Cited by 79Design Education and PracticeCreativity in Education and NeuroscienceExtenics and Innovation Methods

Overcoming design fixation: Design by analogy studies and nonintuitive findings

Moreno, Diana P., Blessing, Luciënne T., Yang, Maria C., Hernández, Alberto A., Wood, Kristin L.·2016·Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing

Abstract

Design fixation is a phenomenon with important significance to many fields of design due to the potential negative impacts it may have in design outcomes, especially during the ideation stage of the design process. The present study aims to provide a framework for understanding, or at least probing, design fixation by presenting a review of existing defixation approaches, as well as metrics that have been employed to understand and account for design fixation. This study also describes the results of two design by analogy (DbA) methods, WordTree and SCAMPER, to overcome design fixation in an experiment that involved 97 knowledge-domain experts. The study outcomes are at least twofold: a common framework of metrics and approaches to overcome design fixation in a wide range of design problems and nonintuitive results for DbA approaches in design fixation and other related creativity metrics. The application of WordTree and SCAMPER shows that both methods yield increased novelty compared to a control, where the SCAMPER results are significantly higher than WordTree. It is also found that WordTree mitigates design fixation whereas SCAMPER appears to be ineffective for this purpose but effective to generate an increased quantity of novel ideas. These results demonstrate that both DbA methods provide de-fixation capabilities and enhance designers’ creativity during idea generation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0890060416000068

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two raters blind to the experiment's aims counted the presence of features from the example avatar in participants' sketches.

    “Following the approach used in design fixation literature [45], two raters blind to the experiment's aims counted the presence of features from the example avatar in the sketches created by the participants.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 95 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moreno, D. P., Blessing, L. T., Yang, M. C., Hernández, A. A., & Wood, K. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Luxembourg (LU)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Tecnológico de Monterrey (MX)
  • Singapore University of Technology and Design (SG)
Corresponding author
Moreno, Diana P.
Venue
Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing
Published
2016-04-18
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
185-199
ISSN
  • 0890-0604 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1760
OpenAlex
W2339716039
Cited by
79
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 1
FWCI
6.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Artificial intelligence for engineering design analysis and manufacturing (publishedVersion)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • University of Texas at Austin
  • Université du Luxembourg
  • Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey
  • Singapore University of Technology and Design
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Extenics and Innovation Methods
Keywords
design fixation, design by analogy, SCAMPER, idea generation, creativity metrics, novelty, design process

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review