Cited by 262Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationCell Image Analysis Techniques

A harmonized atlas of mouse spinal cord cell types and their spatial organization

Open access
Russ, Daniel E., Cross, Ryan B. Patterson, Li, Li, Koch, Stephanie C., Matson, Kaya J. E., Yadav, Archana, Alkaslasi, Mor R., Lee, Dylan I. +3 more·2021·Nature Communications

Abstract

Single-cell RNA sequencing data can unveil the molecular diversity of cell types. Cell type atlases of the mouse spinal cord have been published in recent years but have not been integrated together. Here, we generate an atlas of spinal cell types based on single-cell transcriptomic data, unifying the available datasets into a common reference framework. We report a hierarchical structure of postnatal cell type relationships, with location providing the highest level of organization, then neurotransmitter status, family, and finally, dozens of refined populations. We validate a combinatorial marker code for each neuronal cell type and map their spatial distributions in the adult spinal cord. We also show complex lineage relationships among postnatal cell types. Additionally, we develop an open-source cell type classifier, SeqSeek, to facilitate the standardization of cell type identification. This work provides an integrated view of spinal cell types, their gene expression signatures, and their molecular organization.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This paper harmonizes six published single-cell/nucleus RNA-sequencing datasets into a common reference atlas of postnatal mouse spinal cord cell types, identifying 16 major cell types and 69 neuronal populations. It validates combinatorial marker genes in adult tissue, infers embryonic lineage relationships, and provides a two-tiered classifier and web resource, SeqSeek.

Key findings

  • Integration of six studies yielded a final dataset of 52,623 cells/nuclei and 16 major cell types, including 69 neuronal clusters comprising 19,353 neuronal cells/nuclei.
  • Spatial location was the highest level of organization: dorsal and mid/ventral neurons separated before neurotransmitter status, and dorsal clusters were more robust and more readily identified in situ than ventral clusters.
  • In adult lumbar spinal cord, 71% of neurons (2057/2894) were confidently assigned to one of the 69 neuronal clusters, and an additional 9% (266/2894) to pairs of closely related clusters; 79 of 95 tested genes showed reliable expression.
  • Automated classification performed well: coarse cell-type accuracy was 89% for label transfer, 83% for a neural network, and 80% for an SVM; the two-tiered model classified 90% of nuclei from known independent clusters accurately and identified 28% of nuclei from unknown clusters.

Methods

  • Raw sequencing reads from the first six publicly available postnatal mouse spinal cord single-cell datasets were reprocessed uniformly, merged, and integrated with Seurat; results were compared with Harmony, Conos, and LIGER.
  • Clustering was performed in phases for all cells, all neurons, and targeted mid/ventral and motoneuron subsets; cell-type relationships were analyzed by principal-component distances, dendrograms, differential expression, and GO analysis.
  • Validation used high-content RNA in situ hybridization with 95 unique genes in ten overlapping sets on adult lumbar spinal cord sections from N = 3 animals, plus immunofluorescence and WFA-lectin staining; embryonic lineage was inferred by co-integration with an e9.5–e13.5 dataset, and classifiers were tested on an independent 10x single-nucleus dataset from four adult mice.

Limitations

  • Stated: the atlas is limited to RNA expression in postnatal mouse spinal cord and merges multiple time points; in situ validation is limited to adult lumbar spinal cord, so failure to detect some genes may reflect age, region, transient expression, or technical issues.
  • Stated: the analysis is population-based and likely underrepresents true biological variability, including noisy expression and continua of cell types; single-cell/nucleus profiling gives one perspective and may not capture connectivity, electrophysiology, or behavioral function.
  • Evident: classifier training used labels from the harmonized analysis because no gold standard exists, and several original datasets were included in training, so some performance estimates may be artificially high; ventral clusters were less robust and less separable than dorsal clusters.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-021-25125-1

Cites

138 of 138 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 112 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    The atlas reports a hierarchical structure of postnatal cell type relationships, with location providing the highest level of organization, then neurotransmitter status, family, and finally dozens of refined populations.

    “We report a hierarchical structure of postnatal cell type relationships, with location providing the highest level of organization, then neurotransmitter status, family, and finally, dozens of refined populations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    The authors show complex lineage relationships among postnatal cell types.

    “We also show complex lineage relationships among postnatal cell types.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Neurons located at the spatial mid-point between the dorsal and ventral sides of the cord (preganglionic cells and two excitatory populations near the central canal) were organized as a single branch.

    “Intriguingly, neurons that are located at the spatial mid-point between the dorsal and ventral sides of the cord (preganglionic cells and two excitatory populations near the central canal) were organized as a single branch (Fig. 3a; center), further underscoring the importance of spatial distribution as an organizing principle in the spinal cord.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    There was general agreement between the clusters reported by Blum et al. and the harmonized analysis, with differences.

    “We found general agreement between the clusters that they reported and our harmonized analysis with the following differences (Supplementary Fig. 7).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The bifurcation by spatial location occurred even before cell types split by neurotransmitter status.

    “Interestingly, this bifurcation occurred even before cell types split by neurotransmitter status (for example into dorsal excitatory or dorsal inhibitory types), a core feature of neuronal identity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 111
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 28
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The authors validated a combinatorial marker code for each neuronal cell type and mapped their spatial distributions in the adult spinal cord.

    “We validate a combinatorial marker code for each neuronal cell type and map their spatial distributions in the adult spinal cord.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The authors generated an atlas of spinal cell types based on single-cell transcriptomic data, unifying the available datasets into a common reference framework.

    “Here, we generate an atlas of spinal cell types based on single-cell transcriptomic data, unifying the available datasets into a common reference framework.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The three studies that FACS sorted neurons from the spinal cord predominantly gave rise to cells in the neuronal sub-clusters, as well as non-neural cells that most likely represented doublets.

    “The three studies that FACS sorted neurons from the spinal cord (Hayashi, Haring, and Baek datasets) predominantly gave rise to cells in the neuronal sub-clusters, as well as non-neural cells that most likely represented doublets.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The authors present SeqSeek, a web-based resource for querying the data by gene or cell type and for accessing an automated classification algorithm of any spinal cord cell or nucleus from raw sequencing data.

    “We now present SeqSeek, a web-based resource for querying this data by gene or cell type and for accessing automated classification algorithm of any spinal cord cell or nucleus from raw sequencing data.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Co-integration with embryonic cell types allowed inference of putative lineage relationships for each postnatal cell type and uncovered complex convergent contributions from multiple lineages to many cell types.

    “Co-integration with embryonic cell types allowed us to infer putative lineage relationships for each postnatal cell type and uncovered complex convergent contributions from multiple lineages to many cell types.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The motoneuron family includes alpha motoneurons (MNa) with relatively higher levels of Poln and Spp134, gamma motoneurons (MNg) with relatively higher levels of Esrrg and Htr1f, and preganglionic cells (PGC) expressing Gfra3, Nos1, and Fbn2.

    “The motoneuron (MN) family includes alpha motoneurons (MNa) which had relatively higher levels of Poln and Spp134, gamma motoneurons (MNg) which had relatively higher levels of Esrrg and Htr1f35, and the related preganglionic cells (PGC) which expressed Gfra3, Nos1, and Fbn236,37.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [35] Friese, A. et al. Gamma and alpha motor neurons distinguished by expression of transcription factor Err3. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA106, 13588–13593 (2009). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [36] Schaller, S. et al. Novel combinatorial screening identifies neurotrophic factors for selective classes of motor neurons. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E2486–E2493 (2017). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [37] Springell, D. A., Powers-Martin, K., Phillips, J. K., Pilowsky, P. M. & Goodchild, A. K. Phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 immunoreactivity identifies a novel subpopulation of sympathetic preganglionic neurons. Neuroscience 133, 583–590 (2005). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Dorsal clusters showed very high robustness with the bootstrapped co-clustering test, whereas mid and ventral clusters showed low to moderate robustness.

    “Dorsal clusters showed very high robustness with this measure, whereas mid and ventral clusters showed low to moderate robustness.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Integration-adjusted gene expression values markedly improved the ability to identify relationships between the clusters of the original studies and improved the top correlation score for each original cluster.

    “Moreover, the integration-adjusted gene expression values markedly improved the ability to identify relationships between the clusters of the original studies and also improved the top correlation score for each original cluster (Supplementary Fig. 1c, d).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Putative dorsal clusters were well separated from each other by long dendrogram branches, while putative mid and ventral clusters were much closer to each other in the reduced gene expression space.

    “This analysis also revealed that putative dorsal clusters were well separated from each other by long dendrogram branches, while putative mid and ventral clusters were much closer to each other in this reduced gene expression space (Fig. 3a).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The work revealed striking differences between dorsal and ventral neuronal cell types, both in their cell-type relationships and molecular trends.

