Cited by 14Design Education and PracticeInnovative Human-Technology InteractionCreativity in Education and Neuroscience

Mitigating Design Fixation: A Visualization Tool for Enhancing Situation Awareness

Hwang, Dongwook, Choi, Byunghyun, Bae, Soonho, Park, Woojin·2021·Journal of Mechanical Design

Abstract

External stimuli can stimulate a designer's creativity and improve the outcome of design ideation for product/service concept generation. A psychological phenomenon that may occur during such utilization of external stimuli is design fixation, which is widely believed to adversely affect the ideation outcome. One of the difficulties in preventing or alleviating design fixation is that the designer may not easily detect or predict its occurrence during the mentally demanding task of ideation. In an effort to address the problem of design fixation, the current study develops a situation awareness (SA) support system, which helps the novice designer perceive and predict the occurrences of design fixation. The situation awareness support system (SASS) is empirically evaluated in its utility in mitigating design fixation. The study result shows that the situation awareness support system can help the novice designer to mitigate design fixation, while not influencing significant impact on the ideation performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1115/1.4048814

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When SA stages are disrupted, people tend to fixate and explore less effectively; conversely, scaffolding the cycle from perception through comprehension to projection can broaden search and improve outcomes.

    “Prior research shows that when these stages are disrupted, people tend to fi xate and explore less effectively; conversely, scaffolding the cycle from perception through comprehension to projection can broaden search and improve outcomes [43, 46, 76].”
  • Prior work has extensively documented what usability issues experts identify, but far less is known about how experts reason through these issues across stages of perception, interpretation, and projection.

    “While prior work has extensively documented what usability issues experts identify [35, 52], far less is known about how experts reason through these issues across stages of perception, interpretation, and projection [43, 76].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hwang, D., Choi, B., Bae, S., & Park, W.
Affiliations
  • Singapore University of Technology and Design (SG)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • SISNETinfo Co., Ltd., 128, Gasan digital 1-ro, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul 08507, South Korea
Venue
Journal of Mechanical Design
Published
2020-11-20
Volume
143
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 0161-8458 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-0472
  • 1528-9001
OpenAlex
W3093557993
Cited by
14
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Mechanical Design (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Keywords
design fixation, situational awareness, design ideation, external stimuli, creativity, novice designers, visualization tools

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review