Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 211

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Amplified respiratory–sympathetic coupling in the spontaneously hypertensive rat: does it contribute to hypertension?

Open access
Simms, Annabel E., Paton, Julian F. R., Pickering, Anthony E., Allen, Andrew M.·2009·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

Sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) is elevated in established hypertension. We tested the hypothesis that SNA is elevated in neonate and juvenile spontaneously hypertensive (SH) rats prior to the development of hypertension, and that this may be due to augmented respiratory–sympathetic coupling. Using the working heart–brainstem preparation, perfusion pressure, phrenic nerve activity and thoracic (T8) SNA were recorded in male SH rats and normotensive Wistar–Kyoto (WKY) rats at three ages: neonates (postnatal day 9–16), 3 weeks old and 5 weeks old. Perfusion pressure was higher in SH rats at all ages reflecting higher vascular resistance. The amplitude of respiratory‐related bursts of SNA was greater in SH rats at all ages (P< 0.05). This was reflected in larger Traube–Hering pressure waves in SH rats (1.4 ± 0.8 versus 9.8 ± 1.5 mmHg WKY versus SH rat, 5 weeks old,n= 5 per group,P< 0.01). Recovery from hypocapnic‐induced apnoea and reinstatement of Traube–Hering waves produced a significantly greater increase in perfusion pressure in SH rats (P< 0.05). Differences in respiratory–sympathetic coupling in the SH rat were not secondary to changes in central or peripheral chemoreflex sensitivity, nor were they related to altered arterial baroreflex function. We have shown that increased SNA is already present in SH rats in early postnatal life as revealed by augmented respiratory modulation of SNA. This is reflected in an increased magnitude of Traube–Hering waves resulting in elevated perfusion pressure in the SH rat. We suggest that the amplified respiratory‐related bursts of SNA seen in the neonate and juvenile SH rat may be causal in the development of their hypertension.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.165902

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 211

Metadata

Authors
Simms, A. E., Paton, J. F. R., Pickering, A. E., & Allen, A. M.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-01-30
Volume
587
Issue
3
Pages
597-610
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2142940235
Cited by
211
References
4
FWCI
5.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.