The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular correlates of the M‐current in cultured rat hippocampal neurons
Open accessAbstract
M‐type K+ currents (IK(M)) play a key role in regulating neuronal excitability. In sympathetic neurons, M‐channels are thought to be composed of a heteromeric assembly of KCNQ2 and KCNQ3 K+ channel subunits. Here, we have tried to identify the KCNQ subunits that are involved in the generation of IK(M) in hippocampal pyramidal neurons cultured from 5‐ to 7‐day‐old rats. RT‐PCR of either CA1 or CA3 regions revealed the presence of KCNQ2, KCNQ3, KCNQ4 and KCNQ5 subunits. Single‐cell PCR of dissociated hippocampal pyramidal neurons gave detectable signals for only KCNQ2, KCNQ3 and KCNQ5; where tested, most also expressed mRNA for the vesicular glutamate transporter VGLUT1. Staining for KCNQ2 and KCNQ5 protein showed punctate fluorescence on both the somata and dendrites of hippocampal neurons. Staining for KCNQ3 was diffusely distributed whereas KCNQ4 was undetectable. In perforated patch recordings, linopirdine, a specific M‐channel blocker, fully inhibited IK(M) with an IC 50 of 3.6 ± 1.5 μM. In 70 % of these cells, TEA fully suppressed IK(M) with an IC 50 of 0.7 ± 0.1 m m. In the remaining cells, TEA maximally reduced IK(M) by only 59.7 ± 5.2 % with an IC 50 of 1.4 ± 0.3 m m; residual IK(M) was abolished by linopirdine. Our data suggest that KCNQ2, KCNQ3 and KCNQ5 subunits contribute to IK(M) in these neurons and that the variations in TEA sensitivity may reflect differential expression of KCNQ2, KCNQ3 and KCNQ5 subunits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chapter 12 Potassium currents in hippocampal pyramidal cells
Storm, J. F. (1990) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(08)61248-0 · Cited by 743
Calcium-dependent current generating the afterhyperpolarization of hippocampal neurons
Lancaster, B., & Adams, P. R. (1986) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1986.55.6.1268 · Cited by 547 · cited 1×
“…a longlasting (> 1 s) after-hyperpolarization current following a depolarizing prepulse (Shah & Haylett, 2000), characteristic of pyramidal cells (Lancaster & Adams, 1986; Storm, 1990), but not of interneurons (Savic et al. 2001); (3) the presence of mRNA for the vesicular glutamate transporter…”
BackgroundGrosse, G., Draguhn, A., Höhne, L., Tapp, R., Veh, R. W., & Ahnert-Hilger, G. (2000) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.20-05-01869.2000 · Cited by 104
Cited by
Pathways modulating neural KCNQ/M (Kv7) potassium channels
Delmas, P., & Brown, D. A. (2005) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1785 · Cited by 686
Self-citationBrown, D. A., & Passmore, G. M. (2009) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00111.x · Cited by 676
Self-citationPan, Z., Kao, T., Horvath, Z., Lemos, J., Sul, J.-Y., Cranstoun, S. D., Bennett, V., Scherer, S. S., & Cooper, E. C. (2006) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4314-05.2006 · Cited by 585
Hu, H., Vervaeke, K., & Storm, J. F. (2002) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2002.029249 · Cited by 417
Gu, N., Vervaeke, K., Hu, H., & Storm, J. F. (2005) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2005.086835 · Cited by 363
Metadata
- Authors
- Shah, M. M., Mistry, M., Marsh, S. J., Brown, D. A., & Delmas, P.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 544
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-37
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W1964272828
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.