    “This work revealed striking differences between dorsal and ventral neuronal cell types, both in their cell-type relationships and molecular trends.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The authors tested a range of automated classification algorithms and identified a two-tiered model based on label transfer and neural networks as the best method for classifying spinal cord cell types.

    “Finally, we tested a range of automated classification algorithms and identified a two-tiered model based on label transfer and neural networks as the best method for classifying spinal cord cell types.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    High throughput studies detected fewer genes per cell/nucleus than single well technical approaches, and studies using cells detected more genes per cell/nucleus but had higher levels of immediate early gene and stress gene expression than studies using nuclei.

    “A comparison across studies revealed that these high throughput studies detected fewer genes per cell/nucleus than studies that used single well technical approaches (the Hayashi, Haring, and Baek datasets), and studies that used cells (the Hayashi, Haring, Zeisel, and Baek datasets) detected more genes per cell/nucleus but had higher levels of immediate early gene and stress gene expression than”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The merged dataset contains more cells and nuclei than were analyzed in the original studies and a uniform set of genes.

    “As a result, this merged dataset contains more cells and nuclei than were analyzed in the original studies and a uniform set of genes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingreasoning

    The Sathyamurthy dataset was the only source of Schwann and peripheral glia cells.

    “The only study to dissect the spinal cord including the dorsal and ventral spinal roots (the Sathyamurthy dataset) was the only source of Schwann and peripheral glia cells that would be located in these roots.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The initial motoneuron family comprised only nuclei from the Sathyamurthy and Rosenberg datasets and contained only 565 MNs, and no refined sub-populations of motoneurons could be detected.

    “This family was only comprised of nuclei from the Sathyamurthy and Rosenberg datasets but we could not detected refined sub-populations of motoneurons. However, this included only 565 MNs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Among the three studies that examined all cell types, the early postnatal Rosenberg study showed enrichment of immature cells of oligodendrocyte lineage relative to the adult Sathyamurthy study, while the adolescent Zeisel study showed an intermediate distribution.

    “Moreover, among the three studies that examined all cell types, the early postnatal Rosenberg study showed enrichment of immature cells of oligodendrocyte lineage relative to the adult Sathyamurthy study, while the adolescent Zeisel study showed an intermediate distribution.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The authors observed 20 dorsal excitatory clusters, 14 dorsal inhibitory clusters, 10 deep dorsal/mid excitatory clusters, 7 deep dorsal/mid inhibitory clusters, 8 ventral excitatory clusters, 6 ventral inhibitory clusters, 3 cholinergic motoneuron clusters, and 1 cluster of cerebrospinal fluid contacting neurons.

    “We observed 20 dorsal excitatory clusters, 14 dorsal inhibitory clusters, 10 deep dorsal/mid excitatory clusters, 7 deep dorsal/mid inhibitory clusters, 8 ventral excitatory clusters, 6 ventral inhibitory clusters, 3 cholinergic motoneuron clusters, and 1 cluster of the cerebrospinal fluid contacting neurons (CSF-cN).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Using Seurat integration, cells and nuclei from all six studies were spatially interposed in a UMAP visualization of principal component space and separated into groupings that each expressed a panel of well-established cell type markers.

    “With this approach, the cells and nuclei from all six studies were spatially interposed in a UMAP visualization of principal component space (Fig. 1c) and separated into groupings that each expressed a panel of well-established cell type markers such as Snap25 (neurons), Mbp (oligodendrocytes), Aqp4 (astrocytes), and Ctss (microglia) (Fig. 1d, e).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [22] Nguyen, Q. H., Pervolarakis, N., Nee, K. & Kessenbrock, K. Experimental considerations for single-cell RNA sequencing approaches. Front Cell Dev. Biol. 6, 108 (2018). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [23] Stuart, T. et al. Comprehensive integration of single-cell data. Cell 177, 1888–1902.e21 (2019). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Cells or nuclei from each study were segregated from each other almost completely, indicating that the study of origin is a major source of variability in the dataset.

    “Unfortunately, the cells or nuclei from each study were segregated from each other almost completely, indicating that the study of origin is a major source of variability in the dataset (Fig. 1b).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The authors validated the differentially expressed patterns of several genes using in situ hybridization and at the protein level for CAMK2α and WFA-lectin, confirming predicted gene expression signatures that would differentially regulate plasticity in the dorsal and ventral horns.

    “We validated the differentially expressed patterns of several of these genes using in situ hybridization and also at the protein level for CAMK2α and WFA-lectin to reveal perineuronal nets, thereby confirming predicted gene expression signatures that would differentially regulate plasticity in the dorsal and ventral horns of the spinal cord (Fig. 3c–f).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    When either all genes or the top 500 highly variable genes were analyzed, there were weak overall correlations and very few alignments between clusters from different studies.

    “When either all genes or the top 500 highly variable genes were analyzed, there were weak overall correlations and very few alignments between clusters from different studies (Supplementary Fig. 1a, b, d).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Excit-17 included almost exclusively nuclei from the Rosenberg dataset and showed enriched expression of Dcx.

    “Excit-17 included almost exclusively nuclei from the Rosenberg dataset and showed enriched expression of the immature neuron marker Dcx.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Excit-5 expressed Pvalb and Cck, Excit-6 expressed Rorb and Cpne4, and Excit-7 had only nuclei from the Rosenberg dataset and expressed Dcx, suggesting an immature phenotype.

    “Excit-5 also expressed Pvalb and Cck, Excit-6 expressed Rorb and Cpne4, and Excit-7 was distinguished by having only nuclei from the Rosenberg dataset and expressed the immature neuron marker Dcx, suggesting an immature phenotype.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The Reln family clusters expressed enriched levels of Car12 (particularly Excit-9 and Excit-10), Trhr (Excit-8), Npr1 (Excit-9 and Excit-10), Nmur2 (Excit-10), and Grp (Excit-9).

    “These clusters expressed enriched levels of Car12 (in particular in Excit-9 and Excit-10), the neuropeptide receptors Trhr (Excit-8), Npr1 (Excit-9 and Excit-10), and Nmur2 (Excit-10), and the neuropeptide Grp (Excit-9).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Inhib-6 and Inhib-7 expressed Cdh3 and were distinguished by co-expression of Kcnip2 and Pvalb in Inhib-7.

    “Inhib-6 and Inhib-7 expressed Cdh3 and were distinguished by co-expression of Kcnip2 and Pvalb in Inhib-7.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingown data

    The Prkcg family was defined by Prkcg together with Cck and Trh (Excit-3) and Nts (Excit-4).

    “Prkcg is a classic marker gene in the spinal cord and defined this family together with the neuropeptides Cck and Trh (Excit-3) and Nts (Excit-4).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Inhib-8 contained only low levels of Cdh3 in this analysis, but Cdh3 expression was confirmed by in situ hybridization, and Inhib-8 was included in the Cdh3 family based on proximity in principal component space; Inhib-8 also expressed Klhl14.

    “While Inhib-8 contained only low levels of Cdh3 in this analysis, Cdh3 expression was confirmed by in situ hybridization and this cluster was included in this family based on proximity in principal component space as reflected in the UMAP and dendrogram analysis. Inhib-8 also expressed Klhl14.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The Cpne4 dorsal excitatory family comprised Excit-1 and Excit-2; Excit-1 was a rare subset expressing Dach2, and Excit-2 was more prevalent and co-expressed Prkcg and Cbln2.

    “The Cpne4 dorsal, excitatory family was comprised of Excit-1 and Excit-2. Excit-1 was a rare subset, both in the harmonized clusters and in the in situ counts, that also expressed Dach2. Excit-2 was more prevalent and co-expressed Prkcg as well as Cbln2.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The Megf11 cluster (Excit-20) displayed features of dorsal and mid excitatory neurons, being located in lamina 4/5 and grouped with mid neurons in principal component space.

    “The Megf11 cluster (Excit-20) displayed features of dorsal excitatory neurons and mid excitatory neurons, being located in lamina 4/5 and being grouped with mid neurons in principal component space in the UMAP and dendrogram analysis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There were two discrepancies between sequencing and in situ hybridization data in the Prkcg family: Cck was present at high levels in Excit-3 in sequencing but not detected in most Prkcg-expressing cells of adult spinal cord, and Prkcg was not enriched in Excit-4 in sequencing but was readily detected with Nts and Calb1 in adult tissue.

