The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Extrasynaptic αβ subunit GABAA receptors on rat hippocampal pyramidal neurons
Open accessAbstract
Extrasynaptic GABA A receptors that are tonically activated by ambient GABA are important for controlling neuronal excitability. In hippocampal pyramidal neurons, the subunit composition of these extrasynaptic receptors may include α5βγ and/or α4βδ subunits. Our present studies reveal that a component of the tonic current in the hippocampus is highly sensitive to inhibition by Zn 2+. This component is probably not mediated by either α5βγ or α4βδ receptors, but might be explained by the presence of αβ isoforms. Using patch‐clamp recording from pyramidal neurons, a small tonic current measured in the absence of exogenous GABA exhibited both high and low sensitivity to Zn 2+ inhibition (IC 50 values, 1.89 and 223 μ m, respectively). Using low nanomolar and micromolar GABA concentrations to replicate tonic currents, we identified two components that are mediated by benzodiazepine‐sensitive and ‐insensitive receptors. The latter indicated that extrasynaptic GABA A receptors exist that are devoid of γ2 subunits. To distinguish whether the benzodiazepine‐insensitive receptors were αβ or αβδ isoforms, we used single‐channel recording. Expressing recombinant α1β3γ2, α5β3γ2, α4β3δ and α1β3 receptors in human embryonic kidney (HEK) or mouse fibroblast (Ltk) cells, revealed similar openings with high main conductances (∼25–28 pS) for γ2 or δ subunit‐containing receptors whereas αβ receptors were characterized by a lower main conductance state (∼11 pS). Recording from pyramidal cell somata revealed a similar range of channel conductances, indicative of a mixture of GABA A receptors in the extrasynaptic membrane. The lowest conductance state (∼11 pS) was the most sensitive to Zn 2+ inhibition in accord with the presence of αβ receptors. This receptor type is estimated to account for up to 10% of all extrasynaptic GABA A receptors on hippocampal pyramidal neurons.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Variations on an inhibitory theme: phasic and tonic activation of GABAA receptors
Farrant, M., & Nusser, Z. (2005) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1625 · Cited by 2,081
Cited by
Olsen, R. W., & Sieghart, W. (2008) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.108.00505 · Cited by 1,064
Rupprecht, R., Papadopoulos, V., Rammes, G., Baghai, T. C., Fan, J., Akula, N., Groyer, G., Adams, D., & Schumacher, M. (2010) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3295 · Cited by 930
Extrasynaptic GABAA Receptors: Their Function in the CNS and Implications for Disease
Brickley, S. G., & Mody, I. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.12.012 · Cited by 676
GABAA Receptor Trafficking-Mediated Plasticity of Inhibitory Synapses
Luscher, B., Fuchs, T., & Kilpatrick, C. L. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.03.024 · Cited by 434
Which GABA A Receptor Subunits Are Necessary for Tonic Inhibition in the Hippocampus?
Glykys, J., Mann, E. O., & Mody, I. (2008) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4751-07.2008 · Cited by 370
Metadata
- Authors
- Mortensen, M., & Smart, T. G.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-12-07
- Volume
- 577
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 841-856
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W1520068218
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.