Cited by 28Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchIon channel regulation and functionAmino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism

A functional coupling between extrasynaptic NMDA receptors and A‐type K+ channels under astrocyte control regulates hypothalamic neurosecretory neuronal activity

Open access
Naskar, Krishna, Stern, Javier E.·2014·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

Key points: In hypothalamic magnocellular neurosecretory cells, activation of glutamate NMDA receptors leads to inhibition of the transient voltage‐gated A‐type K+ current (IA), in a Ca 2+‐ and protein kinase C‐dependent manner. The negative NMDAR–IA functional coupling involves activation of extrasynaptic (e)NMDARs. The eNMDAR–IA coupling is engaged by endogenous extracellular glutamate, whose levels are controlled by astrocyte glutamate GLT1 transporters. The eNMDAR–IA coupling is enhanced during dehydration, a condition in which astrocyte GLT1 efficiency is blunted. The eNMDAR–IA coupling results in increased neuronal excitability and firing activity in magnocellular neurosecretory neurons. Taken together these studies support the concept that the eNMDAR–IA coupling is a powerful mechanism by which glutamate increases magnocellular neurosecretory excitability and firing activity. Neuronal activity is controlled by a fine‐tuned balance between intrinsic properties and extrinsic synaptic inputs. Moreover, neighbouring astrocytes are now recognized to influence a wide spectrum of neuronal functions. Yet, how these three key factors act in concert to modulate and fine‐tune neuronal output is not well understood. Here, we show that in rat hypothalamic magnocellular neurosecretory cells (MNCs), glutamate NMDA receptors (NMDARs) are negatively coupled to the transient, voltage‐gated A‐type K+ current (IA). We found that activation of NMDARs by extracellular glutamate levels influenced by astrocyte glutamate transporters resulted in a significant inhibition of IA. The NMDAR–IA functional coupling resulted from activation of extrasynaptic NMDARs, was calcium‐ and protein kinase C‐dependent, and involved enhanced steady‐state, voltage‐dependent inactivation of IA. The NMDAR–IA coupling diminished the latency to the first evoked spike in response to membrane depolarization and increased the total number of evoked action potentials, thus strengthening the neuronal input/output function. Finally, we found a blunted NMDA‐mediated inhibition of IA in dehydrated rats. Together, our findings support a novel signalling mechanism that involves a functional coupling between extrasynaptic NMDARs and A‐type K+ channels, which is influenced by local astrocytes. We show this signalling complex to play an important role in modulating hypothalamic neuronal excitability, which may contribute to adaptive responses during a sustained osmotic challenge such as dehydration.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.2014.270793

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Naskar, K., & Stern, J. E.
Affiliations
Augusta University (US)
Corresponding author
Stern, Javier E.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-06-04
Volume
592
Issue
13
Pages
2813-2827
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W1578846620
Cited by
28
References
48
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NIH HL112225)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism
Keywords
extrasynaptic NMDA receptors, A-type potassium channels, GLT-1, neuronal excitability, dehydration, protein kinase C, calcium signaling, glutamate signalling, astrocyte-neuron interaction, action potential firing rate
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Astrocytes, Calcium, Hypothalamus, Male, Neurons, Neurosecretory Systems, Osmotic Pressure, Protein Kinase C, Reaction Time, Synapses, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Rats, Wistar, Glutamic Acid, Potassium Channels, Voltage-Gated, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review