Cited by 686Ion channel regulation and functionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study

Pathways modulating neural KCNQ/M (Kv7) potassium channels

Delmas, Patrick, Brown, David A.·2005·Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Abstract

K(+) channels play a crucial role in regulating the excitability of neurons. Many K(+) channels are, in turn, regulated by neurotransmitters. One of the first neurotransmitter-regulated channels to be identified, some 25 years ago, was the M channel. This was categorized as such because its activity was inhibited through stimulation of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. M channels are now known to be composed of subunits of the Kv7 (KCNQ) K(+) channel family. However, until recently, the link between the receptors and the channels has remained elusive. Here, we summarize recent developments that have begun to clarify this link and discuss their implications for physiology and medicine.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrn1785

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • KCNQ channels are maintained in the open state by PI(4,5)P2; M1 receptor activation via Gαq/PLCβ1 causes a robust decrease in PI(4,5)P2 and channel closure; IP3 and DAG do not directly contribute; PI(4,5)P2 resynthesis reopens the channels.

    “The best characterised example is the KCNQ channels which are maintained in the open state allowing K+ to move freely (Figure 6B). Upon stimulation with the muscarinic agonist, M1 receptors are activated which couple to Gαq and activate PLCβ1. A robust decrease in PI(4,5)P2 causes channel closure; the PI(4,5)P2 hydrolysis products IP3 and DAG do not contribute directly to channel regulation. Res”
  • High levels of cAMP might potentiate these actions through PKA modulation of Kv7 channels, producing coordinated cAMP shunting of network inputs.

    “High levels of cAMP might potentiate these actions through PKA modulation of Kv7 channels95, thus producing a coordinated cAMP shunting of network inputs.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Delmas, P., & Brown, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • University College London (GB)
Venue
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Published
2005-11-01
Volume
6
Issue
11
Pages
850-862
ISSN
  • 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0048
OpenAlex
W2079373480
Cited by
686
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 35
FWCI
3.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Keywords
Kv7 potassium channels, KCNQ channels, M-channels, muscarinic receptors, neuronal excitability, receptor-channel coupling, G protein signaling
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Neurons, Receptors, Muscarinic, Second Messenger Systems, Ion Channel Gating, Up-Regulation, Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-Diphosphate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review