Measurement of the Direct-Current (Faradic) Resistance of the Electrode-Electrolyte Interface for Commonly Used Electrode Materials
Abstract
The direct-current (Faradic) resistance is important because it is the highest impedance that an electrode-electrolyte interface can attain. In this study, the Faradic resistance (Rf) of identical pairs of 0.5 cm2 electrodes of bare and chlorided silver, tin and chlorided tin, nickel-silver, copper, and carbon was measured in contact with 0.9% saline at room temperature. It was found that for positive and negative current flow, the data fit the expression Rf=Rf0 e(-alpha i) (with a high coefficient of determination), where Rf0 is the zero-current Faradic resistance and alpha is a constant that describes the manner in which Rf decreases with increasing current (i). It was found that chlorided silver exhibited the lowest Rf0; removing the chloride deposit increased Rf0 by more than sixfold. Likewise, chloriding tin reduced Rf0 by a factor of about 2. Electrolytically cleaning an electrode reduced Rf0. The highest value for Rf0 was for carbon. This paper concludes with a summary of the data for Rf0 scaled to 1 cm2 electrode area for the electrode materials measured in the present study and data from the published literature.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Good candidates for ohmic electrode-tissue contacts are gold, platinum, platinum-iridium, tungsten, and tantalum.
“Good candidates for ohmic electrode-tissue contacts are gold, platinum (Pt), platinum-iridium, tungsten, and tantalum”
From A critical review of interfaces with the peripheral nervous system for the control of neuroprostheses and hybrid bionic systems (2005) · cites this paper as Geddes and Roeder, 2001
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Navarro, X., Krueger, T. B., Lago, N., Micera, S., Stieglitz, T., & Dario, P. (2005) · Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System · doi:10.1111/j.1085-9489.2005.10303.x · Cited by 845 · see citing works
Criteria for the Selection of Materials for Implanted Electrodes
Geddes, L. A., & Roeder, R. (2003) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1114/1.1581292 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Geddes, L. A., & Roeder, R.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Venue
- Annals of Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 2001-02
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 181-186
- ISSN
- 0090-6964 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1977781268
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Electrochemistry › Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
- Keywords
- Faradaic resistance, electrode-electrolyte interface, electrode impedance, saline, copper electrode, carbon electrodes, electrolytic cleaning, current-dependent resistance, electrode materials
- MeSH terms
- Biomedical Engineering, Carbon, Copper, Electrodes, Electrolytes, Nickel, Silver, Tin, Electric Impedance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review