    “Of note, there were two discrepancies in this family between the sequencing data and the in situ hybridization data: Cck was present at high levels in the Excit-3 in the sequencing data but we did not detect Cck in most Prkcg-expressing cells of the adult spinal cord and Prkcg was not enriched in Excit-4 in the sequencing data but was readily detected with Nts and Calb1 in this cluster in adult t”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Inhib-1 expressed Sorcs3, Inhib-3 expressed Nppc and Nrgn, Inhib-4 expressed Rxfp2, Inhib-5 did not express these other genes, and Inhib-2 expressed Sorcs3 and Adamts5.

    “In addition to Rorb, Inhib-1 expressed Sorcs3, Inhib-3 expressed Nppc as well as Nrgn, Inhib-4 expressed Rxfp2, and Inhib-5 did not express these other genes. Inhib-2 expressed Sorcs3 and Adamts5.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Both Excit-3 and Excit-4 expressed Calb1, although Calb1 was not specific to these clusters.

    “Both subsets also expressed Calb1, although it was not specific to these clusters.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The CSF-cN cluster was very distinct from other neuronal populations, inhibitory, and expressed Sox2, Gata2, and Gata3, suggesting an immature phenotype.

    “This cluster was very distinct from other neuronal populations, inhibitory, and also expressed the early neuron marker Sox2 and the V2b lineage markers Gata2 and Gata3, suggesting an immature phenotype.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The Rreb1 dorsal excitatory family comprised Excit-12 and Excit-13, which expressed Satb1 and either Zim1 (Excit-12) or Nmur2 and Crh (Excit-13).

    “The Rreb1 dorsal, excitatory family was comprised of Excit-12 and Excit-13. These clusters also expressed Satb1 and either Zim1 (Excit-12) or Nmur2 and Crh (Excit-13).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    PGCs were clustered into 23 subtypes that varied by spinal cord level, and MNa were clustered into 14 subtypes that also varied by spinal level.

    “PGCs were clustered into 23 subtypes that varied by spinal cord level and MNa were clustered into 14 subtypes that also varied by spinal level.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Within the Sox5 family, Excit-14 and Excit-15 were slightly separated and similar to Rreb1 family clusters, expressing Col5a2 (Excit-14) or Col5a2 and Enpp1 (Excit-15).

    “Within this family, Excit-14 and Excit-15 were slightly separated and also similar to the Rreb1 family clusters and expressed Col5a2 (Excit-14) or Col5a2 and Enpp1 (Excit-15).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Excit-16, Excit-18, and Excit-19 expressed Tac1 (Excit-16), Nmu-hi/Tac2-lo (Excit-18), and Tac2hi/Nmu-lo (Excit-19).

    “Excit-16, Excit-18, and Excit-19 expressed the neuropeptides Tac1 (Excit-16), Nmu-hi/Tac2-lo (Excit-18), and Tac2hi/Nmu-lo (Excit-19).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Each cluster in the Pdyn family expressed Pdyn; Inhib-10 also expressed Gal and Mlxipl, and Inhib-11 also expressed Gal only; the family clusters also expressed Rorb and Nrgn.

    “Each of these clusters expressed Pdyn, while Inhib-10 also expressed Gal and Mlxipl and Inhib-11 also expressed Gal only. Of note, the clusters in this family also expressed Rorb and Nrgn.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Dual contributions of dI5.5 and dI2.1 to Excit-20 and of V1 and V2b to Inhib-27 were observed.

    “Dual contributions of dI5.5 and dI2.1 to Excit-20 and of V1 and V2b to Inhib-27 were also observed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Developmental lineage is a powerful and influential framework for categorizing spinal neurons.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The model showed very high confidence scores for correct predictions, but performance varied with cell type prevalence.

    “The model showed very high confidence scores for correct predictions; however, performance varied with cell type prevalence suggesting a target for improving the model in the future (Supplementary Fig. 11).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: There is no existing gold standard for spinal cord cell identities.
    • Rests on an assumption: The harmonized analysis cell type labels are adequate as training labels for machine learning classifiers.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Excit-35 also expressed Vamp1, Pou3f1, Shox2, and Pou6f2, and Excit-36 expressed Esrrg.

    “Excit-35 also expressed Vamp1, Pou3f1, Shox2, and Pou6f2 and Excit-36 expressed Esrrg.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Nearly all cells and nuclei in the remaining ME family were from the Rosenberg and Sathyamurthy datasets, and Excit-26 was predominantly from the Rosenberg dataset.

    “Of note, nearly all of the cells and nuclei in this family were from the Rosenberg and Sathyamurthy datasets and Excit-26 in particular was predominantly from the Rosenberg dataset.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    A neural network model with one hidden layer (256 nodes) and an SGD optimizer showed the best performance (overall accuracy 80%) for the second tier and was selected for further work.

    “A neural network model with one hidden layer (256 nodes) and an SGD optimizer showed the best performance (overall accuracy of 80%) and was selected for further work.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: There is no existing gold standard for spinal cord cell identities.
    • Rests on an assumption: The harmonized analysis cell type labels are adequate as training labels for machine learning classifiers.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Pou6f2 was expressed in the deep dorsal horn and dorsal part of the ventral horn and was enriched in mid-excitatory (Excit-21, Excit-28, Excit-30), ventral excitatory (Excit-34 and Excit-35), and ventral inhibitory (Inhib-24) clusters located within this domain.

    “For example, Pou6f2 was expressed in the deep dorsal horn and in the dorsal part of the ventral horn and was enriched in mid-excitatory (Excit-21, Excit-28, and Excit 30), ventral excitatory (Excit-34 and Excit-35), and ventral inhibitory (Inhib-24) clusters that are located within this domain.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The Chat dorsal inhibitory cluster Inhib-14 was a deep dorsal (lamina 4), inhibitory and cholinergic population that also expressed Nos1.

    “The Chat dorsal inhibitor cluster Inhib-14 was a deep dorsal (lamina 4), inhibitory and cholinergic population and also expressed Nos180–82.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [80] Laing, I., Todd, A. J., Heizmann, C. W. & Schmidt, H. H. Subpopulations of GABAergic neurons in laminae I-III of rat spinal dorsal horn defined by coexistence with classical transmitters, peptides, nitric oxide synthase or parvalbumin. Neuroscience 61, 123–132 (1994). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [81] Kluchová, D. et al. Partial colocalization of NADPH-diaphorase and acetylcholinesterase positivity in spinal cord neurons. Physiol. Res. 49, 151–155 (2000).

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [82] Mesnage, B. et al. Morphological and functional characterization of cholinergic interneurons in the dorsal horn of the mouse spinal cord. J. Comp. Neurol. 519, 3139–3158 (2011). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Nearly all cells and nuclei in the ME/Lmx1b family were from the Rosenberg and Sathyamurthy datasets.

    “Of note, nearly all of the cells and nuclei in this family were from the Rosenberg and Sathyamurthy datasets.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Nfib was expressed in the medial deep dorsal horn (mid) spinal cord and was enriched in both excitatory (Excit-23, Excit-25, Excit-30) and inhibitory (Inhib-15 and Inhib-21) clusters.

    “Similarly, Nfib was expressed in the medial deep dorsal horn (mid) spinal cord and was enriched in both excitatory (Excit-23, Excit-25, and Excit-30) and inhibitory (Inhib-15 and Inhib-21) clusters.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Inhib-12 and Inhib-13 expressed Npy and were distinguished by low levels of Vgf (Inhib-12) or expression of Qrfpr (Inhib-13).

    “These clusters expressed Npy and were distinguished by low levels of Vgf (Inhib-12) or by expression of Qrfpr (Inhib-13).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Other markers subdivided the ME/Lmx1b clusters: Nms (Excit-21), Bcl11a (Excit-22 through Excit-25), Satb1 and Cdh23 (Excit-23, Excit-24, and Excit-25), Cep112 (Excit-23 and Excit-24), and Prox1 (Excit-25).

    “Other markers sub-divided the clusters in a combinatorial manner, including Nms (Excit-21), Bcl11a (Excit-22 through Excit-25), Satb1 and Cdh23 (Excit-23, Excit-24, and Excit-25), Cep112 (Excit-23 and Excit-24), and Prox1 (Excit-25).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    All three strategies (label transfer, SVM, neural network) performed well on coarse cell type classification, with label transfer showing the best performance (overall accuracy 89%), followed by neural network (83%) and SVM (80%).

    “All three strategies performed well, with label transfer showing the best performance (overall accuracy of 89%), followed by the neural network (83%), and then the SVM (80%) (Fig. 6a and Supplementary Table 6).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: There is no existing gold standard for spinal cord cell identities.
    • Rests on an assumption: The harmonized analysis cell type labels are adequate as training labels for machine learning classifiers.
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Co-integration of the merged dataset of six postnatal studies with neurons from a single-cell sequencing atlas of e9.5 to e13.5 mouse spinal cord and analysis of seven studies together revealed long trajectories of embryonic cells leading towards particular cluster families, allowing inference of developmental relationships.

