The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PIP2 hydrolysis underlies agonist‐induced inhibition and regulates voltage gating of two‐pore domain K+ channels
Abstract
Two‐pore (2‐P) domain potassium channels are implicated in the control of the resting membrane potential, hormonal secretion, and the amplitude, frequency and duration of the action potential. These channels are strongly regulated by hormones and neurotransmitters. Little is known, however, about the mechanism underlying their regulation. Here we show that phosphatidylinositol 4,5‐bisphosphate (PIP 2) gating underlies several aspects of 2‐P channel regulation. Our results demonstrate that all four 2‐P channels tested, TASK1, TASK3, TREK1 and TRAAK are activated by PIP 2. We show that mechanical stimulation may promote PIP 2 activation of TRAAK channels. For TREK1, TASK1 and TASK3 channels, PIP 2 hydrolysis underlies inhibition by several agonists. The kinetics of inhibition by the PIP 2 scavenger polylysine, and the inhibition by the phosphatidylinositol 4‐kinase inhibitor wortmannin correlated with the level of agonist‐induced inhibition. This finding suggests that the strength of channel PIP 2 interactions determines the extent of PLC‐induced inhibition. Finally, we show that PIP 2 hydrolysis modulates voltage dependence of TREK1 channels and the unrelated voltage‐dependent KCNQ1 channels. Our results suggest that PIP 2 is a common gating molecule for K+ channel families despite their distinct structures and physiological properties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Membrane Phospholipid Control of Nucleotide Sensitivity of K ATP Channels
Shyng, S.-L., & Nichols, C. G. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.282.5391.1138 · Cited by 559
Zhang, H., Craciun, L. C., Mirshahi, T., Rohács, T., Lopes, C. M. B., Jin, T., & Logothetis, D. E. (2003) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00125-9 · Cited by 523
Self-citation
Cited by
Phosphoinositides: Tiny Lipids With Giant Impact on Cell Regulation
Balla, T. (2013) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00028.2012 · Cited by 1,638
Self-citationPhysiology of cell volume regulation in vertebrates
Hoffmann, E. K., Lambert, I. H., & Pedersen, S. F. (2009) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00037.2007 · Cited by 1,441
Molecular Background of Leak K+Currents: Two-Pore Domain Potassium Channels
Enyedi, P., & Czirják, G. (2010) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00029.2009 · Cited by 868
Self-citationPIP 2 Is a Necessary Cofactor for Ion Channel Function: How and Why?
Suh, B.-C., & Hille, B. (2008) · Annual Review of Biophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.032807.125859 · Cited by 646
Butt, A. M., & Kalsi, A. (2006) · Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1582-4934.2006.tb00289.x · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Lopes, C. M. B., Rohács, T., Czirják, G., Balla, T., Enyedi, P., & Logothetis, D. E.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-03-22
- Volume
- 564
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 117-129
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W1613705179
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.