Cited by 141Action Observation and SynchronizationMotor Control and AdaptationFree Will and Agency

Self and other in the human motor system.

Open access
Schütz-Bosbach, Simone, Mancini, Benedetta, Aglioti, Salvatore M., Haggard, Patrick·2006·Current Biology

Abstract

Observation of another's action can selectively facilitate the brain's motor circuits for making the same action . A "mirror-matching mechanism" might map observed actions onto the observer's own motor representations . Crucially, this view suggests that the brain represents others' actions like one's own. However, this hypothesis has been difficult to test because the experience of one's own body differs from that of others' bodies with respect to viewpoint, morphological features, familiarity, and the hallmark feature of kinaesthetic experience. We used an established method for manipulating the sense of body ownership ("rubber-hand illusion") to compare effects of observing actions that either were or were not illusorily attributed to the subject's own body. We show that observing another's actions facilitated the motor system, whereas observing identical actions, which were illusorily attributed to the subject's own body, showed the opposite pattern. Thus, motor facilitation strongly depends on the agent to whom the observed action is attributed. This result contradicts previous concepts of equivalence between one's own actions and actions of others and suggests that social differentiation, not equivalence, is characteristic of the human action system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.048

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Continuous stroking may not be necessary to induce the illusion; the rubber hand illusion can be 'topped up' by occasional sequences of stroking with periods of no stroking in between.

    “Finally, we note that continuous stroking may not be necessary to induce the illusion. For example [23] showed that the RHI could be ‘topped up’ by occasional sequences of stroking with periods of no stroking in between.”

    From First person experience of body transfer in virtual reality (2010) · cites this paper as [23]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schütz-Bosbach, S., Mancini, B., Aglioti, S. M., & Haggard, P.
Affiliations
  • Fondazione Santa Lucia (IT)
  • University College London (GB)
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-09
Volume
16
Issue
18
Pages
1830-1834
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091806562
Cited by
141
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
FWCI
9.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Royal Society
  • Economic and Social Research Council
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
Keywords
mirror system, action observation, motor facilitation, rubber hand illusion, body ownership, self-other distinction, social cognition, motor representations, kinesthesia
MeSH terms
Cognition, Hand, Humans, Illusions, Imitative Behavior, Movement, Physical Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Visual Perception, Evoked Potentials, Motor, Recognition, Psychology, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review