    “We found that long trajectories of embryonic cells led towards particular cluster families, which allowed us to infer developmental relationships (Fig. 5b).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Developmental lineage is a powerful and influential framework for categorizing spinal neurons.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The molecular identities of the cardinal classes were confirmed by classic marker analysis, and these marker genes often extended into the postnatal cell type domains.

    “The molecular identities of the cardinal classes were confirmed by classic marker analysis (Fig. 5c) and these marker genes often extended into the postnatal cell type domains as well.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Developmental lineage is a powerful and influential framework for categorizing spinal neurons.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Inhib-15 expressed Prox1, Gabra1, and Nfib; Inhib-16 expressed Gpc3 and Sema5b; Inhib-17 expressed Satb2; Inhib-18 expressed Sema5b; Inhib-19 expressed Ccbe1 and Pou6f2; Inhib-20 expressed higher levels of Tfap2b and Zfhx3; Inhib-21 expressed Nfib and had only Gad2 and not Slc6a5 and was mainly from the Rosenberg dataset.

    “Inhib-15 expressed Prox1, Gabra1, and Nfib, Inhib-16 expressed Gpc3 and Sema5b, Inhib-17 expressed Satb2, Inhib-18 expressed Sema5b, Inhib-19 expressed Ccbe1 and Pou6f2, Inhib-20 expressed higher levels of Tfap2b as well as Zfhx3, and Inhib-21 expressed Nfib and was distinguished by having only Gad2 and not Slc6a5 and was mainly derived from the Rosenberg dataset.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Excit-26 expressed Nfib, Excit-27 expressed Adamts2, Excit-28 expressed Chat and Pitx2 and likely corresponds to V0c neurons, and Excit-29 expressed Pmfbp1.

    “Excit-26 expressed Nfib, Excit-27 expressed Adamts2, Excit-28 expressed Chat and Pitx2 and thus likely corresponds to V0c neurons, and Excit-29 expressed Pmfbp1.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The Clarke's column marker gene Gdnf was expressed at very low levels in the merged dataset but was present in several Excit-30 cells.

    “The Clarke’s column marker gene, Gdnf, was expressed at very low levels in the merged dataset, but was present in several Excit-30 cells.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The analysis supported a division of deep dorsal horn excitatory neurons into two overall groups (ME/Lmx1b family more closely related to dI5, other ME clusters more closely related to dI1-dI3) and a division of ventral excitatory neurons into two groups (Excit-31 through Excit-34 closer to dI1-3 and Excit-35 through Excit-37 closer to V0, V2a, and V3 populations).

    “This analysis also supported a division of deep dorsal horn excitatory neurons into two overall groups (with the ME/Lmx1b family being more closely related to dI5, while the other ME clusters are more closely related to dI1-dI3) and a division of ventral excitatory neurons into two groups (with Excit-31 through Excit-34 being closer to dI1-3 and Excit-35 through Excit-37 being closer to V0, V2a, a”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Developmental lineage is a powerful and influential framework for categorizing spinal neurons.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Model performance varied with the co-clustering frequency of each cluster and with the ability to identify cell types in situ; these measures can be used to set a reasonable expectation for neural network performance.

    “We found that the model performance varied with the co-clustering frequency of each cluster and with the ability to identify cell types in situ and we propose that these measures can be used to set a reasonable expectation for neural network performance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: There is no existing gold standard for spinal cord cell identities.
    • Rests on an assumption: The harmonized analysis cell type labels are adequate as training labels for machine learning classifiers.
    • Rests on an assumption: Perfect performance would require perfect and invariable biological data: discrete cell types that express completely distinct patterns of gene expression and experimental data without natural heterogeneity, doublets, low-quality cells, or other sources of indeterminate data.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Excit-37 expressed low levels of the V3 marker gene Sim1 as well as Rnf220.

    “Excit-37 expressed low levels of the V3 marker gene Sim1 as well as Rnf220.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    These ventral excitatory clusters could be distinguished by Gm26673, Syt2, and Prlr (Excit-31), Mdga1 and Prlr (Excit-32), and Bnc2 and Pou6f2 (Excit-34).

    “These clusters could be distinguished by Gm26673, Syt2, and Prlr (Excit-31), Mdga1 and Prlr (Excit-32), and Bnc2 and Pou6f2 (Excit-34).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For classification of 69 neuronal sub-types, a linear model (no regularization, SGD optimizer) showed the best performance, with an overall test accuracy of 85%.

    “We found that a linear model (with no regularization and with an SGD optimizer) showed the best performance, with an overall test accuracy of 85% (Fig. 6b and Supplementary Table 6).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: There is no existing gold standard for spinal cord cell identities.
    • Rests on an assumption: The harmonized analysis cell type labels are adequate as training labels for machine learning classifiers.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Ventral clusters are much more similar to each other, with close or overlapping distributions in principal component space and overlapping gene expression patterns.

    “In contrast, ventral clusters are much more similar to each other, with close or overlapping distributions in principal component space and overlapping gene expression patterns.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Dorsal clusters are distinct from each other with clearly separated individual cell types that can be grouped loosely into families.

    “Dorsal clusters are distinct from each other with clearly separated individual cell types that can be grouped loosely into families.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Three very different methods - single-cell data clustering, multiplexed in situ hybridization, and an artificial intelligence neural network - all showed a relatively weak ability to classify ventral cell types into discrete types and a relatively strong but still imperfect ability to classify dorsal cell types.

    “For example, three very different methods – single-cell data clustering, multiplexed in situ hybridization, and an artificial intelligence neural network – all showed a relatively weak ability to classify ventral cell types into discrete types and a relatively strong but still imperfect ability to classify dorsal cell types.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Differential gene expression and gene ontology analysis revealed that learning-related genes are enriched in the dorsal horn while structural stability-related genes are enriched in the ventral horn.

    “Differential gene expression and gene ontology analysis revealed that learning-related genes are enriched in the dorsal horn while structural stability-related genes are enriched in the ventral horn.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The neural network model was at least as accurate as other methods such as Seurat-based clustering and high-content in situ hybridization and was orders of magnitude faster.

    “The neural network model was at least as accurate as other methods such as Seurat-based clustering and high-content in situ hybridization and was orders of magnitude faster.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: There is no existing gold standard for spinal cord cell identities.
    • Rests on an assumption: The harmonized analysis cell type labels are adequate as training labels for machine learning classifiers.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Several cell types were not expected to be present in the independent dataset (Schwann cells, peripheral glia, meninges 2, PGC, Excitatory-7, Excitatory-17) based on dissection method, lumbar region, and adult age; as expected, these cell types were not predicted by the two-tiered model.

    “Of note, several cell types were not expected to be present in the independent dataset, including Schwann cells, peripheral glia, and meninges 2 (based on the surgical dissection method used that did not include spinal roots or outer layers of meninges) and including PGC, Excitatory-7, and Excitatory-17 (based on the lumbar region and adult age that was used). As expected, these cell types were”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: There is no existing gold standard for spinal cord cell identities.
    • Rests on an assumption: The harmonized analysis cell type labels are adequate as training labels for machine learning classifiers.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Several mid/ventral cell types were not detected in the independent dataset while two ventral clusters (Excitatory-31 and Inhibitory-27) were over-represented.

    “In particular, several mid/ventral cell types were not detected in the independent dataset while two ventral clusters (Excitatory-31 and Inhibitory-27) were over-represented (Fig. 6 and Supplementary Fig. 13).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: There is no existing gold standard for spinal cord cell identities.
    • Rests on an assumption: The harmonized analysis cell type labels are adequate as training labels for machine learning classifiers.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    This work led to the discovery of gene expression signatures for plasticity in the dorsal horn and for structural stability in the ventral horn.

    “This work also led to the surprising discovery of gene expression signatures for plasticity in the dorsal horn and for structural stability in the ventral horn.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The deep dorsal horn excitatory neurons can be divided into two families, with Excit-21 through Excit-25 in one family that is likely derived from dI5 precursors and Excit-26 through Excit-29 in a looser family that includes dI1/2 and V0 precursors.

    “For example, the deep dorsal horn excitatory neurons can be divided into two families, with Excit-21 through Excit-25 in one family that is likely derived from dI5 precursors and Excit-26 through Excit-29 in a looser family that includes dI1/2 and V0 precursors.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Within the ventral horn, structural stability-related genes included components of perineuronal nets such as Tnr (Tenascin-R), as well as adhesion molecules such as Sdk1 and intracellular signaling components such as Ptpn5 (STEP).

