The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Reality of MALL: Still on the Fringes
Abstract
Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (MALL) has existed now for nearly two decades with its application to foreign language instruction chronicled in some 340 implementation studies. For several years already, proponents have claimed that MALL is commonplace in foreign language instruction. In reality, with few exceptions, published studies of MALL implementations have not progressed much beyond pilot testing, i.e., design proposals, proof of concepts, limited experiments, class trials. Above all, what is most striking about published MALL implementation studies is the virtual lack of follow-up reports of curricular integration. In order to put MALL applications into perspective, this paper is organized into three sections. The first gives an overview of published MALL implementation studies, the second provides a comparative analysis of MALL applications, and the last addresses the issue of MALL curricular integration. On the basis of this review, the paper concludes that MALL remains marginal in terms of the number of students and courses involved, the duration of implementations, the language skills targeted, the kinds of learning activities undertaken and the methodological approach used. Nonetheless, it also maintains that the necessary technological base and pedagogical expertise are in place to bring MALL in from the fringes to the core of foreign language teaching.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mobile collaborative language learning: State of the art
Kukulska‐Hulme, A., & Viberg, O. (2018) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12580 · Cited by 382
Twenty years of MALL project implementation: A meta-analysis of learning outcomes
Burston, J. (2015) · ReCALL · doi:10.1017/s0958344014000159 · Cited by 379
Self-citationMobile-assisted language learning: A Duolingo case study
Loewen, S., Crowther, D., Isbell, D. R., Kim, K. M., Maloney, J., Miller, Z. F., & Rawal, H. (2019) · ReCALL · doi:10.1017/s0958344019000065 · Cited by 368
Research trends in mobile assisted language learning from 2000 to 2012
Duman, G., Orhon, G., & Gedik, N. (2015) · ReCALL · doi:10.1017/s0958344014000287 · Cited by 270
The effects of using mobile devices on language learning: a meta-analysis
Chen, Z., Chen, W., Jia, J., & An, H. (2020) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-020-09801-5 · Cited by 143
Metadata
- Authors
- Burston, J.
- Venue
- CALICO Journal
- Published
- 2014-01-31
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 103-125
- ISSN
- 0742-7778 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2068700735
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 59.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Reality of MALL: Still on the Fringes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.11139/cj.31.1.103-125
- The paper
- Burston, J. (2014). The Reality of MALL: Still on the Fringes. CALICO Journal. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.31.1.103-125
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.