Cited by 25Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Presynaptic modulation by neuromedin U of sensory synaptic transmission in rat spinal dorsal horn neurones

Moriyama, Maiko, Furue, Hidemasa, Katafuchi, Toshihiko, Teranishi, Hitoshi, Sato, Takahiro, Kano, Tatsuhiko, Kojima, Masayasu, Yoshimura, Megumu·2004·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

Neuromedin U (NMU) is a brain–gut peptide first isolated from the spinal cord. Recent studies on NMU and its receptors have suggested a role of NMU in sensory transmission. Here we report on the localization of NMU in sensory neurones, and the actions of NMU in the substantia gelatinosa (SG) and the deep layer of the dorsal horn (laminae III–V) in adult rat spinal cord slices using the patch‐clamp technique. An immunohistochemical study revealed that NMU peptide was present in most of the dorsal root ganglion neurones. In the spinal cord, NMU‐immunoreactive neurones were located in the deep layer (laminae III–V), but not in the SG. However, NMU‐positive axon terminals were observed in the SG as well as the deep layer. Bath‐applied NMU (10 μ m) increased the frequency, but not amplitude, of miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (mEPSCs) in the SG and deep layer neurones by 146 ± 14% (P < 0.01, n= 17) and 174 ± 21% (P < 0.01, n= 6), respectively, without inducing any postsynaptic membrane currents recorded in tetrodotoxin. On the other hand, NMU did not affect miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents recorded in tetrodotoxin. These findings, taken together, suggest that NMU acts on the presynaptic terminals of the primary afferent fibres working as an autocrine/paracrine neuromodulator to increase mEPSC frequency of the SG and deep layer neurones. This may account for the spinal mechanisms of the NMU‐induced hyperalgesia reported previously.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.070110

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Sox5 dorsal excitatory family comprised Excit-14, Excit-15, Excit-16, Excit-17, Excit-18, and Excit-19 and expressed markers suggestive of a role in coping pain and mechanical nociception.

    “The Sox5 dorsal, the excitatory family was comprised of Excit-14, Excit-15, Excit-16, Excit-17, Excit-18, and Excit-19, and expressed markers suggestive of a role in coping pain and mechanical nociception46,52,56,63–67.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moriyama, M., Furue, H., Katafuchi, T., Teranishi, H., Sato, T., Kano, T., Kojima, M., & Yoshimura, M.
Affiliations
  • Kurume University (JP)
  • Kyushu University (JP)
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-09
Volume
559
Issue
3
Pages
707-713
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2158618039
Cited by
25
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
neuromedin U, presynaptic modulation, dorsal horn, substantia gelatinosa, dorsal root ganglia, primary afferent fibers, miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents, hyperalgesia
MeSH terms
Animals, Male, Synaptic Transmission, Neuropeptides, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats, Wistar, Presynaptic Terminals, Posterior Horn Cells, Rats, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review