The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sensitivity of coherent oscillations in rat hippocampus to AC electric fields
Open accessAbstract
The sensitivity of brain tissue to weak extracellular electric fields is important in assessing potential public health risks of extremely low frequency (ELF) fields, and potential roles of endogenous fields in brain function. Here we determine the effect of applied electric fields on membrane potentials and coherent network oscillations. Applied DC electric fields change transmembrane potentials in CA3 pyramidal cell somata by 0.18 mV per V m−1 applied. AC sinusoidal electric fields have smaller effects on transmembrane potentials: sensitivity drops as an exponential decay function of frequency. At 50 and 60 Hz it is ∼0.4 that for DC fields. Effects of fields of ≤ 16 V m−1 peak‐to‐peak (p‐p) did not outlast application. Kainic acid (100 n m) induced coherent network oscillations in the beta and gamma bands (15–100 Hz). Applied fields of ≥ 6 V m−1 p‐p (2.1 V m−1 r.m.s.) shifted the gamma peak in the power spectrum to centre on the applied field frequency or a subharmonic. Statistically significant effects on the timing of pyramidal cell firing within the oscillation appeared at distinct thresholds: at 50 Hz, 1 V m−1 p‐p (354 mV m−1 r.m.s.) had statistically significant effects in 71% of slices, and 0.5 V m−1 p‐p (177 mV m−1 r.m.s.) in 20%. These threshold fields are consistent with current environmental guidelines. They correspond to changes in somatic potential of ∼70 μV, below membrane potential noise levels for neurons, demonstrating the emergent properties of neuronal networks can be more sensitive than measurable effects in single neurons.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cholinergic induction of network oscillations at 40 Hz in the hippocampus in vitro
Fisahn, A., Pike, F. G., Buhl, E. H., & Paulsen, O. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/28179 · Cited by 884
Fujisawa, S., Matsuki, N., & Ikegaya, Y. (2004) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2004.066639 · Cited by 36
Cited by
The origin of extracellular fields and currents — EEG, ECoG, LFP and spikes
Buzsáki, G., Anastassiou, C. A., & Koch, C. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3241 · Cited by 4,225
Brunoni, A. R., Nitsche, M. A., Bolognini, N., Bikson, M., Wagner, T., Merabet, L., Edwards, D. J., Valero-Cabre, A., Rotenberg, A., Pascual-Leone, A., et al. (2012) · Brain stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2011.03.002 · Cited by 1,445
A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools
Woods, A. J., Antal, A., Bikson, M., Boggio, P. S., Brunoni, A. R., Celnik, P., Cohen, L. G., Fregni, F., Herrmann, C. S., Kappenman, E. S., et al. (2016) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2015.11.012 · Cited by 1,439
Antal, A., Alekseichuk, I., Bikson, M., Brockmöller, J., Brunoni, A. R., Chen, R., Cohen, L. G., Dowthwaite, G., Ellrich, J., Flöel, A., et al. (2017) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2017.06.001 · Cited by 1,301
Saturated Reconstruction of a Volume of Neocortex
Kasthuri, N., Hayworth, K. J., Berger, D. R., Schalek, R. L., Conchello, J. A., Knowles-Barley, S., Lee, D., Vázquez-Reina, A., Kaynig, V., Jones, T. R., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.054 · Cited by 1,044
Metadata
- Authors
- Deans, J. K., Powell, A. D., & Jefferys, J. G. R.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-08-30
- Volume
- 583
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 555-565
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W1565022768
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sensitivity of coherent oscillations in rat hippocampus to AC electric fields. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.2007.137711
- The paper
- Deans, J. K., Powell, A. D., & Jefferys, J. G. R. (2007). Sensitivity of coherent oscillations in rat hippocampus to AC electric fields. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2007.137711
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.