Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 441

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biaxial Mechanical Properties of the Natural and Glutaraldehyde Treated Aortic Valve Cusp—Part I: Experimental Results

Billiar, K. L., Sacks, M. S.·2000·Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

Abstract

To date, there are no constitutive models for either the natural or bioprosthetic aortic valve (AV), in part due to experimental complications related to the AV’s small size and heterogeneous fibrous structure. In this study, we developed specialized biaxial testing techniques for the AV cusp, including a method to determine the local structure–strain relationship to assess the effects of boundary tethering forces. Natural and glutaraldehyde (GL) treated cusps were subjected to an extensive biaxial testing protocol in which the ratios of the axial tensions were held at constant values. Results indicated that the local fiber architecture clearly dominated cuspal deformation, and that the tethering effects at the specimen boundaries were negligible. Due to unique aspects of cuspal fiber architecture, the most uniform region of deformation was found at the lower portion as opposed to the center of the cuspal specimen. In general, the circumferential strains were much smaller than the radial strains, indicating a profound degree of mechanical anisotropy, and that natural cusps were significantly more extensible than the GL treated cusps. Strong mechanical coupling between biaxial stretch axes produced negative circumferential strains under equibiaxial tension. Further, the large radial strains observed could not be explained by uncrimping of the collagen fibers, but may be due to large rotations of the highly aligned, circumferential-oriented collagen fibers in the fibrosa. In conclusion, this study provides new insights into the AV cusp’s structure–function relationship in addition to requisite data for constitutive modeling. [S0148-0731(00)00901-8]

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1115/1.429624

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 441

Metadata

Authors
Billiar, K. L., & Sacks, M. S.
Venue
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
Published
1999-07-28
Volume
122
Issue
1
Pages
23-30
ISSN
  • 0148-0731 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-8951
OpenAlex
W1963483392
Cited by
441
References
17
FWCI
4.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biaxial Mechanical Properties of the Natural and Glutaraldehyde Treated Aortic Valve Cusp—Part I: Experimental Results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1115/1.429624
The paper
Billiar, K. L., & Sacks, M. S. (2000). Biaxial Mechanical Properties of the Natural and Glutaraldehyde Treated Aortic Valve Cusp—Part I: Experimental Results. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.429624

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.