    “Within the ventral horn, this included components of perineuronal nets (which are thought to restrict plasticity and had been previously detected in the ventral spinal cord110,111) such as Tnr (Tenascin-R), as well as adhesion molecules such as Sdk1 and intracellular signaling components such as Ptpn5 (STEP) which de-phosphorylates CAMK2α, NMDA receptors, and ERK kinases33.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [110] Sorg, B. A. et al. Casting a wide net: role of perineuronal nets in neural plasticity. J. Neurosci. 36, 11459–11468 (2016). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [111] Galtrey, C. M., Kwok, J. C. F., Carulli, D., Rhodes, K. E. & Fawcett, J. W. Distribution and synthesis of extracellular matrix proteoglycans, hyaluronan, link proteins and tenascin-R in the rat spinal cord. Eur. J. Neurosci. 27, 1373–1390 (2008). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [33] Won, S. & Roche, K. W. Regulation of glutamate receptors by striatal-enriched tyrosine phosphatase 61 (STEP61). J. Physiol. 599, 443–451 (2021). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The harmonized analysis afforded a much deeper characterization of cell type relationships and robustness, the validation of these molecular distinctions in tissue, and through machine learning.

    “Building on these preliminary findings, the scope of the harmonized analysis here afforded a much deeper characterization of cell type relationships and robustness, the validation of these molecular distinctions in tissue, and through machine learning.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Adding regularization lowered the gap between training and validation accuracy.

    “Adding regularization helped to lower the gap between the training and validation accuracy”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Lowering the batch size from 128 to 32 improved validation accuracy by around 5%.

    “Whereas the training was faster, validation accuracy improved by around 5% when we lowered the batch size to 32.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    No additional improvement was seen at a batch size of 16.

    “No additional improvement was seen at a batch size of 16, so the batch size was set to 32 for the rest of the study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    All enriched gene annotation clusters from GO analysis were associated with basic cell metabolism terms such as the ribosome, metabolic pathways, and proton transport.

    “GO analysis revealed that all of the enriched gene annotation clusters were associated with basic cell metabolism terms such as the ribosome, metabolic pathways, and proton transport (Supplementary Table 6).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The support vector machine pipeline achieved an overall accuracy of 80% on the validation data.

    “This pipeline achieved an overall accuracy of 80% on the validation data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    It is not clear whether the cell types from the original studies are comparable in their current forms, resulting in a fragmented set of incomplete and conflicting atlases for the spinal cord.

    “Indeed, it is not clear whether the cell types from the original studies are comparable in their current forms, resulting in a fragmented set of incomplete and conflicting atlases for the spinal cord.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The general feature of lower robustness in mid and ventral clusters is consistent with previous observations and likely reflects similar patterns of gene expression amongst mid and ventral clusters.

    “This general feature was consistent with previous observations and likely reflects similar patterns of gene expression amongst mid and ventral clusters1,4.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [1] Sathyamurthy, A. et al. Massively parallel single nucleus transcriptional profiling defines spinal cord neurons and their activity during behavior. Cell Rep. 22, 2216–2225 (2018). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [4] Rosenberg, A. B. et al. Single-cell profiling of the developing mouse brain and spinal cord with split-pool barcoding. Science 360, 176–182 (2018). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The authors began with raw sequencing reads from each study and performed their own data processing with uniform methods and filters.

    “To best compare the data from these studies, we began with the raw sequencing reads from each study and performed our own data processing with uniform methods and filters.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Integration of publicly available datasets can be used to harmonize spinal cord sequencing data, preserve important biological differences between studies, and uncover a robust set of shared cell types.

    “Together, these analyses demonstrated that integration of publicly available datasets can be used to harmonize spinal cord sequencing data, preserve important biological differences between studies, and uncover a robust set of shared cell types.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The authors discovered general differences in the relationships between clusters in the dorsal versus the ventral horn and molecular trends that could confer differential plasticity control in these two regions.

    “Thus, we discovered general differences in the relationships between clusters in the dorsal versus the ventral horn and molecular trends that could confer differential plasticity control in these two regions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The Npy dorsal inhibitory family comprised Inhib-12 and Inhib-13; studies suggest this family's markers identify neurons involved in mechanical itch and pain.

    “The Npy dorsal, the inhibitory family was comprised of Inhib-12 and Inhib-13. Studies suggest this family’s markers identify neurons involved in mechanical itch and pain73,78,79.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [73] Boyle, K. A. et al. A quantitative study of neurochemically defined populations of inhibitory interneurons in the superficial dorsal horn of the mouse spinal cord. Neuroscience 363, 120–133 (2017). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [78] Bourane, S. et al. Gate control of mechanical itch by a subpopulation of spinal cord interneurons. Science 350, 550–554 (2015). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [79] Tashima, R. et al. A subset of spinal dorsal horn interneurons crucial for gating touch-evoked pain-like behavior. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2021220118 (2021). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The Reln dorsal excitatory family comprised Excit-8, Excit-9, Excit-10, and Excit-11 and expressed markers indicative of a role in chemical itch sensation.

    “The Reln dorsal, excitatory family was comprised of Excit-8, Excit-9, Excit-10, and Excit-11 and expressed markers indicative of a role in chemical itch sensation58–62.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [58] Bell, A. M. et al. Expression of green fluorescent protein defines a specific population of lamina II excitatory interneurons in the GRP::eGFP mouse. Sci. Rep. 10, 13176–14 (2020). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [59] Christensen, A. J. et al. In vivo interrogation of spinal mechanosensory circuits. Cell Rep. 17, 1699–1710 (2016). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [60] Fatima, M. et al. Spinal somatostatin-positive interneurons transmit chemical itch. Pain 160, 1166–1174 (2019). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [61] Huang, J. et al. Circuit dissection of the role of somatostatin in itch and pain. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 707–716 (2018). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [62] Mishra, S. K. & Hoon, M. A. The cells and circuitry for itch responses in mice. Science 340, 968–971 (2013). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The Pdyn dorsal inhibitory family comprised Inhib-9, Inhib-10, and Inhib-11 and expressed markers suggestive of a role in chemical itch.

    “The Pdyn dorsal, inhibitory family was comprised of Inhib-9, Inhib-10, and Inhib-11 and expressed markers suggestive of a role in chemical itch52,61,73–77.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 7 sources checked
    • cites [52] Duan, B. et al. Identification of spinal circuits transmitting and gating mechanical pain. Cell 159, 1417–1432 (2014). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [61] Huang, J. et al. Circuit dissection of the role of somatostatin in itch and pain. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 707–716 (2018). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [73] Boyle, K. A. et al. A quantitative study of neurochemically defined populations of inhibitory interneurons in the superficial dorsal horn of the mouse spinal cord. Neuroscience 363, 120–133 (2017). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [74] Brewer, C. L., Li, J., O’Conor, K., Serafin, E. K. & Baccei, M. L. Neonatal injury evokes persistent deficits in dynorphin inhibitory circuits within the adult mouse superficial dorsal horn. J. Neurosci. 40, 3882–3895 (2020). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [75] Brewer, C. L., Styczynski, L. M., Serafin, E. K. & Baccei, M. L. Postnatal maturation of spinal dynorphin circuits and their role in somatosensation. Pain 161, 1906–1924 (2020). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [76] Kardon, A. P. et al. Dynorphin acts as a neuromodulator to inhibit itch in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. Neuron 82, 573–586 (2014). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [77] Serafin, E. K. et al. Transcriptional profile of spinal dynorphin-lineage interneurons in the developing mouse. Pain 160, 2380–2397 (2019). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The Prkcg dorsal excitatory family comprised Excit-3 and Excit-4 and likely corresponded to neurons involved in light static touch and allodynic pain in pathological situations.

    “The Prkcg dorsal, excitatory family was comprised of Excit-3 and Excit-4 and likely corresponded to neurons involved in light static touch and allodynic pain in pathological situations46,48–56.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 10 sources checked
    • cites [46] Gatto, G. et al. A functional topographic map for spinal sensorimotor reflexes. Neuron 109, 91–104.e5 (2021). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [48] Abraira, V. E. et al. The cellular and synaptic architecture of the mechanosensory dorsal horn. Cell 168, 295–310.e19 (2017). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [49] Acton, D. et al. Spinal neuropeptide Y1 receptor-expressing neurons form an essential excitatory pathway for mechanical itch. Cell Rep. 28, 625–639.e6 (2019). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [50] Bourane, S. et al. Identification of a spinal circuit for light touch and fine motor control. Cell 160, 503–515 (2015). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [51] Cheng, L. et al. Identification of spinal circuits involved in touch-evoked dynamic mechanical pain. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 804–814 (2017). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [52] Duan, B. et al. Identification of spinal circuits transmitting and gating mechanical pain. Cell 159, 1417–1432 (2014). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [53] Gutierrez-Mecinas, M., Furuta, T., Watanabe, M. & Todd, A. J. A quantitative study of neurochemically defined excitatory interneuron populations in laminae I-III of the mouse spinal cord. Mol. Pain. 12, 174480691662906 (2016). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [54] Liu, Y. et al. Touch and tactile neuropathic pain sensitivity are set by corticospinal projections. Nature 561, 547–550 (2018). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [55] Malmberg, A. B., Chen, C., Tonegawa, S. & Basbaum, A. I. Preserved acute pain and reduced neuropathic pain in mice lacking PKCgamma. Science 278, 279–283 (1997). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [56] Peirs, C. et al. Dorsal horn circuits for persistent mechanical pain. Neuron 87, 797–812 (2015). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The Rorb and Adamts5 dorsal inhibitory family comprised Inhib-1, Inhib-2, Inhib-3, Inhib-4, and Inhib-5, with markers of neurons involved in dampening of dynamic touch.

