochoa, J., & Torebjörk, E. (1983) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014873 · Cited by 467
Specific sensations evoked by activity in single identified sensory units in man
TOREBJÖRK, H. E., & OCHOA, J. L. (1980) · Acta Physiologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1748-1716.1980.tb06695.x · Cited by 212
Self-citation
Cited by
Central sensitization: implications for the diagnosis and treatment of pain
Woolf, C. J. (2011) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.030 · Cited by 4,771
Central sensitization: a generator of pain hypersensitivity by central neural plasticity
Latremoliere, A., & Woolf, C. J. (2009) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2009.06.012 · Cited by 3,913
The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: Scientific advances and future directions.
Gatchel, R. J., Peng, Y. B., Peters, M. L., Fuchs, P. N., & Turk, D. C. (2007) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.581 · Cited by 3,392
Coderre, T. J., Katz, J., Vaccarino, A. L., & Melzack, R. (1993) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(93)90161-h · Cited by 1,966
The induction of pain: an integrative review
Millan, M. J. (1999) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(98)00048-3 · Cited by 1,774
Metadata
- Authors
- Torebjörk, H. E., Lundberg, L. E., & LaMotte, R. H.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-03
- Volume
- 448
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 765-780
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2022898812
- Cited by
- 786
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Central changes in processing of mechanoreceptive input in capsaicin‐induced secondary hyperalgesia in humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019069
- The paper
- Torebjörk, H. E., Lundberg, L. E., & LaMotte, R. H. (1992). Central changes in processing of mechanoreceptive input in capsaicin‐induced secondary hyperalgesia in humans. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019069
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.