The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Task dependence of responses in first dorsal interosseous muscle to magnetic brain stimulation in man.
Open accessAbstract
1. The response of the first dorsal interosseous (1DI) muscle to non‐invasive magnetic and scalp electrical stimulation of the brain have been investigated during performance of different manual tasks. 2. The six tasks tested required activation of the 1DI muscle, either in isolation (during abduction of the index finger) or as part of a more complex pattern of muscle synergies (e.g. during power grip). The level of 1DI EMG activity across tasks was kept constant by providing subjects with visual feedback of their muscle activity. 3. In every subject (n = 14) magnetic stimulation produced larger responses during performance of complex tasks than during the simple index abduction task. The pooled results from all subjects showed that four of the five complex tasks were associated with significantly larger 1DI responses (paired t test, P < 0.05). 4. These results were confirmed at the single motor unit level for nine motor units recorded from six subjects. Subjects were requested to produce a steady discharge of the same motor unit during performance of different tasks. The probability of motor unit discharge in response to magnetic stimulation was significantly greater during complex tasks (rotation or pincer grips) than during abduction. 5. Scalp electrical stimulation was performed in three subjects with the cathode at the vertex and the anode over the contralateral motor cortex. The pattern of response amplitudes in the different tasks tended to parallel that obtained for magnetic stimulation, but the task‐related differences were smaller. 6. These results suggest that during performance of the different tasks, the corticospinal volleys evoked by magnetic stimulation may vary in amplitude. The task‐related cortical mechanisms that may contribute to this variability are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Input-output properties and gain changes in the human corticospinal pathway
Devanne, H., Lavoie, B. A., & Capaday, C. (1997) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/pl00005641 · Cited by 819
Capaday, C., Lavoie, B. A., Barbeau, H., Schneider, C., & Bonnard, M. (1999) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1999.81.1.129 · Cited by 342
Motor unit discharge and force tremor in skill- and strength-trained individuals
Semmler, J. G., & Nordstrom, M. A. (1998) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s002210050316 · Cited by 237
Self and other in the human motor system.
Schütz-Bosbach, S., Mancini, B., Aglioti, S. M., & Haggard, P. (2006) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.048 · Cited by 141
Metadata
- Authors
- Flament, D., Goldsmith, P., Buckley, C. J., & Lemon, R. N.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-05
- Volume
- 464
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 361-378
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2016117087
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Task dependence of responses in first dorsal interosseous muscle to magnetic brain stimulation in man. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019639
- The paper
- Flament, D., Goldsmith, P., Buckley, C. J., & Lemon, R. N. (1993). Task dependence of responses in first dorsal interosseous muscle to magnetic brain stimulation in man. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019639
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.