    “The Rorb and Adamts5 dorsal, the inhibitory family was comprised of Inhib-1, Inhib-2, Inhib-3, Inhib-4, and Inhib-5, with markers of neurons involved in the dampening of dynamic touch48,68,69.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [48] Abraira, V. E. et al. The cellular and synaptic architecture of the mechanosensory dorsal horn. Cell 168, 295–310.e19 (2017). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [68] Cui, L. et al. Identification of early RET+ deep dorsal spinal cord interneurons in gating pain. Neuron 91, 1137–1153 (2016). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [69] Gutierrez-Mecinas, M., Polgár, E., Bell, A. M., Herau, M. & Todd, A. J. Substance P-expressing excitatory interneurons in the mouse superficial dorsal horn provide a propriospinal input to the lateral spinal nucleus. Brain Struct. Funct. 223, 2377–2392 (2018). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The Cdh3 dorsal inhibitory family comprised Inhib-6, Inhib-7, and Inhib-8 and are likely involved in dampening of dynamic touch and mechanical allodynia.

    “The Cdh3 dorsal, inhibitory family was comprised of Inhib-6, Inhib-7, and Inhib-8 and are likely to be involved in the dampening of dynamic touch and therefore in mechanical allodynia70–72.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [70] Boyle, K. A. et al. Defining a spinal microcircuit that gates myelinated afferent input: implications for tactile allodynia. Cell Rep. 28, 526–540.e6 (2019). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [71] Hughes, D. I. et al. Morphological, neurochemical and electrophysiological features of parvalbumin-expressing cells: a likely source of axo-axonic inputs in the mouse spinal dorsal horn. J. Physiol. 590, 3927–3951 (2012). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [72] Petitjean, H. et al. Dorsal horn parvalbumin neurons are gate-keepers of touch-evoked pain after nerve injury. Cell Rep. 13, 1246–1257 (2015). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The Maf dorsal excitatory family comprised Excit-5, Excit-6, and Excit-7, which expressed markers of neurons involved in light touch.

    “The Maf dorsal, the excitatory family was comprised of Excit-5, Excit-6, and Excit-7 which expressed markers of neurons involved in light touch46,48,50,56,57.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [46] Gatto, G. et al. A functional topographic map for spinal sensorimotor reflexes. Neuron 109, 91–104.e5 (2021). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [48] Abraira, V. E. et al. The cellular and synaptic architecture of the mechanosensory dorsal horn. Cell 168, 295–310.e19 (2017). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [50] Bourane, S. et al. Identification of a spinal circuit for light touch and fine motor control. Cell 160, 503–515 (2015). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [56] Peirs, C. et al. Dorsal horn circuits for persistent mechanical pain. Neuron 87, 797–812 (2015). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [57] Peirs, C. et al. Mechanical allodynia circuitry in the dorsal horn is defined by the nature of the injury. Neuron 109, 73–90.e7 (2021). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The Sox5 dorsal excitatory family comprised Excit-14, Excit-15, Excit-16, Excit-17, Excit-18, and Excit-19 and expressed markers suggestive of a role in coping pain and mechanical nociception.

    “The Sox5 dorsal, the excitatory family was comprised of Excit-14, Excit-15, Excit-16, Excit-17, Excit-18, and Excit-19, and expressed markers suggestive of a role in coping pain and mechanical nociception46,52,56,63–67.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 8 sources checked
    • cites [46] Gatto, G. et al. A functional topographic map for spinal sensorimotor reflexes. Neuron 109, 91–104.e5 (2021). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [52] Duan, B. et al. Identification of spinal circuits transmitting and gating mechanical pain. Cell 159, 1417–1432 (2014). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [56] Peirs, C. et al. Dorsal horn circuits for persistent mechanical pain. Neuron 87, 797–812 (2015). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [63] Huang, T. et al. Identifying the pathways required for coping behaviours associated with sustained pain. Nature 565, 86–90 (2019). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [64] Moriyama, M. et al. Presynaptic modulation by neuromedin U of sensory synaptic transmission in rat spinal dorsal horn neurones. J. Physiol. 559, 707–713 (2004). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [65] Petitjean, H. et al. Recruitment of spinoparabrachial neurons by dorsal horn calretinin neurons. Cell Rep. 28, 1429–1438.e4 (2019). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [66] Polgár, E. et al. Substance P-expressing neurons in the superficial dorsal horn of the mouse spinal cord: insights into their functions and their roles in synaptic circuits. Neuroscience 450, 113–125 (2020). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [67] Smith, K. M. et al. Calretinin positive neurons form an excitatory amplifier network in the spinal cord dorsal horn. Elife 8, 1750 (2019). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    All ME/Lmx1b clusters except Excit-25 expressed Tacr1, and Excit-21 also expressed Lypd1, suggesting these are candidate ascending populations.

    “All of the clusters except Excit-25 expressed Tacr1 and Excit-21 also expressed Lypd1, suggesting that these are candidate ascending populations3.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] Häring, M. et al. Neuronal atlas of the dorsal horn defines its architecture and links sensory input to transcriptional cell types. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 869–880 (2018). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The joint analysis of spinal cord neurons from embryonic through adult stages began to align these two perspectives on cell types while highlighting complex relationships between genetically defined cellular origins and mature transcriptional signatures.

    “Together, the joint analysis of spinal cord neurons from embryonic through adult stages began to align these two perspectives on cell types while also highlighting the complex relationships that exist between genetically defined cellular origins and mature transcriptional signatures.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Developmental lineage is a powerful and influential framework for categorizing spinal neurons.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Excit-33 was comprised almost entirely of nuclei from the Rosenberg dataset and may represent an immature cell type.

    “Excit-33 was comprised almost entirely of nuclei from the Rosenberg dataset and may represent an immature cell type.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Excit-35, Excit-36, and Excit-37 are likely derived from the V2a lineage, as they expressed Vsx2 (Chx10) and included many cells from the Hayashi dataset sorted based on Chx10 expression, and thus may play a role in skilled reaching.

    “Excit-35, Excit-36, and Excit-37 are likely derived from the V2a lineage, as they expressed Vsx2 (Chx10) and included many cells from the Hayashi dataset that sorted cells based on Chx10 genetic expression and thus may play a role in skilled reaching87.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [87] Azim, E., Jiang, J., Alstermark, B. & Jessell, T. M. Skilled reaching relies on a V2a propriospinal internal copy circuit. Nature 508, 357–363 (2014). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Several cluster markers of ventral cell types, such as Sim1, were not observed in adult spinal cord tissue by in situ hybridization; while detected in harmonized sequencing data, they likely represent lingering RNA from developmental samples.

    “Of note, several cluster markers of ventral cell types, such as Sim1, were not observed in adult spinal cord tissue by in situ hybridization and while they are detected in the harmonized sequencing data, they likely represent lingering RNA from developmental samples.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    These ME/Lmx1b clusters expressed Lmx1b, suggesting a dI5/dILB embryonic origin.

    “These clusters expressed Lmx1b, suggesting a dI5/dILB embryonic origin.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Excit-28 and Excit-29 also expressed Onecut2 and Pou6f2, potentially revealing a link with ventral cell types.

    “Excit-28 and Excit-29 also express Onecut2 and Pou6f2, potentially revealing a link with ventral cell types.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Ventral clusters had less distinct gene expression patterns and were less robust than dorsal and mid clusters, so their final identities should be considered with caution.

    “In general, we found that the ventral clusters had less distinct gene expression patterns and were less robust than dorsal and mid clusters; therefore, the final identities of these clusters should be considered with caution.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The remaining ME family comprised Excit-26, Excit-27, Excit-28, and Excit-29; these clusters do not express Lmx1b and are likely derived from dI1-3 or ventral embryonic lineages.

