A Zero Trust Hybrid Security and Safety Risk Analysis Method
Abstract
Designing complex, socio-technical, cyber-physical systems has become increasingly challenging in recent years. Interdependencies between engineering domains can lead to emergent behavior that is difficult to predict and manage. The recent shift toward model-based design has demonstrated significant advantages for minimizing these challenges (McDermott et al. 2020. Benchmarking the benefits and current maturity of model-based systems engineering across the enterprise. results of the model-based systems engineering (MBSE) maturity survey, part 1: Executive summary. Technical Report SERC-2020-SR-001, Systems Engineering Research Center.). Further, the early identification of safety and security design weaknesses in safety-critical systems leads to reduced redesign costs in later design phases (Yang and EI-Haik, 2003. Design for Six Sigma. McGraw-Hill, New York City; Clausing and Frey, 2005. Improving system reliability by failure-mode avoidance including four concept design strategies. Systems Engineering, 8(3), pp. 245–261.). As a result, this article contributes the Multidisciplinary Early Design Risk Assessment Framework (MEDRAF) methodology for early combined safety and security assessment based on interdisciplinary dependency models of a system. The focus is on factors contributing to the estimation of the probabilities of successful attacks on system components. The Zero Trust paradigm is applied in which all humans, hardware, and processes interacting with the system are considered to pose a security risk. A calculation of security-related probability estimates is presented which is dependent on the current global security environment. Subsequently, security and safety probability estimates are combined to present an overall safety-security risk calculation using hybrid safety-security trees. The risk values help designers assess the loss of specific key components and safety functions. The methodology is demonstrated with a case study of a spent fuel pool cooling system in a nuclear reactor. The results of the case study show that the risk of losing one key system component doubles when combining security and safety compared to only assessing safety events. This paper is based on a paper presented at the CIE 2020 conference (Papakonstantinou et al., 2020. Towards a zero trust hybrid security and safety risk analysis method. In International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers.).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In [19], the authors investigate multidisciplinary early design risk assessment, considering joint safety and security based on a common model, which supports accurate estimation of the probability of successful attacks on system components.
“In [19], the authors investigate the field of multidisciplinary early design risk assessment, considering joint safety and security considerations based on a common model, which supports the accurate estimation of the probability of successful attacks on system components.”
From A Zero-Trust Architecture for Remote Access in Industrial IoT Infrastructures (2023) · cites this paper as [19]
Cites
Rose, S., Borchert, O., Mitchell, S., & Connelly, S. (2020) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-207 · Cited by 1,174 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey on Zero Trust Architecture: Challenges and Future Trends
He, Y., Huang, D., Chen, L., Ni, Y., & Ma, X. (2022) · Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing · doi:10.1155/2022/6476274 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
A Zero-Trust Architecture for Remote Access in Industrial IoT Infrastructures
Federici, F., Martintoni, D., & Senni, V. (2023) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics12030566 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
- Authors
- Papakonstantinou, N., Van Bossuyt, D. L., Linnosmaa, J., Hale, B., & O’Halloran, B.
- Affiliations
- VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (FI)
- Department of Systems Engineering, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA 93943
- Naval Postgraduate School (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering
- Publisher
- ASME International
- Published
- 2021-05-13
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 1530-9827 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7078
- OpenAlex
- W3143116640
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 4.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering (publishedVersion)
- Calhoun: The Naval Postgraduate School Institutional Archive (Naval Postgraduate School) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Naval Postgraduate School
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Risk and Safety Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Keywords
- zero-trust architecture, safety-critical systems, cyber-physical systems, model-based systems engineering, attack probability estimation, nuclear reactor safety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review