The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sex differences in transgenerational alterations of growth and metabolism in progeny (F2) of female offspring (F1) of rats fed a low protein diet during pregnancy and lactation
Abstract
Compelling epidemiological and experimental evidence indicates that a suboptimal environment during fetal and neonatal development in both humans and animals may programme offspring susceptibility to later development of several chronic diseases including obesity and diabetes in which altered carbohydrate metabolism plays a central role. One of the most interesting and significant features of developmental programming is the evidence from several studies that the adverse consequences of altered intrauterine environments can be passed transgenerationally from mother (F 0) to daughter (F 1) to second generation offspring (F 2). We determined whether when F 0 female rats are exposed to protein restriction during pregnancy and/or lactation their F 1 female pups deliver F 2 offspring with in vivo evidence of altered glucose and insulin metabolism. We fed F 0 virgin Wistar rats a normal control 20% casein diet (C) or a protein restricted isocaloric diet (R) containing 10% casein during pregnancy. F 1 female R pups weighed less than C at birth. After delivery, mothers received C or R diet during lactation to provide four F 1 offspring groups CC (first letter pregnancy diet and second lactation diet), RR, CR and RC. All F 1 female offspring were fed ad libitum with C diet after weaning and during their first pregnancy and lactation. As they grew female offspring (F 1) of RR and CR mothers exhibited low body weight and food intake with increased sensitivity to insulin during a glucose tolerance test at 110 days of postnatal life. Male F 2 CR offspring showed evidence of insulin resistance. In contrast RC F 2 females showed evidence of insulin resistance. Sex differences were also observed in F 2 offspring in resting glucose and insulin and insulin: glucose ratios. These sex differences also showed differences specific to stage of development time window. We conclude that maternal protein restriction adversely affects glucose and insulin metabolism of male and female F 2 offspring in a manner specific to sex and developmental time window during their mother's (the F 1) fetal and neonatal development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Glucose tolerance in adults after prenatal exposure to famine
Ravelli, A., van der Meulen, J., Michels, R., Osmond, C., Barker, D., Hales, C., & Bleker, O. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)07244-9 · Cited by 1,606
Intrauterine Growth Retardation Leads to the Development of Type 2 Diabetes in the Rat
Simmons, R. A., Templeton, L. J., & Gertz, S. J. (2001) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/diabetes.50.10.2279 · Cited by 638 · cited 4×
“…(2) global nutrient restriction (Garofano et al. 1997, 1998a); (3) experimentally induced maternal diabetes (Holemans et al. 1997; Holemans et al. 2003); (4) restriction of uterine blood flow (Simmons et al. 2001); and (5) over-exposure of the fetus to glucocorticoids (Nyirenda et al. 2001).”
BackgroundInfluentialIn utero undernutrition impairs rat beta-cell development
Garofano, A., Czernichow, P., & Bréant, B. (1997) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s001250050812 · Cited by 320
Cited by
Environmental epigenomics and disease susceptibility
Jirtle, R. L., & Skinner, M. K. (2007) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2045 · Cited by 2,492
Early Developmental Conditioning of Later Health and Disease: Physiology or Pathophysiology?
Hanson, M. A., & Gluckman, P. D. (2014) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00029.2013 · Cited by 1,188
Gluckman, P. D., Hanson, M. A., & Beedle, A. S. (2007) · American Journal of Human Biology · doi:10.1002/ajhb.20590 · Cited by 1,006
Painter, R., Osmond, C., Gluckman, P., Hanson, M., Phillips, D., & Roseboom, T. (2008) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01822.x · Cited by 733
Transgenerational Epigenetic Effects
Youngson, N. A., & Whitelaw, E. (2008) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164445 · Cited by 580
Metadata
- Authors
- Zambrano, E., Martínez‐Samayoa, P. M., Bautista, C. J., Deás, M., Guillén, L., Rodríguez‐González, G. L., Guzmán, C., Larrea, F., & Nathanielsz, P. W.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 566
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 225-236
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W1496227568
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sex differences in transgenerational alterations of growth and metabolism in progeny (F2) of female offspring (F1) of rats fed a low protein diet during pregnancy and lactation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.2005.086462
- The paper
- Zambrano, E., Martínez‐Samayoa, P. M., Bautista, C. J., Deás, M., Guillén, L., Rodríguez‐González, G. L., Guzmán, C., Larrea, F., & Nathanielsz, P. W. (2005). Sex differences in transgenerational alterations of growth and metabolism in progeny (F2) of female offspring (F1) of rats fed a low protein diet during pregnancy and lactation. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2005.086462
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.