Air-Side Heat Transfer and Friction Correlations for Flat-Tube Louver-Fin Heat Exchangers
Abstract
The objective of this study is to develop an accurate, reliable, and updated predictive model for the air-side performance of flat-tube louver-fin heat exchangers. Using the most comprehensive experimental database to date—consisting of 1030 heat-transfer and 1270 pressure-drop measurements, from nine independent laboratories for 126 sample heat exchangers—j- and f-factor correlations are developed to predict the air-side performance of heat exchangers. The database is analyzed, the form of the curve fits is explored, and the predictive performance of the correlations is evaluated. The j- and f-factor correlations predict the experimental data with rms errors of 11.5% and 16.1%, respectively. Multiple regressions for a locally linearized data model were used to estimate the confidence intervals and covariances of the regression constants. A comparison to prior correlations shows the proposed correlations to provide more accurate predictions and to span a much broader parameter space than prior work. Practical utility in design and optimization, and unavoidable limitations in developing such correlations are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The generalized correlations [41, 58, 59, 62] show an excellent agreement with the experimental values reported by Kays and London for the '1/4(b)-11.1' core.
“Practically, these correlations show an excellent agreement with those reported by Kays and London [40], as shown in Figure 6.”
From Compact and microchannel heat exchangers: A comprehensive review of air-side friction factor and heat transfer correlations (2018) · cites this paper as [41]
Park and Jacobi tried to generalize j and f correlations for all the louver-fin types by considering most of the previous experimental data of 126 cores.
“In addition, Park and Jacobi [41] tried to generalize j and f correlations for all the louver-fin types by considering most of the previous experimental data of 126 cores.”
From Compact and microchannel heat exchangers: A comprehensive review of air-side friction factor and heat transfer correlations (2018) · cites this paper as [41]
Park and Jacobi used 126 different geometries to develop f- and j-factor correlations for louvered fin heat exchangers.
“Park and Jacobi [41] used 126 different geometries to develop f -and j -factor correlations for louvered fin heat exchangers”
From Compact and microchannel heat exchangers: A comprehensive review of air-side friction factor and heat transfer correlations (2018) · cites this paper as [41]
Park and Jacobi gathered the experimental data from previous works in addition to their new heat exchanger cores.
“They gathered the experimental data from previous works [3, 48, 53, 54, 58, 59, 61, 62, 68, 69] in addition to their new heat exchanger cores.”
From Compact and microchannel heat exchangers: A comprehensive review of air-side friction factor and heat transfer correlations (2018) · cites this paper as [41]
Figure 5 shows that the correlation error differences among studies (Park and Jacobi, Chang and Wang, Chang et al., and Kim and Bullard) were not significant except the errors associated with f-factor introduced by Kim and Bullard.
“However, Figure 5 shows that the correlation error differences among studies (Park and Jacobi [41], Chang and Wang [59], Chang et al. [58], and Kim and Bullard [61]) were not significant except the errors associated with f -factor introduced by Kim and Bullard [61].”
From Compact and microchannel heat exchangers: A comprehensive review of air-side friction factor and heat transfer correlations (2018) · cites this paper as [41]
Park and Jacobi conducted a wider range of geometries (126 cores) to obtain f- and j-factor correlations.
“Wider range of geometries (126 cores) to obtain f - and j -factor correlations were conducted by Park and Jacobi [41].”
From Compact and microchannel heat exchangers: A comprehensive review of air-side friction factor and heat transfer correlations (2018) · cites this paper as [41]
The j- and f-factor correlations [41] are in good agreement with the experimental data (Figure 6).
“In good agreement with the experimental data, refer to Figure 6.”
From Compact and microchannel heat exchangers: A comprehensive review of air-side friction factor and heat transfer correlations (2018) · cites this paper as [41]
Some researchers introduced generalized correlations such as those obtained by [41, 58, 59, 62] for representing all types of louver-fin arrangements.
“Some researchers introduced generalized correlations such as those obtained by [41, 58, 59, 62] for representing all types of louver-fin arrangements.”
From Compact and microchannel heat exchangers: A comprehensive review of air-side friction factor and heat transfer correlations (2018) · cites this paper as [41]
Some researchers included more than 50 different geometries in pursuit of introducing accurate correlations, e.g. 126 louver-fin geometries by Park and Jacobi [41], 55 offset strip-fin geometries by Yang and Li [89], and 74 fin-and-tube geometries by Wang et al. [103].
“Furthermore, some researchers included more than 50 different geometries in pursuit of introducing accurate correlations (e.g. 126 louver-fin geometries by Park and Jacobi [41], 55 offset strip-fin geometries by Yang and Li [89], and 74 of fin-and-tube geometries by Wang et al. [103]).”
From Compact and microchannel heat exchangers: A comprehensive review of air-side friction factor and heat transfer correlations (2018) · cites this paper as [41]
Cites
Air-side thermal hydraulic performance of multi-louvered fin aluminum heat exchangers
Kim, M.-H., & Bullard, C. W. (2002) · International Journal of Refrigeration · doi:10.1016/s0140-7007(01)00025-1 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics of flat tube and louvered plate fin surfaces
Achaichia, A., & Cowell, T. A. (1988) · Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science · doi:10.1016/0894-1777(88)90032-5 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Qasem, N. A. A., & Zubair, S. M. (2018) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2018.06.104 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Ayad, F., Benelmir, R., & Idris, M. (2021) · Applied Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.116218 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Xiong, T., Liu, G., Gao, Q., Yan, G., & Yu, J. (2023) · Journal of Building Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105654 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Park, Y.-G., & Jacobi, A. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- ORCID
- Jacobi, Anthony M.
- Venue
- Journal of Heat Transfer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-12-11
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0022-1481 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-8943
- OpenAlex
- W1972644876
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 9.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ASME Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer Mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Boiling Studies
- Keywords
- air-side heat transfer, pressure drop, predictive correlations, multiple linear regression, confidence intervals, finned tube heat exchanger
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review