Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 288

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Injury to muscle fibres after single stretches of passive and maximally stimulated muscles in mice.

Open access
Brooks, S V, Zerba, E, Faulkner, J A·1995·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. Our purpose was to investigate the initial mechanisms responsible for contraction‐induced injury. Most studies of mechanisms of contraction‐induced injury have been based on observations made either shortly after many repeated contractions at the peak of fatigue, or days after, at the peak of delayed onset injury. As a result, conclusions based on these studies are complicated by interactions of mechanical and biochemical events, as well as the passage of time. We studied the initial mechanical events associated with contraction‐induced injury immediately following single stretches of whole skeletal muscles of mice in situ. 2. We tested the hypothesis that immediately following a single stretch, the severity of contraction‐induced injury is a function of both strain and average force. Consequently, the work done to stretch the muscle would be the best predictor of the magnitude of injury. Extensor digitorum longus muscles were adjusted to optimum length for force (L(o)). Passive (not stimulated) and maximally activated muscles were exposed to single stretches of 10, 20, 30, 50 or 60% strain, relative to muscle fibre length (Lf), at a rate of 2 Lf s‐1. 3. The magnitude of injury was represented by the force deficit 1 min after the stretch expressed as a percentage of the maximum force prior to the stretch. The occurrence of injury was confirmed directly by electron microscopic analysis of the ultrastructure of muscle fibres that were fixed immediately following single stretches. 4. For active muscles, a single stretch of only 30% strain produced a significant force deficit, whereas for passive muscles, a larger strain was required. Stretches of greater than 50% strain resulted in greater force deficits for passive than for maximally activated muscles. For either condition, the work done to stretch the muscle was the best predictor of the magnitude of injury, accounting for 76% of the variability in the force deficit for maximally activated muscles, and 85% for passive muscles.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020980

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 288

Metadata

Authors
Brooks, S. V., Zerba, E., & Faulkner, J. A.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-10-15
Volume
488
Issue
2
Pages
459-469
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W1964690048
Cited by
288
References
3
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Injury to muscle fibres after single stretches of passive and maximally stimulated muscles in mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020980
The paper
Brooks, S. V., Zerba, E., & Faulkner, J. A. (1995). Injury to muscle fibres after single stretches of passive and maximally stimulated muscles in mice. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020980

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.