    “The remaining ME family was comprised of mid, excitatory clusters were comprised of Excit-26, Excit-27, Excit-28, and Excit-29. These clusters do not express Lmx1b, in contrast to the other mid excitatory family and are likely derived from dI1-3 or ventral embryonic lineages.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The mid inhibitory cell types were grouped as one family comprising Inhib-15, Inhib-16, Inhib-17, Inhib-18, Inhib-19, Inhib-20, and Inhib-21, which expressed Slc6a5 (except Inhib-21) and Gad2, implicating these neurons in sensorimotor processing.

    “The mid inhibitory cell types were grouped as one family comprised of Inhib-15, Inhib-16, Inhib-17, Inhib-18, Inhib-19, Inhib-20, and Inhib-21, which expressed the glycinergic marker Slc6a5 (with the exception of Inhib-21) and also the gaba-ergic marker Gad2, implicating these neurons in sensorimotor processing84–86.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [84] Hilde, K. L. et al. Satb2 is required for the development of a spinal exteroceptive microcircuit that modulates limb position. Neuron 91, 763–776 (2016). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [85] Koch, S. C. et al. RORβ spinal interneurons gate sensory transmission during locomotion to secure a fluid walking gait. Neuron https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2017.11.011 (2017). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [86] Fink, A. J. P. et al. Presynaptic inhibition of spinal sensory feedback ensures smooth movement. Nature 509, 43–48 (2014). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    In situ hybridization experiments were performed on mid/lower lumbar spinal cord sections, so markers for Excit-30 were not validated.

    “As the in situ hybridization experiments were performed on mid/lower lumbar spinal cord sections, we did not validate markers for this cluster.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Inhib-22 and Inhib-27 also expressed Gad2, Pax2, and Pou6f2; they were distinguished by low levels of Gata3 in Inhib-27, which may represent V2b lineage.

    “Inhib-22 and Inhib-27 also expressed the gaba-ergic marker Gad2 as well as Pax2 and Pou6f2. They were distinguished by low levels of Gata3 expression in Inhib-27, which may represent V2b lineage.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Inhib-23 was identified by expression of Gm26673 and Pvalb, which may suggest that this cluster included Ia-inhibitory neurons.

    “They were identified by expression of Gm26673 and Pvalb in Inhib-23, which may suggest that this cluster included Ia-inhibitory neurons89.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [89] Alvarez, F. J. et al. Postnatal phenotype and localization of spinal cord V1 derived interneurons. J. Comp. Neurol. 493, 177–192 (2005). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    These results must be interpreted with caution because each of these datasets were included in the overall training data, which could lead to artificially high performance.

    “These results must be interpreted with caution because each of these datasets were included in the overall training data which could lead to artificially high performance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: There is no existing gold standard for spinal cord cell identities.
    • Rests on an assumption: The harmonized analysis cell type labels are adequate as training labels for machine learning classifiers.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The mid excitatory (ME)/Lmx1b family comprised Excit-21, Excit-22, Excit-23, Excit-24, and Excit-25 and corresponds to cells suggested to be involved in pain.

    “The mid excitatory (ME)/Lmx1b family was comprised of Excit-21, Excit-22, Excit-23, Excit-24, and Excit-25 and corresponds to cells suggested to be involved in pain3,83.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [3] Häring, M. et al. Neuronal atlas of the dorsal horn defines its architecture and links sensory input to transcriptional cell types. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 869–880 (2018). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [83] Barik, A. et al. A spinoparabrachial circuit defined by Tacr1 expression drives pain. Elife 10, e61135 (2021). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Excit-31, Excit-32, Excit-33, and Excit-34 expressed low levels of Lhx2, Lhx9, and Isl1, potentially suggesting dorsal dI1/dI2/dI3 embryonic lineages.

    “Of these, Excit-31, Excit-32, Excit-33, and Excit-34 expressed low levels of Lhx2, Lhx9, and Isl1, potentially suggesting dorsal dI1/dI2/dI3 embryonic lineages for these clusters.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Many cells from the Baek dataset, which sorted cells based on spinocerebellar status, were found in Excit-35, suggesting this population includes ascending projection neurons that target the cerebellum.

    “Intriguingly, many cells from the Baek dataset, which sorted cells based on spinocerebellar status were found in Excit-35, suggesting that this population includes ascending projection neurons that target the cerebellum.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Inhib-26 was the most robust ventral cluster and expressed the Renshaw marker genes Chrna2, Chrna7, and Calb1, suggesting it corresponded to Renshaw cells.

    “Inhib-26 was the most robust ventral cluster and expressed the Renshaw marker genes Chrna2, Chrna7, and Calb1, suggesting that this cluster corresponded to Renshaw cells89,90.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [89] Alvarez, F. J. et al. Postnatal phenotype and localization of spinal cord V1 derived interneurons. J. Comp. Neurol. 493, 177–192 (2005). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [90] Perry, S. et al. Firing properties of Renshaw cells defined by Chrna2 are modulated by hyperpolarizing and small conductance ion currents Ih and ISK. Eur. J. Neurosci. 41, 889–900 (2015). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Excit-30 contained only two defined spinocerebellar cells from the Baek et al. dataset while the majority was from the Hayashi dataset, arguing against Clarke's column identity and suggesting a V2 embryonic lineage.

    “However, this cluster only contained two defined spinocerebellar cells from the Baek et al. dataset while the majority of this cluster was from the Hayashi dataset, arguing against Clarke’s column identity and also suggesting a V2 embryonic lineage.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The Excit-30 cluster was marked by Gbx2, Neurod2, and Sp8, and there was partial evidence that it corresponded to Clarke's column (CC).

    “The Excit-30 cluster was marked by Gbx2, Neurod2, and Sp8 and there was partial evidence that it corresponded to Clarke’s column (CC).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationown data

    The difference between in situ hybridization and harmonized sequencing data may reflect differences in developmental patterns.

    “In a few instances, this data differed from the harmonized sequencing data (for example in Excit-3 and Excit-4) which may reflect differences in developmental patterns.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Animal experiments were performed in accordance with institutional guidelines and approved (protocol #1384) by the National Institute of Neurological Disorder and Stroke's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

    “Animal experiments were performed in accordance with institutional guidelines and approved (protocol #1384) by the National Institute of Neurological Disorder and Stroke’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    An even balance of male and female mice that were 9 weeks old and of mixed C57BL/6 J and BALB/cJ background were used for single nucleus sequencing (four mice) and validation studies (two groups of three mice).

    “An even balance of male and female mice that were 9 weeks old and of mixed C57BL/6 J and BALB/cJ background were used for single nucleus sequencing (four mice) and validation studies (two groups of three mice).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The adult cell types of Ia inhibitory neurons and CSF-contacting neurons each have dual origins.

    “It is already known that the adult cell types of Ia inhibitory neurons and CSF-contacting neurons each have dual origins43,45,121, suggesting that this could be a common occurrence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [43] Petracca, Y. L. et al. The late and dual origin of cerebrospinal fluid-contacting neurons in the mouse spinal cord. Development 143, 880–891 (2016).

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [45] Djenoune, L. et al. The dual developmental origin of spinal cerebrospinal fluid-contacting neurons gives rise to distinct functional subtypes. Sci. Rep. 7, 719–14 (2017). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [121] Zhang, Y. et al. An RNA-sequencing transcriptome and splicing database of glia, neurons, and vascular cells of the cerebral cortex. J. Neurosci. 34, 11929–11947 (2014). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    For all three phases, the authors used a dendrogram based on mean gene expression and UMAP location to identify closely related clusters and then probed for differential gene expression to determine whether candidate pairs of clusters should be merged.

    “For all three phases, we used the following method to determine whether candidate pairs of clusters should be merged: a dendrogram based on mean gene expression and UMAP location were used to systemically identify closely related clusters and we then probed for differential gene expression (for example, see Supplementary Fig. 4).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    The range of resolutions was examined by the range of average silhouette scores for the clusters, visual inspection of UMAP cluster distribution, and comparison of cluster markers with known markers and with known co-expression patterns in the literature.

    “Here, the range of resolutions were examined by (1) the range of average silhouette scores for the clusters, (2) visual inspection of UMAP cluster distribution, and, most importantly (3) comparison of cluster markers with known markers and with known co-expression patterns in the literature. (Supplementary Fig. 4).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    This analysis is limited in scope to RNA expression in the postnatal mouse spinal cord and reflects a merged study of multiple time points.

    “Most specifically, this analysis is limited in scope to RNA expression in the postnatal mouse spinal cord and reflects a merged study of multiple time points.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Annotations from Seurat integration were overlapped on the integrated UMAP projections obtained from other integration methods and the cell type clusters were compared for reproducibility.

