Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 292

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sensitivity of coherent oscillations in rat hippocampus to AC electric fields

Open access
Deans, Jacqueline K., Powell, Andrew D., Jefferys, John G. R.·2007·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

The sensitivity of brain tissue to weak extracellular electric fields is important in assessing potential public health risks of extremely low frequency (ELF) fields, and potential roles of endogenous fields in brain function. Here we determine the effect of applied electric fields on membrane potentials and coherent network oscillations. Applied DC electric fields change transmembrane potentials in CA3 pyramidal cell somata by 0.18 mV per V m−1 applied. AC sinusoidal electric fields have smaller effects on transmembrane potentials: sensitivity drops as an exponential decay function of frequency. At 50 and 60 Hz it is ∼0.4 that for DC fields. Effects of fields of ≤ 16 V m−1 peak‐to‐peak (p‐p) did not outlast application. Kainic acid (100 n m) induced coherent network oscillations in the beta and gamma bands (15–100 Hz). Applied fields of ≥ 6 V m−1 p‐p (2.1 V m−1 r.m.s.) shifted the gamma peak in the power spectrum to centre on the applied field frequency or a subharmonic. Statistically significant effects on the timing of pyramidal cell firing within the oscillation appeared at distinct thresholds: at 50 Hz, 1 V m−1 p‐p (354 mV m−1 r.m.s.) had statistically significant effects in 71% of slices, and 0.5 V m−1 p‐p (177 mV m−1 r.m.s.) in 20%. These threshold fields are consistent with current environmental guidelines. They correspond to changes in somatic potential of ∼70 μV, below membrane potential noise levels for neurons, demonstrating the emergent properties of neuronal networks can be more sensitive than measurable effects in single neurons.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.137711

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 292

Metadata

Authors
Deans, J. K., Powell, A. D., & Jefferys, J. G. R.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-08-30
Volume
583
Issue
2
Pages
555-565
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W1565022768
Cited by
292
References
2
FWCI
4.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sensitivity of coherent oscillations in rat hippocampus to AC electric fields. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.2007.137711
The paper
Deans, J. K., Powell, A. D., & Jefferys, J. G. R. (2007). Sensitivity of coherent oscillations in rat hippocampus to AC electric fields. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2007.137711

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.