    “Annotations from Seurat integration were then overlapped on the integrated UMAP projections obtained from other integration methods and the cell type clusters were compared for reproducibility.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Ventral neuron cell types may be organized at a second, nested level of spatial trends that overlay embryonic lineage-defined cell types: a Pou6f2-Esrrg trend along the dorsal-ventral axis and a Nfib-Zfhx3/4 and birthdate trends along the medial-lateral axis.

    “Ventral neuron cell types may be organized at a second, nested level of spatial trends that overlay embryonic lineage-defined cell types: a Pou6f2-Esrrg trend along the dorsal-ventral axis and a Nfib-Zfhx3/4 and birthdate trends along the medial-lateral axis, consistent with a recent report108.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [108] Osseward, P. J. et al. Conserved genetic signatures parcellate cardinal spinal neuron classes into local and projection subsets. Science 372, 385–393 (2021). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    This reflects some technical limitations but also a fundamental complexity and diversity in how gene expression is controlled within individual cells and in cell-type populations.

    “We propose that this reflects some technical limitations but also a fundamental complexity and diversity in how gene expression is controlled within individual cells and in cell-type populations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Cell type annotations for the non-neuronal cell types were based on the presence of well-established marker genes and on the gene expression patterns in the Allen in situ hybridization database.

    “Cell type annotations for the non-neuronal cell types were based on the presence of well-established marker genes (Supplementary Table 1) and on the gene expression patterns in the Allen in situ hybridization database (for meningeal, ependymal, Schwann cell, and peripheral glia clusters).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The main integration was compared to three independent methods: Harmony, Conos, and LIGER.

    “This integration was compared to three independent methods (Harmony25, Conos26, and LIGER27).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [25] Korsunsky, I. et al. Fast, sensitive and accurate integration of single-cell data with Harmony. Nat. Meth 16, 1289–1296 (2019). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [26] Barkas, N. et al. Joint analysis of heterogeneous single-cell RNA-seq dataset collections. Nat. Meth 16, 695–698 (2019). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [27] Welch, J. D. et al. Single-cell multi-omic integration compares and contrasts features of brain cell identity. Cell 177, 1873–1887.e17 (2019). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A comparative analysis of automated classification approaches across diverse datasets found that SVM and neural network models showed the best performance on the Allen Brain Atlas dataset of 92 neuronal cell types.

    “A comparative analysis of automated classification approaches across diverse datasets found that SVM and neural network models showed the best performance on the Allen Brain Atlas dataset of 92 neuronal cell types–a dataset similar in scale and complexity to the harmonized analysis here125.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [125] Abdelaal, T. et al. A comparison of automatic cell identification methods for single-cell RNA sequencing data. Genome Biol. 20, 194–19 (2019). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The misclassification may reflect a training dataset not large enough to distinguish closely related cell types, small clusters not modeled as well, and some mid/ventral clusters defined partly by early postnatal gene expression absent from the independent adult dataset.

    “This may reflect a training dataset that is not large enough to train a model that distinguishes closely related cell types, that small clusters are not modeled as well, and that some mid/ventral clusters are defined partly by early postnatal gene expression contained within the harmonized analysis but absent from the independent adult dataset.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: There is no existing gold standard for spinal cord cell identities.
    • Rests on an assumption: The harmonized analysis cell type labels are adequate as training labels for machine learning classifiers.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Raw datasets were used instead of investigator-provided count matrices so that all sequences could be aligned to the same genome and uniform data filtering applied.

    “Raw datasets were used instead of investigator-provided count matrices so that we could align all sequences to the same genome and apply uniform data filtering.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The authors previously noted differences in the robustness of dorsal and ventral cell type clusters.

    “We had previously noted differences in the robustness of dorsal and ventral cell type clusters1 and a similar trend of overlapping ventral cell types was observed in the neonatal spinal cord4.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] Sathyamurthy, A. et al. Massively parallel single nucleus transcriptional profiling defines spinal cord neurons and their activity during behavior. Cell Rep. 22, 2216–2225 (2018). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    For all three phases, each cluster was analyzed for candidate marker genes and excluded if it met low-quality or doublet criteria.

    “For all three phases, each cluster was analyzed for candidate marker genes and excluded if the cluster met either of the following criteria. Clusters were considered low-quality if they had fewer than three significant markers relevant to cell type, particularly if they showed very low nGene. Clusters were considered doublets if they had significant markers for multiple unrelated cell types and a”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Single-cell/nucleus profiling, particularly single-cell/nucleus RNA sequencing, produces one perspective on cell types and it is not yet clear how this will relate to other core cellular features such as circuit connectivity, electrophysiology, and behavioral function.

    “Finally, it is crucial to note that single-cell/nucleus profiling, particularly single-cell/nucleus RNA sequencing, produces one perspective on cell types and it is not yet clear how this will relate to other core cellular features such as circuit connectivity, electrophysiology, and behavioral function.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A similar trend of overlapping ventral cell types was observed in the neonatal spinal cord.

    “We had previously noted differences in the robustness of dorsal and ventral cell type clusters1 and a similar trend of overlapping ventral cell types was observed in the neonatal spinal cord4.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] Rosenberg, A. B. et al. Single-cell profiling of the developing mouse brain and spinal cord with split-pool barcoding. Science 360, 176–182 (2018). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationown data

    The overtrained model will perform better on unseen data.

    “suggesting that the overtrained model will perform better on unseen data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    For both coarse cell types and clean neurons, 10% of cells were withheld as the query dataset, whilst the remaining were used as the reference dataset.

    “For both coarse cell types and clean neurons, 10% of cells were withheld as the query dataset, whilst the remaining were used as the reference dataset.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
130 of 130
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is no existing gold standard for spinal cord cell identities.

    “because there is no existing gold standard for spinal cord cell identities”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The harmonized analysis cell type labels are adequate as training labels for machine learning classifiers.

    “each of these models were trained using cell type labels from the harmonized analysis”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Perfect performance would require perfect and invariable biological data: discrete cell types that express completely distinct patterns of gene expression and experimental data without natural heterogeneity, doublets, low-quality cells, or other sources of indeterminate data.

    “Perfect performance would require perfect and invariable biological data: discrete cell types that express completely distinct patterns of gene expression and experimental data without natural heterogeneity, doublets, low-quality cells, or other sources of indeterminate data.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Developmental lineage is a powerful and influential framework for categorizing spinal neurons.

    “Developmental lineage has been a powerful and influential framework for categorizing spinal neurons, particularly within the ventral horn, and relies on the combinatorial expression code of transcription factors that specify distinct progenitor domains along the dorsal-ventral axis of the spinal cord.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is no commonly accepted standard set of spinal cord cell types.

    “In the absence of a commonly accepted standard set of spinal cord cell types, it is impossible to answer this question completely.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The rate of false-negative data in each cell and the requirement for statistical power necessitates analyzing many cells of each type and considering population-level shared patterns.

    “Data is captured from thousands of individual cells, but the rate of false-negative data in each cell and the requirement for statistical power necessitates analyzing many cells of each type and considering population-level shared patterns.”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The taxonomy recapitulated the known hierarchical organization of neuronal subpopulations in the spinal cord.

    “Our taxonomy recapitulated the known hierarchical organization of neuronal subpopulations in the spinal cord9,12,31–33 (Extended Data Fig. 4a–g).”

    From The neurons that restore walking after paralysis (2022) · cites this paper as [33]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Four cluster-definition metrics claimed, but only three listed

    Minor

    The paper says it considered four metrics for benchmarking classification, but the ensuing numbered list gives only three.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Blum, J. A. et al. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of the adult mouse spinal cord reveals molecular diversity of autonomic and skeletal motor neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 24, 572–583 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Dubreuil, A., Valente, A., Beiran, M., Mastrogiuseppe, F. & Ostojic, S. Complementary roles of dimensionality and population structure in neural computations. bioRxiv https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.07.03.185942v1.full?%3Fcollection= (2020). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Russ, D. E., Cross, R. B. P., Li, L., Koch, S. C., Matson, K. J. E., Yadav, A., Alkaslasi, M. R., Lee, D. I., Le Pichon, C. E., Menon, V., & Levine, A. J.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University College London (GB)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Levine, Ariel J.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2021-09-29
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
5722-5722
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3203053031
Cited by
255
References
131
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 1
FWCI
12.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (1ZIA NS003153)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Keywords
mouse spinal cord, cell type atlas, single-cell transcriptomics, cell type classification, neurotransmitter identity, gene expression signatures
MeSH terms
RNA-Seq, Animals, Atlases as Topic, Cell Nucleus, Neurons, Spinal Cord, Mice, Single-Cell Analysis, Transcriptome, Spatial Analysis, Datasets as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-08.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-08.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review